The U.S. does not have a "no confidence" vote procedure

"Willful negligence" can be considered in the course of a criminal proceeding.

I am on the record as saying that Texas (as well as other states) could have called a Constitutional convention in order to engage the process of secession. If need be, we could have seceded and then either engaged in another compact or provide a timeline for addressing crime on the federal level and then engage in a process of reconstitution based on a federal system.

That did not happen until now.

I also contacted every Attorney General I had available contact information for (at least 40) at the end of 2018. I had in February of 2018 began a process of creating a legal strategy for state-based CRIMINAL proceedings in connection with allegations regarding the "opioid epidemic" that could have specifically illustrated efforts to defraud their state marketplaces in connection with other crimes associated with the Affordable Care Act rollout and its state mandates. This could have provided a form of state-based security to any efforts at moving forward on their local medical insurance needs as well as crack down on illicit distribution efforts that implicated other economic and perhaps administrative sectors. I contacted them about a Constitutional violation involving the State of Texas; this could have been a more productive relationship had it been heeded at the time.

I now contend that the manners in which the opioid epidemic allegations were addressed constituted complicity with the ongoing criminal conspiracy and is being meted out now under the auspices of the COVID-19 "pandemic response." Earlier cases regarding the Oxycontin problem prior to the cases engaged in connection with what was alleged to occur in what they call "Appalachia" show that there was on some level an intent to create a distribution system and disabuse the judicial process, including in permitting for the "confidentializing" of information that would be needed as evidence in later CRIMINAL investigations, using tactics that had been used in other areas over the last 30 years. Not only that, but I contend there was an intent to engage in strategic efforts aimed at leveraging the risk of losing civil cases on the potential gain of market share in the role out of alleged "telemedication regimes" and that certain benchmarks provided a form of outlay with an understanding that the "penalties" could be recapitulated at a later time and allowed to be refactored in later efforts to "insure" activities by those who were the "intellectual authors" of the crimes committed in the course of this criminal conspiracy.

I see these "vaccines" for COVID-19 in lieu of any responsible action engaged on curtailing the harms proliferated by the continued roll out of 5G to be a form of chemical weaponry. I will be viewing EVERYTHING that occurs in connection with the distribution and dissemination of these "vaccines" akin to chemical weapons distribution, including in consideration of who gets it, who distributes it, who is compelled or agrees to administer it or receive it, and how it ends up effecting people later on. I already know it can be inventoried and insofar as nanotechnology has been included in the development of the vaccine, it can potentially be effected by radiofrequency manipulation. I have experienced this myself for a considerable amount of time, specifically after being kidnapped for 10 days in March of 2017 and then directly after I requested information in February of 2018 on the batch number as well as technical specifications on any nanotechnology used in the administration of a immunization booster shot I received as part of my job requirement for the San Francisco Department of Public Health in August of 2013. I believe I have neutralized the capacity for that nanotechnology to effect me, however, I also understand that someone else monitored what occurred to assess the viability of using similar tactics in the administration of a vaccine or immunization for later application -- I believe they intend to do that NOW with the alleged "vaccine" regarding "COVID-19."

Please recall that in July of 2019 the Russian Legislature passed a law about cell phones and electronic programs on cell phones in Russia. Public reports stated it was signed by Vladimir Putin in November to go into effect in July of 2020. That would be right before it was announced that Russia had created its first "vaccine" for "COVID-19." It is telling that Putin took the vaccine himself first, then offered it to other heads of state, and then gave it to his "daughter." What happened in the U.S. during this time frame and up until now?

This belies proof that other countries KNOW this is a biological weapon and that "chemical weapons" can be engaged to effect its effectiveness while there is electronic recourse to staving off its proliferation and/or lethality. It would have been different had this been acknowledged as a "terrorist attack" or an act of "electronic warfare using biological weapons." The "vaccine" could be seen as a self-defense mechanism and political and social organizing could be effected accordingly. That is not what they are doing. I contend that what they are doing is politically engineering us into acceding to slavery as a means by which to cover up for their intentional efforts to undermine the government and compel us to cede our personal private property rights.

Paying taxes for public goods is a duty. Paying taxes on someone else's effort to claim human beings as property is a crime.

10:50 am CST

Dec. 11, 2020

Proofread by 10:54 am CST