Isolate and Contain - 4.3.2025

Was this actually in September of 2019?

No it was not.

The title font was not my decision. WRONG.

I am certain they "prayed" a lot and used "miss[ile]s" in Sodom and Gomorrah.

The problem is that when we walked away and I looked back g-d gave me SALT I and SALT II and there was no incest later on.

Stop please. "Damn the intercessor." All you have done is wasted my time and a lot of other people's time.

No. I do not owe any "Christian" church anything and have not since the burning of the roof at the Cathedral of Notre Dame. You trying to bid a deal with the devil who has been squatting Holy Land does not change that.

That is why we made pickles.

Get that man who has already PAID for it his ranch. Stop trying to pretend it was yours -- again. I "would have been " devoted to the cause of killing French and Spanish slavers the same as any other.

Someone once discussed with me among us the difference between "Thou shalt not kill" and "Thou shalt not murder."

Perhaps you should not have materially altered the stock base on that background check before you tried to say it was yours.

11:44 am CST

April 3, 2025

President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse

_______________________________________

Early in the year I composed a recommendation for a school security system. I posted a short description of it on my blog. But then with events that were unfolding at the time I was concerned that someone was going to use that specific post along with other aspects of information I had compiled to actually activate a school shooting. I had followed a series of Treasury issues and other large-scale financial deals that fit a pattern, and when I found in a Wall Street Journal specific metrics coded to reissues for certain dates I was concerned that my posting of that information about my school security system was specifically being coded for “pinging” for what I was concerned would amount to a school shooting.

That school shooting did not happen at that time. Instead, there was what I understood to be a terrorist event in Paris that was a “reissue” on a terrorist attack that was previously supposed to occur in Paris but due to mitigating factors of which I was not aware of at the time but of which I became aware later it actually occurred in London. With the sequence unfolding at that time, I knew there was going to be a terrorist attack in Paris. I was not expecting that attack to be a fire at the cathedral of Notre Dame. Afterward, upon evaluating the evidence precipitating the event, I understood how it was that it was in fact part of the pattern. I also understood the significance and how events had been refactored to commit what I was concerned would escalate into a terrorist attack later involving a school. That materialized in Colorado.

I will not go into details about the pattern or the sequence. I will say that when the terrorist attack at the Cathedral of Notre Dame occurred it was different from previous experiences I had that involved terrorist attacks on Holy Sires. Often times there is a huge “transaction” that occurs when a Holy Site is attacked, especially if people are injured or killed. Something different happened with Notre Dame. I completely evaluated it from a perspective of understanding it in a sequence of planned events that had specific intended material outcomes. But a week later, something else happened.

And it was very spiritual. I will put it very simply: My bonds with the Catholic Church were permanently severed. I still see the attack on the Cathedral of Notre Dame as a terrorist attack and evaluate it as such. But I also understand that this site included “bondings” to the Catholic Church that were meant to last beyond the lifetime of the individual who was bound. I understood that at some point in my past, I was ACTUALLY Jewish and very devout. I was a woman, and I was confronted with a situation wherein if I did not agree to be baptized and to baptize my children, we would be put to death. So I was baptized. In a river. I do not know where or exactly when. But I know that I experienced that “baptism” as a form of soul death. It was as if the act of accepting what I understood to be a false G-d, and binding my children to that false G-d, was a grave sin. I understand that a lot of my karma in this life with the Catholic Church came from this binding in my past.

It was nine days after the church burned that I had this revelation. For the record, I absolutely believe that ALL Holy Sites should be protected and when anyone takes it upon themselves to destroy or defile a Holy Site then they have called in a higher form of judgment. I personally would never support the intentional destruction of anyone’s Holy Site. If a group is running a racket out of their “church” then I would support arresting the leadership and shutting down the operation. But to use a Holy Site as a military target is unacceptable to me. I make no pretenses about what is possible through the engagement of ritual practice in a sanctified site. But that is another realm.

I understand that insofar as MY bonds with the Catholic Church and Christendom in general have been severed then so to have the bonds that my family has in connection with me to the Church. It is what it is. I AM in a sort of limbo that my mother feared immediately after I was born that compelled her to have me baptized the day I was born. I am NOT actually a member of any spiritual or faith practice or community, though on a higher level I wish to be. But that baptism and no other baptism binds me or my relations. That is one of the consequences of the burning of the Cathedral of Notre Dame, at least for me and my soul.

Now, however, I still repudiate the attempt of anyone to “bond” their children to me. When I developed that security system it was the first precondition that had to be implemented in order for me to agree to participate in a society that expected me personally to be involved with child rearing. I have been a teacher and I have been involved in children’s lives in the past and that has provided me with the sorts of information I have on possible harms that can affect children. But I do NOT have any children.

I will say bluntly that a great affliction for my soul for many years is that when I was 19-years-old I had an abortion. I believed AT THE TIME that I was killing my unborn child. I spent nearly a month in massive depression over it before I did it. I had absolutely no one in my life at the time who saw an abortion as a form of “murder” of a child. I was repeatedly told that it was “my choice” but how can one choose to kill their unborn child? The father, however, did not want the child to be born and came from a family and environment wherein an “abortion” was considered a right. And I told myself that if these were the sorts of people that I was going to have to make my way in the world with, how could I raise a child in this world? To have that child at that time in my eyes was the subject that child to an immoral environment wherein I would be compelled to expose that child to situations that I judged would be crueler for the child that to bear the sin of killing the child before it was born.

It was that brutal and that honest.

A few years ago, after I stopped taking the drugs that I was told I needed to “stabilize” me in my “mental illness,” I had a ritual on my own to ask that soul of my never-born child to forgive me and what I would need to do to atone for what I did to him. It was a private ritual. My son is somewhere in a world that values him. And it is not with me. And that is the way it is.

I read some time ago a book about Jewish women in the times of the Byzantine that threw their babies down into wells to drown them rather than force them to convert to Christianity. This was a while ago I read this, but after the ritual. I am not emotional now about the fact that I wept at the time profusely. A part of me actually felt without knowing why that they did something that I had not done, insofar as they would rather kill their own children than permit them to be raised as slaves to a false G-d. No one ever talks about these worlds. But they exist.

Or existed, as in the past.

I said “no” to having children bound to me. But yesterday I understood that there is an ongoing series of events involving what I understand to be parents and others who are binding the futures of children to long-term promises that the parents can or will not pay. That is why I say “no.” These things can last beyond this life. But perhaps much like the burning of the Cathedral of Notre Dame, which is a crime, this binding to or through me now has the consequence of assuring that no child that has thusfar been bound to or through me will be bound to the decisions of their parents when it comes to matters of the spiritual world. Those children will have to make their own conscious choices about their spiritual relationships with G-d and each other when the time is right. No parent gets to claim an inheritance to or through their child and no parent gets to wave off of work through their own sin or obligation using their child. Not in the realm of the Holy. What is for Earth shall be given to Earth but give unto G-d what is His. Your children’s relationship with G-d is theirs to decide.

And so is their relationship to the military, at least so far as I was used to provide access to or for other people’s children. On the day that 16 members of the military were killed in Mississippi, there was a public announcement on the same feed that provided the electronic transaction that financed that event that announced the swearing in of new child and youth citizens aboard a military maritime vessel in California. No one gets to flip 16 dead American citizens of age and formally and consensually enlisted in the U.S. military for child soldiers whose confirmation into the United States is predicated on their “binding” to a Navy fixed asset. There are actually U.S. military veterans that were born in other countries. But this is a separate matter. Were there to have been a trial to expose the nexus of this systemetology, then there might have been other manners in which new citizens, including new youth and child citizens, could have been associated with matters of National Defense involving me. But the process addressed above is no longer an option.

I said that I wanted to receive a percentage of the bond recovery that I was entitled to as someone who “blew the whistle” on a pattern of racketeering involving municipal financing instruments that engaged in acts of human trafficking to launder money form crimes including and up to acts of terrorism. But, when children are bound on to me as some sort of package without their being a formal legal recognition of these sorts of schemes and a verifiable third dimensional means by which tot explicate the potential connections and assure that they are effectively protected against any sort of long-term consequences, then to me it is as if someone is trying to use their children as leverage in negotiating a payout on acts of exploitation. Is it a “damage?” I cannot put a price on a child, much less demand triple.

I withdraw my mandate for a payout on the Dallas-Fort Worth Municipal bond. What I DO want is assistance with obtaining whatever the recovery amount was in connection with my March of 2016 reports to HUD and HHS concerning events in Chicago. And I want assistance in shutting down the Bridge Over Troubled Waters in Pasadena, TX. And I want prosecution of the police officers in Houston, TX that aided and abetted my trafficking in connection with what I understand to be acts of fraud in connection with their and other pension funds.

I will not go to a shelter. I will not accept forged documents. I am not provide any unofficial federal budget servicing. And until such time as the aforementioned are reconciled in one manner or another then I refuse to have any financial or other connection to programs involving children, including programs to finance ISDs or teacher salaries.

My religious preference is a private affair. There should be adherence to the US and State of Texas Constitutions involving the role of the church and the state. I shall not accept any form of requiring to privilege one sect above another or to engage in acts that violate my conscience in order to receive what I should be able to provide for myself if I was not being intentionally disposed of my private property in order to be put to public use for which I have not been compensated and have not provided consent. Via case law that I have already sited the burden of proof that I am not qualified to contract for myself in terms of acquisition of or use of my personal private property is on the State of Texas; in over two years they have refused to provide this documentation. I believe that means the deadline has passed to prove that their original allegations are legitimate and hence any claims made in association with it are null and void, to say the least.

This will be my last blog post until such time as I am not compelled to use computers at a public library or a Texas Workforce Solutions. If you are interested in contacting me, know that until further notice I am using public resources like the library. I do have another email account that is not gmail. I understand it is supposed to provide encryption possibilities and is based out of Germany. You may choose which one you wish to contact me at if you wish to do so.

charity.colleen.crouse@gmail.com

SpaceHawk@tutanota.com

May 18, 2019

10:47 am CST

"Blackening of the name" is the legal definition of "libel" insofar as the Texas Bill of Rights is concerned.

I did not do this to you or yours.

I repudiated your tyranny and your heresy.

3 minutes on April 3, 2025.

President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse

Don't try to put this on Claudia. You do not know who you are dealing over...