Dear Secretary Wong:

 

Please consider the following via “Dr. Sam Mitrani - 12.126.2023”:

 

• "They were created to protect the new form of wage-labor capitalism that emerged in the mid- to late-19th century from the threat posed by that system’s offspring, the working class.”

 

Does this likewise include the “sex trade” as “wage-labor?” Does this include the “police” as “wage-labor?”

 

As was first discussed in early December of 2022 and developed throughout the winter and early Spring of 2023, the Administration priorities had identified the role of Labor and Energy in connection with national priorities. The concurrence of factors regarding the role of Defense was also of paramount importance, including insofar as Energy and Defense in the United States correlate in very important and strategic manners, including domestically but not exclusive to “domestic” per the consideration of the priorities attendant with the reconsideration of the roles of State and Interior relative to treaty obligations with “Indian tribes.”

 

Specific is the implementation of policy aims positing “human labor as energy” and the attendant considerations of wage labor versus ownership of means of production. This also includes factors associated with “time-labor” management and what would be considered “leisure” as well as the manners in which that which is intangible – including as property – becomes tangible and when. Thus far, as has been recurrently discussed, remanding these matters to Health and Human Services has proven insufficient and a better consideration is accorded when evaluated relative to Energy. 

 

Please also recall the first National Security briefing in April of 2023 that was followed up on later regarding “Sexually Transmitted Diseases” relative to “Sexually Transmitted Infections” and what was outrolling at the time. This includes considerations of the attempted links between “STI’s” and other forms of “infections” that would qualify under Executive Orders issued in the last two decades or more specific to the role of “infectious” or “contagious” diseases, including “air-bourne” or “respiratory infections” and National Security regarding pandemics, including up to the “triple threat” of a potential terrorist attack, natural disaster, and “infectious disease” outbreak.

 

These matters are also relevant as they pertain to cybersecurity, including in regards to how laws changed with the implementation of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (specific to changes correlating with the passage and implementation of the Affordable Care Act) and attendant updates specific to the requirements for those who administer electronic health records and the secure processes by which they are maintained. Based on our former work experience together, you and I have specific experience with these matters that qualifies us for certain expertise and is one of the reasons why I understand you to be best suited to the position of Secretary of Energy in the current Administration. Please recall the assessments and acknowledgement that I accorded to all of those who were nominated for cabinet positions, relative to how their practical life experience qualified them specifically and exceptionally for the roles to which they were nominated and how our combined expertise was to be of great advantage to the country and to our efforts with our international partners.  

 

I understand that not everyone agrees with my National Security focus regarding STD’s/STI’s and their relationship to biological weapons and the threat of biological weapons, or the manners in which I understand COVID-19 in regards to biological and chemical weapons as well as the consideration of “national countermeasures.” I am aware of both domestic U.S. laws as well as international treaties to which the United States is signatory regarding chemical weapons as well as biological weapons. I am also aware of long-standing U.S. Department of Defense concerns regarding considerations of biological weapons and “cultural property” and how this correlates with electronic warfare regimes and their intersection with information warfare strategies. This is one reason while alteration of electronic records, including and especially electronic records of official government reports and materials as required under the Electronic Records Act, is a National Security issue, and not just because of alleged “cybersecurity” issues and allegations of “foreign-origin hacking.” 

 

In this regard, the energy used to transmit electronic information, including but not exclusive to the use of the internet, is a major matter that correlates with all departments, including Health and Human Services, but not exclusive or primary to it. It is also one of the major reasons why the charges as affirmed on Dec. 9, 2023 are key to how we must move forward when evaluating how misrepresentations of electronic government records end up being permitted to be reposited as “bids” on “contracts” – including on contracts provided through the Department of Defense. I say “Department of Defense” in this context specific to the manners in which other Departments are being addressed herein.

 

As such, I contend the above stated in reference to “sex trade” needs to likewise be officially reconsidered in regards to the Administration priorities relative to “human labor as energy.” This includes understanding matters related to overt and flagrant violation of existing labor law from a National Security perspective. The matters pertaining to “privacy” and “use” of “public space,” including in regards to their intersections with electronic or other surveillance and the legal requirements with accessing or transmitting “production” that occurs in “public” or “private” spaces, are not only a matter of law, but as they say, a matter of “fact” and the matter of “fact” is also determined by our work to assure that people are apprised of their rights and the consequences for violating them. This is more than a matter for intersession via State, Commerce and Defense. It is also a major priority for Justice, Labor and Interior. 

 

I trust that you will continue to demonstrate your expertise and leadership at this time and moving forward. Let me know what you need to be supported in this regard. I am looking forward to your end of the year review on how you understand matters to have transpired thus far, including your direct and incisive critique of my performance as well as the supports that you have had and what you need, and what is your vision for the next year and the following years. 

 

In conclusion, let me acknowledge that I am apprised of an urgent matter pertaining to Labor and “private equity” and certain considerations of local jurisdiction when it comes to political determinations about compensation and authority for public workers. I am also apprised of how it may factor into negotiations for workers in the private sector. I am of the opinion personally that “organized labor” in the form that we in the United States have come to know it is in a position of contradiction based upon the distinctions between “public” and “private” sector workers when it comes to what are the “means” over which they believe themselves to be entitled to “ownership.” I will revise my own analysis based on Fourteenth, Thirteenth and Fourth Amendment considerations to account for other information and critique to which I have been apprised and provide to you my analysis and re-analysis for your critical consideration by January 5, 2023.

 

2:37 pm CST

Dec. 26, 2023

Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse

  

Proofread by 2:45 pm CST

​

[2:55 pm CST on Dec. 26, 2023].