top of page
Search

Food for Stolen Oil - 5.13.2026

  • Writer: charitycolleencrouse
    charitycolleencrouse
  • May 13
  • 7 min read


So if I try to do something with the 12-day today, then tomorrow is the second 12-day which is Day 13 for today. And we have the SAME SET UP EACH TIME: today, the “Hardie’s truck” with the “food” for the “children” at the school across the street was at the “back door” where the employee parking lot is instead of the front door and was unloading as the City of Dallas came up and “checked the water main cover.” The other water main covers (at least three) are STILL removed from the water main area since at the latest Jan. 8, 2026 – this whole time. That means THEIR “May 1” was “black market food for kids.” THAT WAS THE WHOLE SET UP with the “older women” and their “minerals” since December of 2024. How many “students” at that school would be identified on a Census form by their parents as children of “Arab-Americans?” “Arab-American” is still listed on the Census, correct? What about “Muslim?” Do they even ask? No, it is supposed to be “indigenous” for “Jim’s” – which by now are young African-American men and they are allowing BOTH the “Latino/Hispanic Non-[Mexican]” and “Latino/Hispanic- [Mexican]” to be collapsed in with the “Muslims” – by which they mean “Arab-American” and “Asian-American.” My understanding is that “South Asian/Pacific Islander” is NOT included and is…something else…and that most likely will be tomorrow, correct?


So if I go on what I did and would accredit/attribute for “performance” then today someone else gets the “credit” for the “black market activity” but I DO NOT which means that if I “leverage” today’s “good credit” for successful performance then tomorrow I will be “defaulted” for something else, that will be “trashed”/”junked” and then what happens to tomorrow? I am going to “die” overnight anyway and as it has been going ALL YEAR now it is a “double hit.” Day 14 is someone else’s “appeal period” and it all goes to them anyhow…


What about the “insurance?” These sorts of loans on a pension fund are not the same as a loan on an insurance policy. They just had for the first time I have seen the “Community Court” set up a desk (I walked out and it is gone now) and THAT IS JUST WHAT I ACCUSED THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS OF DOING IN CONNECTION WITH THE ALLEGATIONS OF WHAT HAPPENED AT SADNAYA AND THAT IS CONNECTED TO WHAT THEY ARE DOING IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WITH THE PRESBYTERIAN HEALTH SYSTEMS DOWN THE STREET. It is not only a war crime but their “[jewish sex ]healthcare exchanges” DO NOT WORK! What “insurance” claims cash out at Day 31? What about the use of these 12- and 13-day “loan” arrangements/collection arrangements? The “13-day” option occurred AFTER I FILED MY CASE AND WAS ALREADY ON THE STREET long enough to see what they did with the Municipal Investment Code changes while I was ALSO on the street. This is the fourth successive wave of “street laws” put into unconstitutional effect in Texas ALONE and they NEVER account for the jurisdiction appropriately. NEVER NOT ONCE!


Today is the Finance Committee meeting for the Northern Texas Municipal Water District. I went through that yesterday. And then this happens today? THIS IS EXACTLY WHY I SAID THE MESQUITE AND GARLAND BONDS WERE UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND EXTORTIONATE! We have seen with the EPIC fiasco (remember that Simonetti’s heisted housing plan was allowed to be “transferred[?]”/traded[?]” to an organization called “EPIC” in Austin that was supposedly helping “homeless people” – including going through the Salvation Army – to get “housing”). What happened to that? Did they do something similar with that that they are trying to do in/with Mesquite? They had JUST built a new mosque in Mesquite – including if I am correct with private monies – before the COVID and all…and now, as one could see by the documents that were stolen with the three carts, the “public notices” on the “EPIC case” correlated with what? And when?


I had said that each cart represented a different “level” at which this year’s proposed Federal Budget could be addressed relative to understandings that 1) everything I had previous to that since what would have been the July 15, 2025 deadline from last year was stolen on Sept. 18, 2025 and so it represented what I got in the meantime, including in regard to the stolen “production line” on Feb. 5, 2026; and 2) that the accounting for the “number/demographic experiences” indicated by the cart had relevance in terms of what and at what level the respective “people” could or would be concerned. This has been consistent – what happened to my request for a Plan of Discovery? – and now what I have instead is, what? A “divorcee?” A “rich immigrant?” A “widowed senior?” I am not kidding…


They usually start these things off with a “cruise” which means the first thing I have to do is “pre-pay” for another “cruise” don’t I? Get it – “cruise”/”Cruz”/”Crouse”/”crus.” What do I have as the original “arrangement?”


“72 packets Red Star yeast

All-purpose flour and other flour

Dry pasta

Gallon of Olive Oil”


Now, at the “fort” that kind of “stockpile” is relatively “rich” compared with what one can keep with them on the street while they are “mobile,” isn’t it? What would the above represent as a “derivative” for whomever was “running” women in the street using such things as their “loans?”


I “would” get “books.” Did I acquire any “books” in the meantime? Is that commensurate with – what – the “black market commerce” demand?


“The Mansion on Turtle Creek Cookbook” - 05-06-26 8:31 pm.


Excuse me?


Now, a “recipe” counts as what? A “plan?” A “strategy?” And that means what under “property law?” So if I “bid” it and YOU have the same cookbook that means one thing but if you do not…and I contend that I SHOULD BE IN MY HOME AT TURTLE CREEK where as of Feb. 12, 2026 I WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE THREE APARTMENTS (including at that time as representative of not only triple damages owed but for the three publications at which I was a journalist/managing editor/copy editor of a bilingual publication but also relative to …) and that would mean something very different in SECURING whatever the “loan” was. What are the “property values” on that when it comes to the “taxes?” I MEAN IT! This is NOT just about the “school district” but the PARENT OF THE CHILD. Instead, what, does she get me “tax relief” at a different school district rate than I would be charged in my own? Or, does she get the “risk credit” herself for taking the risk in the lower-income/lower-property value area than the one I “would be in” at the time? What “tree” am I planting in the flower pot that indicates her “success” right now?


My “options” were supposed to be:

  1. Apple

  2. Pomegranate

  3. Orange

Only one would be suitable as an “urban street planter” to fulfill the 26er indicator at this time. 


And you want to say…what about it?


Now from April 19 what was that?


THAT was supposed to be “Irving” and the “orchard in Irving” from 2023-2024.


They do not have any “pomegranate” trees…and the two “cherry tree” options are $80 each. Go figure…


This same site – I used it with regard to a Supreme Court case acknowledgement and now that email is missing…what does that do to HER later on down the road?


What about her “children?”


FUCK YOU. 


Yes you NAZIs did the same thing to Simonetti.


So I just have to “bid her out” again according to YOUR logic, right?


Or, what, I get ANOTHER TREE?


How is SHE going to be “released” from your “minerals” scheme if it is not a “fruit-bearing tree on the street?”


Did you get “nut trees” for the “boys?”



.


Yes, there was a “golden delicious apple” in cellophane as a specific “investment” as there were also two other apple varieties BEFORE they stole the production line that “made it through” the heist with me.


That “would have” included the same with the pomegranate that they did NOT get during the heist which was on the cabinet that was used as an altar with the other items on top in the parking lot. 


____________________________


Cabo Outdoor Planter


And then


9:06 am CST on May 13, 2026.


Correct?


But that would ONLY be IF she accepted the “black market rate” for the “insurance” while she was “on the street?”


Because otherwise she would be in MY apartment at “Turtle Creek” and “credited” from May of 2019.


Correct?


_____________________________


P. 184: Cinnamon Brioche French Toast (not quite the same as my “French toast recipe” – which was written down – from January of 2024 and meant to feed brunch to how many people?)

P. 178 (179): Mac and Cheese with Ham (what happened to my “mutton ham” from summer of 2023?) [The OTHER one “would be” for tomorrow – for someone else, correct?]

Then – Eucalyptus and Rosemary for the “Olive Oil.”


Now…see what did I get last night? — what “essential oils” are there in the “cleansing wipes?”


Cucumber and aloe vera.


The eucalyptus and rosemary oil was an “organic insect repellent” and the first time I made it was IN HONDURAS. I made it last October and it was STOLEN in November. 


No, that “would not” be equivalent.


And so what does THAT mean?


_____________________________


Now, see what “she” did on May 5?



Well, well, well…what was that “case” that she had?


“10:42 am CST

4.30.2026

[Signature]

For May 1, 2026”


Follow-up 5.10.2026


Did you see the prices of “diesel” in the last two days?


“Computer 23”


What “would that” match?


Exactly what I said above…



Now, is that a “XXX?” Even if you DO have to “sacrifice the first?”


What else is there TO SAY?


My goodness…there is even a three-day clearing period…


that cleared, unless, you need “jet fuel” correct?


See May 10, 2026.


1:23 pm CST

May 13, 2026

Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse


Buy the fucking tree and the planter already.



________________________________


1:38 pm CST on 5.13.2026/CCC



 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Post 202: Post Transhumaneconomics - 6.4.2026

Is something missing? ____________________________ 3 of 11 Is it going to get through? Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com> Sep 19, 2020, 8:10 PM to kevin I used to be a journalist and edi

 
 
 
Post 201: Prize Fight Winner - 6.3.2026

Re: Prize Fight - 6.3.2026 (yes…that would be like the “lobby” with the game shows for your undisclosed-at-the-time “King of Prussia” way…) Bag 1: Barton Greenville (by 5:20 pm CST on 4.27.2026) https

 
 
 
Post 200: Happy 9th Birthday! - 6.2.2026

Today is exactly nine years since what came to be identifiable as Cause No. wr-87,139-01was "born" at the Texas Supreme Court. It was ACTUALLY "born" at the Texas Supreme Court, but after June 12, 201

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page