No. 107: Strike on Federal Budget for 2026 - 3.12.2025

Good morning Americans:

Despite all else, as of yesterday before close of business, all was attended to to address matters regarding what would be necessary for a successful and Constitutional federal budget process this year to be prepared for next year. Since my formal declaration on Jan. 24, 2023 that would make this the third cycle, however, since my formal declaration of intent to run for President of the United States in 2021 it would be the fifth cycle. One may already know that the first year of a President's term is based upon the budget set by the outgoing President the previous year. One may also know that March 15 of every year is the time for the White House to confer with Executive Agencies to have prepared their department priorities in order to assure that by April 15 the White House and the President's proposed budget for the upcoming year is ready to be sent to Congress to review in time for June 15, July 15, and finally August 15.

Yesterday was four days before the March 15 deadline. That all that needed to be accomplished -- despite adversity and even acrimony -- was able to be accomplished says something about the potential if one were to "take stock" in the resolve and the faith and credit of the People with whom you would be working. We are, however, in a most difficult position. Today is also more than 60 days after a formal request for Congressional and Senate audits of various agencies and departments, as well as ongoing processes, required to be performed by the Congress and the Senate to account for the last two years and the last five years; in some manners, this goes back to March of 2016. That is more than nine years ago -- that would be one year over two Presidential terms of four years.

I have no evidence that the faith and credit of the Administration was requited by the currently identified members of Congress and the Senate. There appear to not even be derivative reportings -- in the United States -- that speak to what would be the results of such audits. What there is available either shows up in some form of "derivative reporting" in foreign countries or via the private sector -- including entities in the private sector that themselves have been under investigation or implicated in crime as of yet unprosecuted by the Judicial Brach. As of Mar 4, 2025, all members of the Judicial Branch up to the Supreme Court of the United States that qualified as Judges and/or Justices on the federal level were to be evicted for the next ten months in default of the Executive Order to publicly post and follow through on rent payments for one year until certain immediate problems were addressed and rectified. I myself also posted a public schedule with intent to follow through and did for two months, however, in the void and willful negligence -- if not outright conspiracy -- of the Judicial Branch, the materials with which I could have performed these duties were stolen while I slept on the streets myself for what now amounts to over seven years.* The requisite members of the Judicial Branch were duly and publicly informed of these matters; until this time what has been demonstrated is that refusal for the Judicial Branch domestically to take responsibility for these arrears has instead been supplanted to other countries that are themselves bearing the brunt of the cost of this malfeasance.

We are in a Constitutional void. I personally can not provide any more "faith and credit" to the People via delegation to members of the Legislative Branch, including without support from members of the Judicial Branch. I understand we have been in Constitutional void for OVER what would qualify as two full presidential terms -- alleged to be under different Presidents -- and I have done what would be necessary to comport myself Constitutionally and provide a Constitutional process to "reform or alter" the government. But, it would not be conscionable to persist in this regard now.

In 2019 I contacted the American Law Institute and told them to repudiate their role in promulgating and legitimizing the Kinsey Report on childhood sexuality as an acceptable legal reference for criminal and other consideration before the law. Until this time they have not. Instead, however, in order to get "legal support" that would be "verifiable" as "credible" before the Court I would have to site them:

https://thelehrhaus.com/scholarship/sexual-assault-a-torah-analysis-and-its-modern-implications/

I cannot and will not abide these circumstances. I should not have to go outside of my own country to find proof that my people exist still. We certainly should not be compelled to refer to sources that have REPUDIATED US and left us for more than six years without a formal response while allowing themselves and the members of their sect to be availed of the advantages.

In the Autumn of 2023 I requested that "Chief Justice Clarence Thomas" visit Fort America and provide a lecture on the Constitutional role of lawyers and attorneys as members of the Judicial Branch. This request was about more than ethics. I contended that by that time Justice Clarence Thomas may well be the "Chief Justice" and that it is a matter of public acknowledgement to allow for us to appreciate that and be availed of the benefits. What has happened in relationship to that acknowledgement is so racist I do not recognize what "country" this is supposed to be.

What has happened in regards to the racism to which members of the cabinet have been subjected does not provide me with any manner in which to recognize this "country" as my own. I contend there has been malice, opportunism and significant exploitation that has projected racist, sexist and anti-semitic acts of slander and even libel against members of the cabinet -- not just I -- and that many if not most or even ALL of them had ALREADY BEEN SECRETLY SUJBJECT TO THIS before my formal public announcement on Jan. 23, 2023. Perhaps for them it was not so secret.

It would have been prudent for those who believe they have grievances against the United States of America such that they are entitled to exercise a right to "armed struggle" to have made this official and public. Until this time I do not understand that this has been done by anyone except for myself. That I composed a Second and Thirteenth Amendment argument to this effect in July of 2020 was an example of the sort of accountability to the People I had every right to expect for others who would target me to provide; anyone they sought to target via me or in reference to me would have required this sort of acknowledgement. In over eight years no such integrity has been provided.

Lying about "medical treatment" to operationalize a biological weapons regime that targets people's genomics in void of their actual character or demonstrated ability -- including ability to make "ethical," "moral" or "legal" choices -- has been determined in the past to be a just cause for war. That includes Civil War. That also includes a just cause for proceeding in the course of such a war with an understanding that the alleged "government" and their collaborators are enjoining the People to Sedition -- if not outright Treason -- and that this alleged government is GUILTY OF WAR CRIMES AND NEEDS TO BE REMOVED BY ALL MEANS AVAILABLE.

As such I refuse to "fund" this alleged "government" and I refuse to allow for any more of my talents, capabilities, or people to be exploited to pay for it.

For the record, until this time I have never touched a firearm. I come from a family and community of people who believe in, exercise, and responsibly secure their Second Amendment rights. I have chosen until this time not to exercise my Second Amendment in the form of firearms. That right now the State of Texas has, for instance, as many states have, refused to address abuse of fraudulent diagnoses of "mental illness" yet also rescinded laws requiring licensing for firearm purchases says something insufferably corrupting about those states' concerns for our Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment and Eighth Amendment. Is it because they intend to "bid out" contracts to invoke the Third Amendment?

Void Article I.

Void Article III.

Article II is not just a "ping point" to extort other people as your "private property right" or "stake."

That will conclude these remarks.

9:52 am CST

March 12, 2025

President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse

3:24 pm CST on March 20, 2025.