Post 115: "Family Law" or "The Wedding was Dec. 4, 2025" - 5.4.2025
- charitycolleencrouse
- May 4
- 22 min read
Not Your Cossack Grandparents - 5.4.2025
"elicit a bond on my faith and credit"
Charity Colleen Crouse <charity.colleen.crouse@outlook.com>
Sep 27, 2021, 1:24 PM
to Charity, me
Is there another NYTFA bond pending?
Yes there is. See my information regarding my problems with the current issue, including the "curative" elements of, what, not addressing the pilfering of "community" property for refusal to consummate concubinage?
Was not Ludmila the name of Putin's wife?
All the references on the Bush' website from here are for Oct. 12, 2002 and the White House, but there was a picture from November of 2001 with Ludmila [accepting] a big yellow rose after getting off a train in Crawford. I found it twice; it's unmistakable.
"...[budgeting] procedures..." is what got Cypress-Fairbanks ISD busted, and what got Blackstone and their Claudaugh at PES busted.
Where is Rubio today?
https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?id=ABDD6FCB-A21B-4965-8724-6331E694BE09
He ripped this off from Yang.
This is completely like him.
It's just like the "Iron Dome."
What about "securities fraud?"
They have a casino project before their gas and oil decom?
"Rancheria?
So they pulled another Ciudad Juarez this time as well?
This is the PROOF that they let that asshole traffic children since before they hit puberty with the intent to hook up another round of children before they hit puberty to traffic:
Is this what they tried to use my federal reserve comments to "insure?"
Read it...
Country:UNITED STATES
Proposal: 1673(AF56)Risk-Based Capital Requirements for Companies Significantly Engaged In Insurance Activitie Description: Comment ID: 134431 From: Charity Crouse
No...it is not just "they're guilty."
What the fuck are YOU doing that you kept your mouth shit for this long and I am on the streets AGAIN?
1:22 pm CST
Sept. 27, 2021
/s/: Charity Colleen Crouse
from Texas Workforce Solutions on Malcolm X Drive in Dallas, TX
______________________
Charity Colleen Crouse <charity.colleen.crouse@outlook.com>
Sep 27, 2021, 3:08 PM
to me
Cut them off:
House Bill 2011 (2022) - The Florida Senate
HB 2011: Seminole State College - Altamonte Springs STEM Building B. APPROPRIATIONS PROJECT by Plakon Seminole State College - Altamonte Springs STEM Building B; Provides an appropriation for the Seminole State College - Altamonte Springs STEM Building B. APPROPRIATION: $3,640,646
House Bill 2019 (2022) - The Florida Senate
HB 2019: Escambia County Sheriff's Officer Training Simulator. APPROPRIATIONS PROJECT by Salzman Escambia County Sheriff's Officer Training Simulator; Provides an appropriation for the Escambia County Sheriff's Officer Training Simulator. APPROPRIATION: $62,500
I was over 40 at the time.
I want them all arrested in 24 hours.
You can get the subpoenas and the search warrants by midnight.
4:08 EST
Sept. 27, 2021
/s/: Charity Colleen Crouse
From Texas Workforce Solutions on Malcolm X Drive in Dallas, TX
________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Session 3 of 3.13.2025
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 13, 2025, 7:26 PM
to me
It was supposed to be milk and honey; even if you have the honey you cannot lactate.
I can. You should already have considered that prior to your gender inversion.
This ends tonight. Only one more notice needs to be provided.
Usury and concubinage.
If you thought you were eligible to enjoin me as if you can claim the privilege that was meant for my rightful husband in trying to make me mete out for who you intended to otherwise besides myself be your wife, I contend that is usurious and it was intended to be usurious at the onset. "Wives" are not to be so "loaned" out but one would loan out another woman he took as a consort or a concubine.
This has happened throughout history.
YOU decided it was acceptable to allow AGAIN for the "genocide" of my own family line to a time that predates the destruction of either temple. I am left with the burden of "conversion" in a context where prior to, though my soul may have been at the Mount, I was "exiled" and so my people had no formal knowledge until reminded. Being as I understand you are from the same lineage in one manner or another, that would NOT be acceptable or suitable as a "wife" for you to qualify for being in covenant AND YOU WOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT while I by the time we met would not. Ergo, we are still in the same dilemma. Of course, there is the falsehood of the overall historical injustice altogether, but...
YOU still expect to accord yourself BOTH the merits of what I would otherwise have offered in good faith as a wife whose husband attended his duty, even if the material conditions required improvisation, which I myself performed dutifully for almost three years in the fort, as well as that which I would have been accorded as a man. And yet, you would also do this TWICE with two different "men" otherwise suitable for me but enjoined with one another to conspire the same crime for comparable benefits. This defrauds me as well as BOTH of your "future wives" if I do not assert the claim.
I contend you both engaged in usurious scheming. I contend you owe me restitution including in a manner that will restore to me some of what would otherwise be available to my "future family" -- as now it has been over 25 years since this began insofar as I understand the alleged "formal" conditions for commencement and yet would deprive me or still more time otherwise. What is the law on taking a concubine who has engaged one in usurious scheming?
If Elliot will not immediately acknowledge he accords me full rights as first and only wife this evening, then I will take him as second concubine. If Michael attempts even one more admonishment of me or to assert ANY claim whatsoever I will take him as first concubine. I will retain what was otherwise offered -- insofar as anything left is recoverable -- and/or take what I now have and put it toward assuring a good faith offering is available for the time as it is and insofar as the offers are not exhausted with these two persons/family lines of immediacy. This is to also be understood as assuming that such "concubinage" may well have had distinctly different class/social/spiritual implications in my own "society" of this sort and that I KNOW that despite the insistence on there being permitted a representation of the "genocide" of the authentic "blood lineage" there are and always have been other contexts for consideration.
7:26 pm CST
March 13, 2025
Charity Colleen Crouse, TITLE
____________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 13, 2025, 7:38 PM
to me
And so:
"
The Prohibition against Concubinage
There are divided opinions in the codes on the question of whether the taking of a concubine is prohibited or permitted. Some of the posekim are of the opinion that neither pentateuchal nor rabbinical law forbids it, if the woman observes the rules concerning the mikveh so that the man should not cohabit with her during her period of menstruation (Rema in the name of Rabad, EH 26:1). Others are of the opinion that although it is not legally prohibited, one should refrain from taking a concubine, and they caution against her, "lest knowledge of the permissibility encourage licentiousness and sexual relations with her at a time when she is sexually unclean" (Sefer Teshuvot ha-Rashba ha-Meyuḥasot le-ha-Ramban, no. 284). The majority of the posekim, however, are of the opinion that it is forbidden to take a concubine, although they differ as to the substantive nature of the prohibition. Some are of the opinion that taking a concubine is a transgression of a prohibition of the pentateuchal law, based on the negative command: "There shall be no harlot of the daughters of Israel" (Deut. 23:18), to be punished with lashes (Rema to EH 26:1 in the name of Maimonides; Rosh, and Tur), while others expressed the opinion that the prohibition stems from a positive command of the pentateuchal law, the Torah saying, "when a man takes a wife" (Deut. 24:1) – i.e., he should take her by way of kiddushin. According to another view, the prohibition is rabbinical law only. (On the different views and their reasons, see Oẓar ha-Posekim, EH 26:3–8.) All the foregoing applies only to a woman who is unmarried; a married woman is by pentateuchal law at all times prohibited to have sexual relations with any man but her husband (issur eshet ish; see Prohibited Marriages ; Bigamy ; *Marriage ).
Since more recent times it is unanimously accepted that the taking of a concubine is prohibited: "At the present time a woman is permitted to no man except through kiddushin, ḥuppah, sheva berakhot, and ketubbah" (Radbaz, Resp., vol. 4, no. 225; vol. 7, no. 33). This applies even more in the case of a married man, in the same way as he is prohibited from taking an additional wife (see *Bigamy ), both for the protection of his wife and because his taking a concubine – since he is aware that he must not take an additional wife – can only be for the purpose of prostituting, and this is forbidden in the opinion of all the posekim (Rashba, Resp., vol. 4, no. 314; Oẓar ha-Posekim, EH 1, n. 4; 26, n. 5).
As one could see, regardless, this bad faith arrangement would subject either of us to aspersions of as involved with prostitution.
"
LEGAL CHARACTER OF PROHIBITION
It has been said that the prohibition on interest rests on two grounds: firstly, that the prosperous ought to help the indigent, if not by gifts, then at least by free loans; and secondly, that interest (or excessive interest) was seen to lie at the root of social ruin and was therefore to be outlawed in toto. Both these considerations would apply only internally: there could be no obligation to help foreigners, nor was public policy concerned with their well-being. Moreover, moneylending transactions with foreigners were motivated solely by the legitimate desire to make profits, while the internal economy was eminently agrarian and had no money markets of any importance. It follows from the charitable nature of the prohibition on interest that its violation was not regarded as a criminal offense to which any penal sanctions attached, but rather as a moral transgression; in other words, while taking interest would not entail any punishment, granting free loans and refraining from taking interest would lead to God's rewards and blessings (Deut. 23:21 and Ramban thereto). It was only in the prophecies of Ezekiel that usury came to be identified with the gravest of crimes: it is mentioned in the context of larceny, adultery, homicide, and other such "abominations" that are worthy of death (18:11–13). The threat of death for usury was later interpreted as the divine sanction against irrecoverable and illegitimate self-enrichment (BM 61b). "He that augmenteth his substance by interest and increase" is listed among the "evil men" (Prov. 28:8); while "He that putteth not out his money on interest" is among the upright and righteous (Ps. 15:5).
I contend there may well be more. Insofar as the two of you have already been permitted formal instruction and an environment within which to be provided with study of character and comportment, not only law and ritual, then to fail to provide this in good faith means that whatever one receives would not be returned in good faith and would necessarily devalue it. That would then leave what arrangement upon the "termination" of the "loan?"
I did not "consummate" a marriage in a manner that would qualify for both requirements to be fulfilled under jewish law and yet both of you intend to comport yourselves as if I did. That would mean that YOU also allowed for a representation that you comported YOURself appropriate to qualify, regardless of the male or female implication. There is a marked difference in the regard one holds for an unmarried woman versus an unmarried man; putting me into the inverse role would make of me a man who would take a qualified woman in bad faith and allow for her to be defrauded out of what she should rightfully be able to enjoy with her true husband, his family and community, and even his nation. I would not allow for a woman to be so treated and that would seem to be the "beef" between us for some ... time.
As a woman I cannot accept this either. I have not engaged in ANY sexual relation during this time, the year before, or for over eight years formally in any manner. Cognizance on these matters was not a part of the time frame prior. That would mean you asserting a cojugal right would be an act of rape. Were you to claim such rights from me that were to be otherwise accorded my husband, then that means whatever you do with them is in fraud. You would have agreed to rape a woman to claim a right as if it were for a wife, ergo, you would be to whatever community that accepted you as such a rapist of his wife.
What shall I now do with a man or men like you in MY COMMUNITY?
Please consider these points tonight.
I would advise you not to "conjugate" while you do so.
7:38 pm CST
_____________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 14, 2025, 9:15 AM
to me
I take it this is the response.
9:15 am CST
March 14, 2025
Charity Colleen Crouse, TITLE
____________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 14, 2025, 9:20 AM
to me
So is this:
.
Why?
I said yesterday before 11:30 am CST to take that blue umbrella and enter it as evidence. I recorded the vehicle number for the Dallas Police Officer that left that vehicle running while he was doing a "walk through" of the park with two "City of Dallas" personnel. After the end of the "business day" I saw the cart and the umbrella (the only two items at the site) had not been moved or touched. That means they did not at that time take the umbrella into evidence. When evidence is submitted there is 24 hours before it has to be officially recorded and inventoried. By 7:45 am CST today both the cart and the umbrella have been moved.
The umbrella better be listed into evidence by 10 am CST.
9:19 am CST
March 14, 2025
Charity Colleen Crouse, TITLE
re: Italy and its relationship to "insurance" for tobacco trade from the Virginia Colony under the Charter.
___________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 14, 2025, 9:28 AM
to me
And here's where the "gold" is supposed to be going, correct:
?
The OTHER "Epstein" story, correct?
9:28 am CST
March 14, 2025
Charity Colleen Crouse, TITLE
It was supposed to be Trinity College and the University of Chicago in 1995.
Pre-"Shira" and pre-"Mike."
____________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 14, 2025, 9:32 AM
to me
And by the way:
I already told you I am not paying for "Shira's preferred sex object's" "transgender healthcare."
This is why you should not have conflated my critiques of the state with "jewish law" in which I had not been formally instructed while you simulated "muslim process" again.
I did not agree to your "al-Golani" deal the night before last or yesterday morning.
Tomorrow is 60 days.
This is exactly what I comported myself as I did.
9:32 am CST
___________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 14, 2025, 9:49 AM
to me
So...
You mean like crawling through the sewers to escape the ghetto?
You cannot possibly think you are going to get away with this.
What purposes does it serve to "begin" Spring Break early?
...
"Insurance..."
9:48 am CST
March 14, 2025
Charity Colleen Crouse, TITLE
Re: "Arlington" and "Dallas" water and sewerage bond defaults.
UT Arlington actions were not the same as UNT.
_________________________
Are you "distressed?"
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 15, 2025, 11:00 AM
to me
Did they do the same thing to you?
You do understand that is how this has been going? I mean, if I am to believe what YOU are saying NOW that you are entitled, then are you not trying to do the same thing that was done to him to me?
Dec. 24, 2025. Did you not like me reminding you about what my "PhD" thesis was?
AND what was to be the follow-up with the women at the University?
This is not my problem. It is not fake. Trying these games where you kidnap people from my "history" and then try to "convert" them into your image and likeness under some "blood libel" claim only goes so far...
It was not any of your business what my business with Doctor Al-Azzeh was. YOU were supposed to be a professional.
The whole context for the conversation we had prior to the prenuptial agreement insofar as he was concerned was that both of you had different vantage points on what would otherwise amount to the same experience of institutionalization, including how you interact with the state relative to the state's role in institutionalization.
As I said this morning...
For the record, I understand that the evening before you allegedly "transferred" my bridal claim/husband bond with you, the determination at the rabbinic level was that Michael created "jewish concubinage" for himself in the manner in which he engaged with me for what amounts not to over 20 years and insofar as you "would have" enjoined yourself to this process by virtue of association with him and in accordance with exercising the same "options" he did with regard to trying to make me the "bride" that got "swapped out for you to get the "bride you wanted" that would mean that I worked for "seven years" to get YOU but they "swapped" you out for your "sister" and I am supposed to accept her...
except I was not "deceived" into consummation with the "sister" and you were not allowed to "swap" me for Dawn because she had children who had already been "lached onto" by the state for others to do the same to or with them.
You continuing to remand me to "service" duties under the auspices that "racial justice" is accorded through biracial children and "inheriting through the child" when you "swap" out "timeshare options" on "parentage" to claim benefits from someone else's ancestry does NOT negate what would otherwise be your constitutional duties to and before the state. You were not allowed to go along with making me "indigenous" long enough to disenfranchisement and deny my rights to due process, especially when my "indigenous" ancestors ALSO had their own constitution.
You are not allowed to make this an "Eastern rite." And Eastern rights and I are first to be negotiated relative to my history of Ala'a Al-Azzeh and his family. If he should decide he is not interested in pursuing an alliance, then that is his decision and he is to be accorded that priority. Insofar as you would be concerned, make up your mind -- you allowed this to be "brokered" under a traditional "jewish" marriage arrangement beginning last Jan. 12. I waited three days to assure that it was meant to be carried out -- I warned all involved aloud all three days just like I did about the "Irish-American Transman" beginning on Dec. 1, 2022. There was no problem -- including after they threatened Fort America -- as of the prenuptial agreement on July 18, 2024. The "problems" did not begin to "manifest" in these complaints (including in whatever manner "Elly" was supposed to be concerned) until AFTER the thefts on Aug. 15, 2024. THAT is why by Aug. 1, 2024 I affirmed the marital property delivery of the "real estate" for your family in Chicago. You were ALREADY informed that "Natalie" and "Shira" already disqualified themselves as "family" by Oct. 31, 2016 after I returned to Chicago, was compelled to stay there the entire election season of 2016, and was not permitted to even talk to them for over ten months while I was in town after seven years. It is not seven years TWICE -- there is no option for "substituting" who "would have been" my family through any arrangement you would otherwise have considered or agreed to relative to Natalie or Shira just because they have "professional qualifications" in a pooled pension fund arrangement or a shared IRS tax designation status.
My understanding is now and has been for over eight years that Dr. Al-Azzeh is married to a woman and I have not had and do not have any interest in attempting to make him party to adultery or being enjoined to any conspiracy to entertain or enjoin him into adultery. My understanding this whole time -- since October of 2019 -- is that Michael Rabinowitz is married, has been married this whole time, and I had no interest in and intention of being enjoined into adultery or allowing him to be entertained into adultery by virtue of me. My understanding is that you "were not" and had not even been married as of Jan. 12, 2024.
My understanding is that Michael made a bad arrangement through a "securities broker" with "insurance coverage" to use me and an illegal loan arrangement to launder money through their wives with promises that it would benefit them and others. I held out for over two years that this was libel -- and classically RACIST and ANTISEMITIC libel at that -- and did what would otherwise have been necessary to provide the sort of support he would have needed to be redeemed, but also commensurate with what was a realistic understandings that YOU should have understood of who he was at the time I did know him -- over 25 years ago -- and wat would have been a reasonable expectation of what he "could have been" by this this point.
There was no reasonable expectation at the time he knew me that I was supposed to be a "jewish prostitute" on the street dealing drugs and laundering money through churches. In connection with what was discoursed/discussed the evening before last after my inquiry/assertion with regard to "usury and concubinage" my understanding of what i heard as the review is that it was not acceptable to do this to me twice, that the "sin" of deception of a woman eligible otherwise for marriage in this manner only to be "turned out" as despised or disparaged is on Michael and not I, and that as far as you were concerned insofar as you "transferred" anything within the two weeks of that time, as I was to understand was affirmed the next morning, then YOU breached the arrangement and not I. I did not agree to create you as a "despised" or "whorish" wife. I did not agree to be so myself. I do not know who Tamra is. My problem has been with Judith, as they told me last year when they MURDERED all the "jewish women" as I was alleged to have "seen" the women at the BOTW to "convert" them for "resurrection" as good "Christian girls" who are not longer even allowed to be regarded as "women." Where have YOU been with advocating for our rights at this time?
The major problem here NOW is this "transfer" of "marriage" claim. In what manner were YOU allowed to "be the man" capable of "transferring" a woman's bridal suite and claim? The "story" goes now that you intend to still maintain a "bond" as if you have a "good jewish wife" who meets certain standards but I am now "transferred" off as your "concubine" to a man who is "jewish" enough to have also been subject to some form of attempt to "despise" him as a jew to show how he will comport himself with the expectation that his "redemption" -- and unfortunately, based upon the presumption of "Michael's importance" and how that impacts ENTIRE OTHER NATIONS -- will be at the cost of "scourging" me and humiliating me. Excuse me...but NOW you did EXACTLY as was anticipated, and exactly what was accused of other OVER SEVEN YEARS AGO, and you made "muslim" man the "jew" to set this up. Why would YOU believe you could claim to be a "jewish husband" -- or even a "jewish wife" -- and then "transfer" the "jewish bride" to a "muslim" man?
Ah...appearances of power. Really?
You really should have stuck with the "gay partnership arrangement" with the Irish-American transman Senator" if you thought you were going to get away with any of these "shenanigans."
This is not 'S&M' including for "commercial" as opposed to "strategic" purposes.
As I see it, Michael was already adjudged to be in error -- what he attempted to do yesterday was unjustified and he will have to be held accountable for this. As for you, if you did "agree" to "transfer" me for some "new bride" arrangement because I was just the "stock builder" for the last year, then you are the one in forfeit and not I. But if you DID transfer it then to whom and for what purpose? Does that person bear "blame" that you "transferred" the "rights of the bride" to him and then LIBELLED the bride as a "concubine" which she is not? Would he agree, including under the contexts within which I defined myself an understanding of that matter at hand, to make himself privy to accusations of "prostitutionalization" of intimacy between men and women in order to "pay" for your "debt" as a trick or pimp?
Someone else tried to do the same thing to me with fake "slave bonds" in saying I have to take in "slaves" and provide for them as slaves. See my response to Dred Scott. No. It did not happen and it will not happen.
I told you I would not slut shame you for anything you did prior to our marriage, even in the time between the prenuptial agreement meeting and the wedding. But that ended on Dec. 4, 2024. You were not allowed to "stagger" your scheme and try to "short-change" me like Michael did and keeps trying to do. I kept track of both, even the "request" to "delay" the "wedding" for a month knowing full well what they intended to do to BOTH you and I and lo and behold they made ME bear it out for BOTH OF US ON BOTH STAGGERS. But for YOU to "transfer" anything -- you were warned about this last year.
No I do not and did not "deserve" what this is.
If you are not going to stand up for YOURSELF now and demand other people KNOW this is not the sort of man you are then you never will.
There is no more to this.
By Monday we will be done with this one way or another.
10:59 am CST
March 15, 2025
Charity Colleen Crouse, TITLE
__________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 15, 2025, 11:17 AM
to me
ELLIOT:
You are dead.
YOU WERE NOT ALLOWED TO ENSLAVE THE LATINOS FOR YOUR BLACK MISTRESS AND THEN BLACKEN MY NAME TO PAY FOR YOUR SIN.
You already knew BY YOUR OWN TERMS that these crimes were eligible for punishment by execution.
I heard...you don't get to "claim" to prerogative and say that the law does not matter and then withhold the books, records, and law itself from people who strive and desire to be law abiding themselves.
Did you NOT understand what your mission this summer was?
It was not to hob-knob with "colleagues." I contended those people were responsible for CREATING MASS GRAVES OF MURDERED WOMEN IN IRAQ AND SYRIA during the times they had me personally onsite at alleged "shelters" while they were bidding me out to be kidnapped through alleged "hospitals" billing for "medical treatment" they never provided me with any records on.
YOU were supposed to DO YOUR JOB so we could CHALLENGE THE STATE. THEY needed to get OUT OF THE WAY and stop saying it was about a "workers state" or that WORKERS STATE ends up becoming the WAR CRIMINAL.
MASS GRAVES. THEY GOT PAID AT THE RATE OF THE BONES OF MASS GRAVES OF MURDERED WOMEN IN SYRIA AND IRAQ.
Three -- three different mass graves were uncovered in 2017 and 2018 ALONE! The one at the beginning of 2018 was in Iraq and they said it had been CREATED AT THE TIME I WAS AT THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS being "gamed" with another woman who is at least indigenous enough to qualify her children for the appropriate products lines.
I PAID THE TAXES FOR TWO DAYS! I was in screaming agony for two days while they "posted" their "payment" for their "workers benefits!"
Someone told me that "Syria" is alleging that USAID is responsible for Sadnaya. I contend that would only be part of the truth were it to be alleged. It is not JUST about Sadnaya...
I know...you and the "real jews" were nearly "genocided" but what would ever make anyone think it was okay to just go ahead and let SOMEONE ELSE BEAR THE GENOCIDE BOND FOR A SECOND TIME INSTEAD!?
Apparently, all you did is "waive off" your obligations to create their "Holocaust stock" onto someone else.
I told all of you last evening and MONTHS ago to STAY AWAY FROM SYRIA!
It has NOTHING to do with you! You are not allowed to "ethnic/race" shop around with them...
How much more needs to be said?
11:17 am CST
March 15, 2025
Charity Colleen Crouse, TITLE
_________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 15, 2025, 11:40 AM
to me
Did you hear what they said? September 2024...
I see...
DID YOU AGREE TO LET TED CRUZ QUALIFY AS JEWISH ENOUGH TO CLAIM ME AS A LOAN FOR YOUR JEWISH RITE?
Were these people bid at "pork futures" or "beef futures?"
Given the HOLOCAUST references it would be "pork" correct?
Are you going to pretend you did not hear on the evening of Dec. 31, 2024 to Jan. 1, 2025?
Are you?
DID YOU MAKE A DEAL WITH TED CRUZ AROUND SOME JEWISH WRIT OF EXCEPTION OUT OF BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR MURDERING OTHER JEWS TO CLAIM YOUR OWN JEW STOCK AND TO DISTRIBUTE JEW STOCK TO YOUR CHRISTIAN ZIONIST SUPPORTERS?
Let us continue...
No...you abused the writ process to get an exception out of prosecution by MURDERING THE WITNESSES AND MURDERING THE PROSECUTOR.
Did you do the same thing in Ukraine first?
Or did you just "effectively murder" them through seven years plus of "political disappearance" so now you can claim you are in "King David's bloodline" in Syria?
I know...you WANT to "swap" it for "Egyptian" rates to bring back the ancient Ogdoad with Natalie...
But you were ALREADY TOLD in December of 2019 THAT WAS NOT ALLOWABLE!
Continuing...
So...everyone's wearing radiographic film now?
That's because the "church" intercessed...
When did they set up the "plasma wall" in the "park" next door?
Around the same time, didn't they?
Did you hear what she said? So it's undergraduate level antisemitism...
This is the deal that Cruz set up when he went to Mexico with the "nuclear football" after the report from the American Pediatrics Institute about the 14,461 "children dead by COVID 19" in 2020...
And they have found how many bodies from Ayotzinapa?
I heard the whole thing at the time.
Why did you not say anything when it was "Cruz's" in Honduras involved with "radio journalism" and "tribal leadership?"
How many measles cases do they have in Texas right now?
Are we NOT at 239?
No...259...
That is one short of 260.
So...again you "diseased" your women...
What am I to say?
11:39 am CST
__________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Mar 15, 2025, 11:46 AM
to me
Abu Khadijah?
You mean MJ?
Did you let MJ take the other "ranch?"
And she MURDERED people left and right for their "jewish minerals?"
And you would have let her because SHE was YOUR idea of a "leader?"
I mean..."older woman" you all championed since "the 1980s?"
Did ANY of you read the Baker-Hamilton Plan? Did ANY of you listen to Jimmy Carter?
No. YOU ALL MURDERED HIS FIRST LADY AND LIED ABOUT IT THE WHOLE TIME.
Jimmy Carter is ALSO dead now.
Now, for the record, this falls on the Supreme Court prior to "Ketanji Jackson Brown" but if this is a "bad advertisement" for the benefits packages she agreed to automate for her local kickback scheme I am going to have to hold her responsible for her later accomplicement in that "Sicilian job."
Your "blood moon terror" reign from October of 2015 is over.
11:45 am CST
March 15, 2025
Charity Colleen Crouse, TITLE
_________________________
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Apr 14, 2025, 12:33 PM
to me
I mean you all just didn't get it:
12:32 pm CST
April 14, 2025
President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy 32" Crouse, Deceased
And yet...
You BOTH picked a VERY BAD IDEA.
_________________________
As a prelude to what otherwise came up after sundown last evening
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
10:48 AM (3 hours ago)
to me
I acknowledged what I heard on the "subcurrent" the night before (May 2, 2025) regarding both Elliot Feldman and Ala'a Al-Azzeh. At this time I will not put more into electronic format. I do understand, however, that around this time last year the controversy of concern was not about Al-Azzeh, but about Robyn Epstein in a situation of being comparably accused with respect to me and if what was said on May 2, 2025 that would mean Feldman agreed AFTER this time last year to commit himself to that which he was concerned about for himself relative to what was engaged with "regard to" Epstein. That itself is comparable to what was held forth regarding "Hassan" and "Mintz" in autumn of 2019 (with no mention of Rabinowitz) with regard to Al-Azzeh and I.
I am concerned this has more to do with the "Classified House Intelligence Committee" meeting from June of 2022 (about which I publicly informed people I heard AT THE TIME and now has counterfeit information in regards to) and that this may well be libel, including in connection with the crimes of "CBD" and "Jewish biologics."
Otherwise what both "Cruz" and "Zelenskyy" did last evening would be covered under the same considerations of "jewish concubinage" about which I already deliberated. I have not changed my opinion or assessment.
I mean what I said -- this would have been over last evening and today we would be addressing the consequences of the fact that we literally took action last night in accordance with what was already the judgment.
10:45 am CST
May 4, 2025
President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse
BOTH of these:
Are crimes and I already told you how and why and what should already have been done about it.
Everything otherwise and even still was reconciled before Feb. 6, 2025 with what was stolen on Feb. 7, 2025, including the manifest/receipt for the "lend-lease" and what was used in the Battle of Kursk.
.
2:04 am CST
May 4, 2025
President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse
________________________________________________________________________________
What? You were not satisfied with making the "compost toilet" outlay yesterday?
2:12 pm CST
May 4, 2025
President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse
The names were NOT changed to protect against libel.
Comments