Post 164: 31 Days After Six Months After Sept. 18, 2025 - 4.18.2026

Where is **-***? - 4.18.2025

In October of 2018, I found **-***. It was dated originally for Oct. 29, 2018. That is the birthdays of both my younger sister and my father. I found it the day before. It was later revised – twice – once on October 28, 2019 and then again on April 15, 2021. On April 15, 2021 I was in the library and I was reading a biography of Margaret Thatcher. I turned to exactly what I needed which was dated for April 15 of another year. It prepared me for what I found the next day. Someone else was online the next day and I heard them. They were not allowed to “sit in my seat” and attempt to “drive” me and MISS that deadline. I contend I did NOT based upon the previous day’s events offline. It was a “deal-breaker.” In no way did I ever consent to allowing for a person who was NOT born in the United States to “assume my seat” in the course of me tracking government records and attempt to “entice” me. The overtly sexist nature of these efforts is one factor; that it involved a person who was either literally or “via proxy” sanctioned by the Office of Foreign Asset Control as one of 39 persons who were sanctioned from Belarus in December of 2019 is the other. 

The OFAC notice was online in December. I heard at the time what was to be done with it. Within six months it was no longer online and has not appeared again. Based upon what I heard I contend it is comparable to other items that appeared online for some time and that by July of 2020 started “disappearing” or appearing in a materially altered context “as if” an official government record thereafter. There was an announcement (as I have discussed elsewhere) that two Senators said that President Trump had “declassified” material from the Mueller Investigation but I contend that did NOT explain how between the end of June and the beginning of July of 2020 many things that were official government records began to “re-appear” after being offline for from between three and ten days did so in a manner wherein information contained therein was materially altered so as to create a ”forgery” or a “counterfeit” of the original. I had “evidence” of this in the 11 thumb drives I had in my locked filing cabinet before it was stolen on Sept. 21, 2021. 

It was said within the last three days that there was a “different standard” for **-***. False. There was another document: ****************************************************

I found this at the same time I found **-***. In the downloadable pdf form it was dated for May 15, 2018. That means I would not have found it on May 15, 2018 – I “would have been” late. This is too literal and too specific. I have at least two references to **-*** in my spreadsheets and both have been “404”ed. Why? It was not this way before Sept. 12, 2025. I had written a report in April of 2020 in preparation for following through on items that were identified in the 2009 Appropriations bill that I contended needed to be engaged in connection with what was already appropriated and by that time – 11 years later – should well have been implemented as a “first response” to “COVID-19.” There was a 15-day timeline and then another 45-day timeline. I followed the process in the appropriations bill, however, at that time, the respective committees did NOT have a direct way to contact the committee. I used an alternative method by contacting a Congressman from Texas that was a member of the House Committee and metric-correlated with the items in the bill. He never responded but I kept track of the process. In order to meet the 15-day deadline I reviewed **-*** and wrote a report both assessing my initial observations of what was applied at the time and how I understood **-*** had already outlined an appropriate response, including in a manner that would have comported with the express items in the appropriations bill of concern. As I have said before this was the appropriations bill I was reviewing in Autumn of 2008 during the 2008 election while I worked for Green Party Congressional Candidate Omar Lopez (G-4) in Illinois.

As it is at this point, there are two outstanding matters that I contend should not be compounded by political ambitions in the Middle East that are directly correlated with matters still outstanding from 2009 that were exacerbated during the initial response to COVID-19:

1. Matters pertaining to “border security” and “immigration” that included contractor exceptions around “technology development” via the Transportation Security Administration; and

2. Matters that have been exacerbated with regard to what is now the “War in Ukraine” and how that correlates with concerns from the 2008 election with regard to how it correlates with Number 1.

Firstly, the matters pertaining to Belarus are a concern for me personally because I contend that my 2016 election campaign was allowed to be used in connection with the 2020 election in Belarus. I made public notice of my understanding at the time and my concern that “foreign funding” originating in the United States was in part responsible. In that regard, I had stated that if within a 60-day period the candidate who contended she had been defrauded during the election made public statements specific to what and in what manner she meant she had “won the election” then I would support her. However, no such announcement in any context had been made. I contended that HAD SHE done so that it would have been precedent setting. The allegations of “election interference” with regard to the U.S. elections of 2008 were not anomalous; I had later experiences with not only the off-term legislative elections but also with regard to the election in Pakistan following an earlier “election interference” episode in early 2017 with regard to Northern Ireland. I do not believe that the incident in Northern Ireland is related to Belarus but that the matters pertaining to Pakistan may well have been. I contended that I was “remote witness” to what I understood real-time was an effort to “assassinate” the Prime Minister of Pakistan on what turned out to be the day of his swearing in and I was not and am not certain it originated entirely in the United States. I attempted to contact the Embassies in both Pakistan and India with regard to this after contacting what I understood were government officials in the United States. 

I have contended since the announcement in early 2021 that Belarus may well be being used in connection with the verdict in the case that Poland filed with Gazprom and that Ukraine was selected in regard to how Russia determined it was going to address the verdict. I also contend that this has to do with matters still outstanding with regard to both World War II, but originating in the War Reparations Conference of 1919-1921. For the first two years of the Ukraine War – until the Ukrainian incursion into Kursk – this was consistent, but the battle of Kursk in July of 2024 altered the context for the consideration around these matters and not just on my part or in my own analysis. At that time the information available in the United States materially changed and “backdated” information earlier available. Also, by that time locally, there was no longer any “record” accessible about “Ukraine” following the “demise” of the USSR and that has yet to be reconciled. It was at that time that any records I had were stolen (June 28, 2024 through July 10, 2024) that included books that were written about early Ukrainian nationalism as well as other materials specific to events involving the Ukrainian SSR. There has been no “replacement” yet of these records and there is a “void” in what can now be found at publicly available facilities (this is not exclusive to the Ukraine War or with regards to the former USSR; the same has happened locally in my area with regard to first Iran and then Israel/Palestine). 

As I have said, those who now claim “we didn’t know” still have yet to identify who they are but they “use” the same sorts of biometric accounts and “identify” as if they are the same persons. These persons already have had access to substantial written – including hand-written -- material, including that was kept exclusively offline, as well as electronic records of my tracking in the context of correlations with regard to domestic policy matters. The specific concerns regard to correlations between the Department of Defense and the Department of State following – mostly – Legislative process on the federal level. This is not a “war game.” It is also consistent with “revisionism” that is against federal law with regard to official electronic government records and acts of “theft” or "burglary” that I contend have demonstrated that whoever believed themselves to be better suited to “possess” this “property” are in fact not qualified to do so. 

I do not believe that now is the time for the United States to be in the “Middle East” attempting to assert policy with regard to the situation therein. I have already asked for “alibis” of those who were “on my bandwidth” with regard to the following time frames:

May of 2022

September of 2022

October of 2022

.

Why?

December of 2000 and the impact of Feb. 4, 2021. 

It is NOT POSSIBLE for persons who hold themselves forth as qualified to represent the American people in an official government office to say now that they DID NOT KNOW AT THE TIME that what they were planning and WHAT THEY ACTUALLY DID THEN was not only unconstitutional but a WAR CRIME. This is not excepted out of but also not specifically related to my charges in my state or federal petitions. These were specific matters that were in effect but exacerbated by “COVID-19” and “COVID-19” and its response did NOT provide a justification for doing what was planned at the time and is still being followed through on. 

The “invasion” of “Gaza” was planned by September of 2022. I did not understand at the time HOW but I knew that it was. Other things were “planned” at the above-referenced times that were KNOWN AT THE TIME TO BE UNACCEPTABLE and have been “playing out” events since. This includes what transpired on Dec. 31, 2024 and the announcement in the first week of January of 2025 about the “closure” of “super-detention centers” in the United States prior to the swearing in of Donald Trump for a second non-contiguous term. We already went through a period of “mandatory detentions” before, during and after the 2008 election; there was no excuse. The announcements about “Alligator Ally”/”Alligator Alcatraz” were ALREADY INTENDED TO mitigate against understood blowback with regard to what the United States did in Syria. When I say “it was already planned in December of 2024” this is EXACTLY what I meant. No “horror” or attempted libel or “shaming” of me changes that. The six-month “ban” was unjustified but so too was more than four and a half years with no legal identification documentation and nowhere indoors to sleep, much less even go to the bathroom.

Locally enough “evidence” “on the street” demands that the United States focus internally on major crimes that have already been proven to be too extreme to justify American “intervention” in another country. The recent abduction and detention of President Ricardo Maduro of Venezuela is too far gone to justify attempting to “foreign broker” another country’s response. The alleged “spiritual dimensions” of this lack ANY credibility after nearly two decades of muslim-bashing that it seems served to “soften up” the country for “jew-bashing” that now gets subsumed in remonstrations of specific alleged “Christian praxis” that target dissenting Christians. This is totally unfounded – we did not make an agreement to form an “American Al-Qaeda” in Christian-face and justify alleged “Christian-Jewish Socialism” that tried to parade tyranny as “socialism” while DISAPPEARING THE HISTORY OF ACTUAL SOCIALISM in the United States – even at the literal National Archives.

Is it true that “2 million” women went “missing” or “dead” in the “Middle East” in the last five years? Did they? And how many in the U.S.? Is it true that there are literally “mass graves”  near “secret detention centers” in the U.S. and that they attempted to contract to construct a “secret mega detention center” along the U.S. Mexico border this past Autumn? Am I correct that in at least one area that public action has…cancelled that contract, including in the last month? How many other such centers are there? Just the ”evidence” herein confounds one with even a modicum of reason. 

We were NOT allowed to put into effect a “lend-lease” with Ukraine to “harvest Ukrainian minerals” as if they were “jewish” minerals to compel a “conversion” to “Christian” minerals in Ukraine and say that it was not … satisfying enough. The “mineral pact” with Ukraine was entirely extortionate and unconscionable. Whoever tries to say this is about “civil rights” in the U.S., the “streets” or “older women” as some long-term obligation DOES NOT ACTUALLY LIVE THE LIVES THEY ARE TRYING TO DIVEST. No, I said “live” the lives because HOW MANY WOMEN JUST IN THE U.S. ARE MISSING NOW FROM FIVE YEARS AGO? The “women” who are left are what in that “equation?”

I do not consider this in ANY MANNER to be about a “sex economy” or “sex trade” and that issuing punitive measures to effect punitive action against “sexually noncompliant persons” qualifies ONLY AS A WAR CRIME, including as rape, regardless of whether it regards men or women or trans-identified persons. If I am correct, this matter was literally addressed in November of 2024 through a formal proceeding with international scope and implications and what has been since ongoing is an effort to “escalate” belligerence in order to deter others from enforcing the sentence. This is not only VERY DANGEROUS it is entirely unacceptable. 

We have to deal with what the role of the United States is in exploiting the situation with regard to Russia, Ukraine, The Donetsk People’s Republic and the Luhansk People’s Republic rather than trying to “spread the shame” to other countries, whether Venezuela or countries of the Middle East. Is it true that “conditions” have been met sufficient to say that six countries right now are eligible for consideration as “genocided?” This has changed in just the last seven months. To start, we need to address what happened in July of 2024 relative to what happened in July of 2020. My specific concern was Russia’s initial announcement that it supported the "right to self-determination” for the DPR and the LPR and then later after July of 2020 stated it had “annexed” them and that by virtue of the Ukrainian incursion into Kursk Ukraine had thereafter become “responsible” for the welfare of Russia – which would mean her “annexes.” This is comparable with what has happened locally – regardless of where the actual literal persons of concern are from – insofar as American citizens and others in the course of obtaining American citizenship are being allowed to be “proxied” as if they are persons from another country and “rotated” sometimes several times a DAY! Is this happening throughout the entire country? 

I am additionally concerned that since the assassination of Solemani in Iraq and the later announcement of the downing of the Ukrainian airliner in Iran that Iran has taken to using the Ukraine as a sort of “human shield” with regards to its own political interests, including in an effort to attempt to justify its use because of the extremity of the situation in which Iran finds itself and that this is being exploited. My concern is that the assassination of Solemani is actually part of a treasonous domestic campaign that violates the most fundamental elements of the Constitution, including as it avails itself of trafficking, kidnapping, blackmail, extortion and other crimes against American citizens who have families members active-duty or retired from the United States Armed Forces. I am aware that the methods to do so may ALSO be being used to commit the same crimes against Ukrainian citizens specifically, including women office holders or former office holders, as a means to replicate the process. 

Eugenics is no justification. That there has been regime change in Syria in the last year and a quarter and that the former President of Syria at least before September of 2025 was in Russia compounds this but should not be used as a diversion. As I have said before, even if the “new regime” agrees to “gloss over” what happened at Sadnaya and other locations of comparable sort in Syria I know what was done and KNOW that it is connected to what we are doing domestically that has now FOR OVER 10 years specifically but in closer to 25 years is being intentionally covered up.  I am not interested in anyone’s “psycho-emotional analysis” of what I do or do not “hear” about alleged acts of libel of me, including via pornography that may be illegal surveillance of actual intimate activities in which I was engaged at one point or may be fabricated. I have never lied about who I am and “fag-bashing” me or accusing me of “traitorism” for not “performing queer” acceptable to someone else’s standard is the character flaw of the consumer. Speculating on “marital relations” futures options of me or another via me is the fault of the consumer.  Any pornographic obligation or nonconsensual performance of a person is a character flaw of the consumer. It is also ILLEGAL and a WAR CRIME. How much more clear can that be made?

There is “another possibility” herein but again, for the record, until my legal identity documents are returned and I am given my keys and the documents to the home I ALREADY BOUGHT and a schedule I AM UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO DO MORE THAN I HAVE. THAT was the purpose for the “strike.” If no one else can address my “material deprivation” with the resources they have then I am in no way obligated – after more than 7 years in some cases thrice over – to accept they have any more “authority” than I. I do not consider this status quo to be “revolutionary” but it is imperative that the appearance of condoning this is repudiated as utterly, consistently and practically as possible.

2:06 pm CST

April 18, 2026

Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse

It says this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-8HmzxhZnQ&pp=ugUHEgVlbi1VUw%3D%3D

Was posted six minutes ago.

Is this connected to what was discussed last night regarding “serial numbers” and “domestic consumption” versus export to be made available for “foreign consumption?”

So there are 15 – at least – foreign-produced automatic rifles in the last two days? 

By today? Seven years after April 18, 2018? One day before April 19, 2018?

Re: Jan. 20, 2026 through Jan. 27, 2026.

You were not going to tell us?

2:11 pm CST

April 18, 2026

Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse

_________________________

2:53 pm CST

April 18, 2026

Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse