Post 187: PENSION HEDGE - p. 147 "Inspectors" by 9 pm CST on Day 45 - 5.25.2026
- charitycolleencrouse
- May 26
- 8 min read
Per Secretary Feldman et al.
Inbox
Case From Black and White Book Jan. 4, 2026 - 4.29.2026
Five Cases - 5.9.2026
Porsche/Investigation of SMU and Context
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Apr 27, 2026, 9:44 AM
to me
In December of 2024 I apprised "Elliott" that I was not an acceptable "witness" or "party" to any case he may be engaged in regarding "compensation" or other matters regarding he and his colleagues and I Identified why. There were three primary reasons I stated I was a conflict of interest and ineligible:
1) Were he and I in a "lateral" work relationship? I contended that my work at the SFDPH would not qualify me "on his level" and my duties as a civil service employee in that position were counter to what was stated as the objectives discussed in regards to his case;
2) If I were a "patient" and allowed to be considered "mentally disabled" then that would disqualify me, including insofar as I would be considered a "control" for persons who have to intersect with institutions in the context in which their "mental competency" would be examined; and
3) If we were not in a "lateral" position and instead I would be "in authority" over him, including via the Executive Branch functions of our respective offices, then whatever could or would be considered my "culpability" would have to be assessed through the appropriate and legislatively authorized processes; any effort to engage me in an "administrative proceeding" at that point or a "judicial proceeding" at that point would put me in a potentially adversarial position, one which I would not be eligible to position myself in if the other two were the "parameters" around which I would be assessed for my qualifications in the stated proceeding of concern.
The "Attorney General of the United States" by that point would already have been cooperating with the Secretary of Health and Human Services with OTHER priorities and would have to assess whether the stated case was an attempted obstruction OR if it was party to what would otherwise be required given the magnitude of the situation at the time.
Additionally, I had already stated that in accordance with the summer [July 1, 2024 through Aug. 31, 2024] investigation/audit that specific concern would have to be given to anyone in an academic program at the time, including as an instructor, researcher or research leader, and their compliance with the requirements under the Mansfield Amendment. IF in fact anyone had waived their rights to be protected from the Department of Defense using any of their research for development of defense articles or paradigms then that was to be considered independently of those who had not. THAT was a MAJOR element of the "staff" and "personnel-related" concerns that were to be attended to during the first of the four phases of the investigation/audit [1: July 1-15, 2024; 2: July 16-31, 2024; 3: Aug. 1-15, 2024; 4: Aug. 16-31, 2024]. That was the primary reason why following the "case" from December of 2023 and January of 2024 (which involved first the Department of State and THEN the Department of Defense) that the Secretary of Defense was NOT to be officially consulted until October 1, 2024 with BOTH the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Attorney General. He was to then be given two month -- which "would have been" October and November of 2024 [--] before commencing in December of 2024 and onward as necessary.
I considered this at the highest level of "national security" and took precautions commensurate with the need. I did at ALL TIMES understand -- not just "believe" -- it was THAT important THE WHOLE TIME. Following the discussion regarding the "case" from mid-December of 2024 I did "remind" the "Secretary of Health and Human Services" that a major element brought up in October of 2024 was the role of "Academic Journals" and publication of research and the manners in which the "rights" -- including proprietary as well as civil and Constitutional rights -- of "subjects of research["] were considered and protected to guard against a form of "black market" economy exclusive to "academics" using the "property" or "violations of rights" of "subjects" for their "political" and other "economy." I did WARN that were that NOT to be attended to diligently -- including in regards to, say, online journals that would not require academic credentialing to qualify for publication -- then there would "accrue" a need to "investigate" these journals. That would necessarily call into [question] overall in regards to the universities themselves. I did NOT consider this to be acceptably refuted as a "workers' rights" issue for persons employed in "academia." The Attorney General would have made as excellent source of information on this point specifically and you would also have had the at-the-time Co-President to assist with your concerns. I, however, [am] not "qualified" as they are to "support" you or others and yet "we" are similarly protected under the Constitution in pursuing a redress of our rights insofar as violations of them may be made evident.
Now, again, is the time to consider that last paragraph. This was already "up for consideration" by March 11, 2026 and following March 15, 2026 AND April 15, 2026 pertinent. I am apprising you now of the implications including insofar as the announcement this morning regarding the last several weeks work on "pension obligations" has become pertinent in the manners it has.
For the record, "domestic research and development" -- including in the health care sector and the behavioral sciences sector -- is not appropriate for "contracting" or "brokering["] through USAID. I have already stated my concerns and put into "praxis" a method for analyzing appearances of abuses via the "private security sector" -- including in and as regards the "private security" sector and its relationship to the "private military corporation" sector. I have comported myself accordingly. These concerns were NOT to be "reconciled" with or through the Department of State until what "would be" around now. Anything that transpired in the last year attempting to prioritize the "Department of State" of "personnel" for the Department of State will be responded to as a matter for review through the "Department of Justice" and appropriate Congressional inquiry.
Any relationship with the Department of Treasury was better suited for the U.S. [Marshals'] Service rather than any pretense of or as "Secret Service" -- including insofar as I or any "family member" -- including "spouse" -- should be concerned.
Thank you very much for you efforts. I do still regard any specific maligning or impugnment on your "character" as it would be affected by projections of your race, ethnicity, gender or sexual preference as I have already alerted you I did. Please recall, however, that as a government official you are ONLY permitted to carry a handgun and are not allowed to be accorded the protections of a state official under international law if you are armed with anything more and any and everyone else we would encounter is comparably to be considered. This includes -- I contend -- as regards any chemical, biological or electronic weapon. If you have need for a [Marshal's] escort or other services it is already available. For the record, I do not consider a "canine" law enforcement officer a "biological weapon."
9:44 am CST
April 27, 2026
Co-President Charity Colleen "[Lovejoy]" Crouse
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Apr 27, 2026, 3:18 PM
to me
Now here's the thing -- after whatever was supposed to be the 3:00 "reservation" I can only hear him linearly if I look up and to the left. What does that mean?
It makes me understand that the first language on the background is not only not English but NOT written from left to right, am I correct?
3:17 pm CST
April 27, 2026
Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse
Attachments area
Preview YouTube video UN: Many of the violent conflicts around the world involve private military and security companies
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
Apr 28, 2026, 3:52 PM
to me
And..."life-saving drugs."
31 days today.
What will be 30 before the QE.
And, excuse me, every year?
Ok...
The "round-up" suit STILL needs to factor in the matters pertaining to "GMO opium" in Afghanistan and my SERIOUS concern that we are dealing with...GMO cocaine, including in "Mexico" and also "Honduras." I am serious. I was supposed to discuss this further with Co-President Dawas. WHY ARE YOU DEMANDING I DIVEST YOU STOCK?
Is that NOT what they just addressed "on the street?"
For the record, what happened before I was "off the ban" did NOT seem to be as concerning as what just happened. Why not?
I am not in a position to discuss "techniques" of this sort with you -- I was SUPPOSED to discuss this with others AFTER YOU DISCUSSED WITH THEM WHAT YOU NEEDED TO DISCUSS AND YOU WOULD THEN BE A PART OF IT WHEN IT CAME UP.
You do understand, of course.
3:52 pm CST
April 28, 2026
Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse
Chalmers Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com>
May 6, 2026, 4:11 PM
to me
And of course:
you understand why it is "over" between us.
Yes, the same thing as Mike, and apparently Robyn and Shira, and also...Natalie.
Luring me to California for:
my "sister" to get to me for my "father" was a very bad idea.
They were not allowed to "swap" the standards.
Make sure you "get" that now.
4:10 pm CST
May 6, 2026
Co-President Charity Colleen "[Lovejoy]" Crouse
I knew at "FTAA on copyrighted materials" in 1999.
Do not pretend any more.
Chalmers Charity Crouse
1:53 PM (8 minutes ago)
to me
No.
You and your "colleagues":
are not allowed to use your "opinions" on my "mental health" status while I am denied my rights to due process and you say my "dreams" are benefits and compensation for you and I am forced to sleep outside.
What did you NOT get about how important that "inspection" was now nearly two years ago?
It does not matter to me that, what, 60 days ago they published the "rates" for their "insurance exchange" that they put ME at relative to...whom? YOU? And "them?"
If YOU are a "28" and I am a "28" then you do not get to "overcall" my work and tell me to go to the back of the line again.
But, who was in the "class" together to begin with?
Today is Day 13...
Were you expecting to let "Dawn" get her "hedge of protection" on me and now THEY GET PAID WITH FIRST DIBS ON EXHUMATIONS OF MASS GRAVES?
What did YOU NOT get about how important that "inspection" from July through August of 2024 was BEFORE DECEMBER OF 2024 WHEN THEY SET IT UP TO ACTUALLY GET THEIR COMPENSATION AND THEIR HEALTHCARE PRIORITIES RE-INSURED ON ACTUAL MASS GRAVES IN SYRIA?
Where RIGHT NOW is the Energy Omnibus Act of 2006?
WHERE IS IT?
Why would it NOT be YOUR responsibility to KNOW how to answer this question and be able to answer it on a moment's notice?
Did the "Secretary of State" say you had "immunity" from "anthrax?"
What about "ricin?"
Because the Energy Omnibus Act of 2006 is just as "missing" as the reports on use of sarin in Syria were before you...called in your "put" on the "loan" on what "would have been" the bridal claim of your Chief Executive!
If you had THAT KIND of problem with my "leadership" then you SHOULD HAVE SAID that was the problem and not...something else.
You cannot tell me I am still obligated to a "CASH MANAGEMENT" strategy when you allow them to DESTROY the notes that designated how much CASH there was to begin with.
For the record:
1) Social Security Disability Insurance
2) MediCare/MediCaid
3) Savings Accounts with deposit of SSDI check
4) Checking Accounts, including with Direct Deposit from legal employment
5) Tax Return
are NOT "CASH MANAGEMENT" notes and not "legal tender" for "conversion."
It "would have been" at 25 days that the Perot Museum had a "booth" right here at the library.
Excuse me?
1:52 pm CST
May 26, 2026
Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse
No. This is not about "right to choose." Yes, it is "already set up" and ALL YOU ALL CONTINUE TO DO IS EVADE RESPONSIBILITY FOR SETTING IT UP.
_________________________________
2:16 pm CST
May 26, 2026
Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VV9Y8IYS9W4&pp=ugUEEgJlbg%3D%3D.
And what again did YOU say about your "sweepstakes?"
Gambling on Jesus' crucified body with no clothes on has its costs.
6:31 am CST
May 26, 2026
Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse