top of page
Search

Post 188: “Experiment” in “Study” - 5.26.2026

  • Writer: charitycolleencrouse
    charitycolleencrouse
  • May 26
  • 2 min read


Begin 1545 CST:


Re:

Feb. 1, 2026

[Feb. 5, 2026]

Feb. 8, 2026


2.1.2026 and 2.8.2026 were discussed this morning, with direct citation. The citation in context is a primary source. The queries regarded:


  1. Operation Cobra [I]

  2. Operation Cobra II

  3. Operation Urban Shield

  4. Operation Jade Helm


As of this morning, by 7:14 am CST do you know what are the above four?


If not then you are NOT qualified to “sit” at the table, even if the “table” is in a McDonald’s.


If you “bought back”/”took back”/”recovered” anything from what was STOLEN from me in the last over four years then there is NO EXCUSE at ALL for you to try to say I owe YOU ANYTHING or that you are entitled to ANYTHING I have done unless you can answer those questions.


If you WERE at the table and YOU knew something that was as relevant as the above were/are, then I “would have been” required to do “work” in informing myself so as necessary I would be able to respond.


What else is there to say?


I had one of the primary source reference materials with me AT THE TABLE as the question of concern at this time came up this morning. Who was at the “table” with me?


YOU pretending YOURSELF to be eligible to make demands of me at MY TABLE (even at the McDonald’s) interferes with with WHOM I AM supposed to be speaking and what I NEED to do my “work.” What has NOT been appropriately communicated about this in all these years, all these thefts, all these emails (even if the accounts on which they were transmitted were stolen, reported to various federal agencies without response, and not available to YOU because YOU NEVER CONTACTED ME AT MY EMAIL AND LEFT ANY COMMUNICATIONS THAT YOU HAD ANY “interest.”


Can you find this “information” online right now:


Begin “experiment”:


  1. Operation Cobra [I]

Do you consider this source credible? It was the first reference on my google search. What have you been doing for the last more than three months?

  1. Operation Cobra II

Do you consider these credible sources? These are not my sources at this time. The first is in the bag next to me; it was the second source on this topic, the first being the “public library” in February of 2019; the other in the “book at the bookstore down the street.”

  1. Operation Urban Shield

Do you consider these to be credible sources?

Do you recognize the above pattern? From what? When?

My primary source reference was identifiable in the fifth result.

  1. Operation Jade Helm

Do you consider these credible sources?

Do you believe that I am required to reveal to you what else I just found? 

I will not.

I queried “Jade Helm map.”


It is 3:58 pm CST on May 26, 2026. Print this out and bring it with you – at the least. You cannot receive ANY credit for “preparation,” prevention” or “preparedness.” We will discuss what IS available.


________________________________



Stop.


4:05 pm CST

May 26, 2026

Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse






 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Post 202: Post Transhumaneconomics - 6.4.2026

Is something missing? ____________________________ 3 of 11 Is it going to get through? Charity Crouse <crouse.charitycolleen@gmail.com> Sep 19, 2020, 8:10 PM to kevin I used to be a journalist and edi

 
 
 
Post 201: Prize Fight Winner - 6.3.2026

Re: Prize Fight - 6.3.2026 (yes…that would be like the “lobby” with the game shows for your undisclosed-at-the-time “King of Prussia” way…) Bag 1: Barton Greenville (by 5:20 pm CST on 4.27.2026) https

 
 
 
Post 200: Happy 9th Birthday! - 6.2.2026

Today is exactly nine years since what came to be identifiable as Cause No. wr-87,139-01was "born" at the Texas Supreme Court. It was ACTUALLY "born" at the Texas Supreme Court, but after June 12, 201

 
 
 

1 Comment


Crouse.charitycolleen
May 26
Like
bottom of page