"Sovereign Wealth" and the role of the Judiciary - 5.3.2024

See addition as of Feb. 28, 2025 below.

So I “built” Trump tower. Based on the contexts within which it was built and has persisted, I am not eligible for Moscow, but I am eligible to build comparable towers in Kiev and Budapest. Someone wants to say there is an option for Damascus, but there is a dispute as to whether that would be a third “option” based upon the other two or a “swap” regarding Budapest. My eligibility is attended to based upon another person who at the time had contributions but is now eligible for consideration in the recently completed plan for “public education reform” and the context for protection of youth “intangible and made-as-tangible” property from their primary and secondary schooling years. (That was completed yesterday by 12:40 pm CST – May 2, 2024 [in development formally since October of 2017, January/February of 2018, and posted publicly on Jan. 19, 2019 after being composed on Jan. 18, 2019 – based on a ten-year obligation that is now 10 months short of completion]).

In the context of these matters is appropriate public works as a base for not only local revenue but also taxation to minimize the possibility for exploitation of human capital that can be developed into and circulated as political capital locally. This can provide not only a basis for needed revenue to the city/political subdivision of the state (as opposed to federal works or state projects that receive federal assistance) and can also provide a base for appraisal of local property. This is also important is revising the standards regarding maintenance of works and facilities, including as regards to roles of inspections and audits, and the potential appreciative or ad valorem aspects of public works, regularly maintained, and regularly inspected with on-time progress reports insofar as repairs or modifications are necessary. In the matters pertaining to public and private, consideration must first attend to the role of union labor on large-scale infrastructure projects, including specific expertise, and local hire requirements versus the context of consideration of specific expertise, and how this also correlates with the manners in which equipment that is used may be owned by individual persons (including as corporate) or by the union in consideration of the storage, transport, bonding and insurance of the equipment. This will be necessary in also establishing contexts within which to address contractor participation and the roles of contractors of their own labor with unions and collective representation of workers in a common project.

These contexts will also have to entail occupational health matters, including not only workers safety, but the impact of the project on the surrounding area and the health care implications of the project during its construction but also as pertains to matters relating to the implications of the construction and maintenance afterward. The terms of responsibility and evaluation are to be determined. This would then bring into consideration public health considerations. From there then one needs to attend to the accommodations of workers who are working on a project temporarily when they do not legally “reside” in that area but rather elsewhere versus the housing and other amenities available for those who DO live in the area and will be living in the area beyond the construction period, including insofar as there would need to be any accommodation DURING construction regarding their housing status or other amenities.

Matters pertain to “housing” – including affordability – and that which goes into housing – including energy efficiency – can also address what would go into the construction of the two “towers” of concern. For that matter are the following implications:

– Bids that have been placed concurrent to the process of establishing the legal rights and legal qualifications for constructing. This intersects with the roles of contractor labor versus union labor and the manners in which entities contract between private parties or with the “state” – including state and Federal State. There are a number of areas that have already been addressed that need comprehensive review including alleged confidentiality of public contract bidding; the role of intangible property when it comes to public space use or access; private security versus security functions of the police power of the state as represented through agencies of the state such as the police or state-based law enforcement; how the process identifying the valuation of the locality of concern is financed and upon what basis it is financed to assure that any obligation – whether private or public – undertaken in the process is constitutional and capable of being fulfilled.*1

– The role of the state in providing for housing for all people, including in regards to addressing matters pertaining to people’s intersection through the state regarding safety, health need, or some other form of “economic disability.”*2

– Contexts of public versus private “ownership” – including as it pertains to production of or as energy, and the transmission of such “energy.”*3

Then there are specific areas for addressing the context of “restitution” – including insofar as the restitution involves deprivation for timeframes that have violated an individual’s protections against perpetuities or have “defaulted” on timelines that make one person or party or more than one person or party unavailable to be “returned to where they were at the onset of the contract.” Several matters have already been addressed and need more comprehensive evaluation and conclusion regarding considerations of contract terms; fitness to participate in establishing a contract; and legality of contract obligation or manner of performance – including possible “alternative performance” – of contract.

*1 - Dreamliner and Christmas Stock 2016

*2 - What and who is Stormy Daniels NOT and why did the “payment” go through a “private trust” of an “attorney?”

*3 - Energy efficiency and the “solar panel window” design concept (Christmas Stock of 2016) as well as the electromagnetic security system functioning on self-generated and self-regulated energy transmission (June and then August through September of 2018 with “test” of self during July of 2018) that can also be personalized by virtue of use of personal device/s (October 28-29, 2018) coordinated to work with each other.

Inherent in the “delivery” of the restitution is consideration of “future enjoyment” and what that means relative to consideration of legal “obligations” and their performance. 

Now, because we have not talked about “political concepts” but merely “legal contexts” we may have some deficiencies. Was that NOT the original contexts of the questions posited in October of 2017 when I wrote up the four questions to Justice Anthony Kennedy? Where did THAT go? 

Where is the documentation?

Why was there no autopsy of Justice Scalia’s body?

Who was present onsite that alleged themselves to have the “authority” to confirm he was dead and that his death was the result of certain circumstances that qualified at a level that precluded to need for the Constable or the law enforcement that confirmed finding the body to allow for it to be delivered and a certificate of death to be issued without requesting authorization from the judge to perform the autopsy?

Is the problem that YOU want to avoid ANY “indictment” of the “behavior” of a “judge” or member of the judicial branch here…except for the “jewish lawyer” that laundered money for the hooker?

That is not acceptable. 

We are going to need some resolution on the last.

Why?

What if YOU tried to say he DIED on MY RANCH?

Did I ever see you with one of those ultrasonic listening devices at the edge of MY RANCH – including because you used it to spy on my neighbor who was growing and harvesting narcotics?

What if I had said I would agree to a stakeout adjacent to my land to get rid of the narco but you ABUSED that stakeout to MURDER a Supreme Court Justice?

Are you going to question my “state of mind?”

Are you going to require me to get a “professional opinion” about my “state of mind” that may also involve a “court order” that may alter the context within which I am considered legally qualified to contract?

And if I am concerned that the narco next door is using his drug dealing to traffic weapons…

?

You are going to have to answer these questions.

One way or another.

This is NOT confidential.

Thank you very much.

I am not “dumping” the body in the river.

And neither are you.

That would make a “health hazard” and “contaminate the water” and we could have some form of “health concern” based upon contamination of the water supply.

9:35 am CST

May 3, 2024

Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse

Do NOT do what you said you intended to do with those students who were arrested out of UT by virtue of their association with UT Arlington.

When do we get to “bond fraud?”

By 1:18 pm CST on Feb. 28, 2025 the following is posted public:

So are you going to accuse me or "wire fraud" in using my own email account?

Feb. 23, 2022.

The m is 13...the n is 14...and this has been a consistent "swap" arrangement since at least 2015.

Why?

I am not going to put the information about "Stanford Bank." The wikipedia information is not suitable at this time. BUT, the main argument was that the "pyramid scheme" conviction was going to be "appropriated" by the State of Texas and the Bennet disbarment was capable of "supplanting" the original parties to suit with those identifiable in the Bennett disbarment.

The second part had to do with the relationship between ["marketting" or] "programming" and the impact on people's behavior, including through the use of counterfeits or forgeries that "encode" vulnerability or error into the process to condition people to acclimate themselves to commit crimes. Which crimes? These forgeries can also impact digital processes and attempt to compel people to impersonate others or take on what is not fact. Any consideration beyond the United States at the time did NOT include Ukraine/Russia directly, but did consider gas and oil contracts in Iraq with companies that were involved with supporting medical facilities of social service providers -- including homeless or domestic violence service providers -- that refer persons to such hospitals. These relationships with the gas and oil sector can include persons from the companies of concern on the Board of Directors and/or through projects or other forms of sponsorship of the facility.

Hence the proposed process of the investigations this past summer and why and by whom on what timeline. This is also consistent with the process identified regarding the "Attorney General" and the conference of Attorney Generals from the states at the beginning of 2023 and how that was to be followed up on in September of 2024 after the Secretary of HHS and the persons of concern had formal contact/meeting with the Attorney General.

Do any of these "shell accounts" include investments in or contracts with the Department of Defense? What about educational facilities that have students and/or academic coordination for "research?" That was part of the first consideration with regard to what was supposed to be the written and submitted appeal by the end of that day.

When I learned about the declaration of war the next day that occurred as I understood it at the time when the computers were offline and I was to be typing my appeal I did not follow-through and instead wanted to wait for responses from the Court. What happened in March for April 1? I then decided to wait for another appeal period relative to the considerations of part 1. I did 11 case reviews at the end of July in preparation on two different days -- the first day on voice recorder and the second day using written notes and no voice recorder. My voice recorder was stolen on Aug. 4, 2024. 

If you are mindful, did you read the original transcript? Did you read the representations of Judge Kelsey on the site? So you KNOW that the disparagement and the characterization of her by virtue of the "Amici" would be material to anything that is now being posited as someone else's argument. I did not submit an "Amicus Curae" in 2019 and THAT was among the reasons I requested leave to File for New Trial in September of 2019 via the FEDERAL COURT.

7:01 pm CST

Feb. 27, 2025

"Charity Colleen Crouse, pro se"

Does it make a difference without a "title?"

_____________________________________________

How much of this:

https://www.secactions.com/

Are you trying to get me to pay for now and since June 27, 2024?

What about Sept. 21, 2021?

Where is my outlook email account?

"See Lit. Rel. No. 26255 (Feb. 24, 2025)"

https://www.secactions.com/ponzi-scheme-master-robert-allen-stanford-enjoined-fined-and-penalized-by-sec/

.

Again, where is everything that I have already had stolen?

Starting with my birth certificate and driver's license?

Where are my keys for where I am going to go to my home and SLEEP INSIDE TONIGHT?

Where am I supposed to sleep tonight that you are not going to "charge" me overnight?

Did the people who work at the library record that Feb. 23, 2022 proceeding/effort on MY part and use it to bid out through or with the City? And Austin knew? Did Carillo Ramirez know before she went to that Senate confirmation?

7:07 pm CST

Feb. 27, 2025

"Charity Colleen Crouse"

THIS is exactly what I was accusing them of setting up to do:

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/texas/txndce/3:2009cv00298/184049/3455/

.

I contacted the SEC on Nov. 30, 2024...

Are you serious?