Proclamation for Spring Equinox 2024 - 3.22.2024
​
Greetings:
As of today I am bringing formal hate crimes charges against WalMart. These charges are in conjunction with the prosecution of Goldman Sachs regarding events of December of 2023. The charges of hate crimes are specific to crimes against jewish people, including jewish families via the father. Evidence was provided yesterday that substantiates this claim in connection with an ongoing investigation involving evidence acquired in Spring of 2022.
It is also important that the specific “jewish person” of concern in this matter is also a cabinet member in the Administration. This is not the first time that WalMart specifically has been directly implicated in anti-semitic hate crimes using one member of the family to target the rest of the family. Both cases qualify for what would be identifiable as “Sex Terrorism” under the “Anti-Sex Terrorism Act of 2022” that is being revised this year. They also qualify for other crimes already established in law, including crimes of terrorism connected to:
-
acts of wire fraud (18 U.S. Code § 1343),
-
money laundering (18 U.S. Code § 1956), and
-
threatening the life of a government official and/or member of the family of a government official, including via use of a deadly weapon (18 U.S. Code § 1114).
Other charges are forthcoming. Included in consideration of the charges are a formal request for consideration of the Constitutional issue at hand – right to future enjoyment. Does it matter that as of yet a person is not actually a “father” but is of age and what would otherwise be understood to be social and economic status to provide a significantly beneficial context in which to raise a child? Does it matter at what stage in their own natural biological fertility they are? Or rather, is it to be prioritized to consider that their sexual behavior is intended to benefit others, including via exploitation of digital media that uses their image or representation as “financing” or “credit” for others, including without their informed consent and without addressing via formal and legally enforceable contract terms of compensation? Does this include fraudulently acquired “genetic information,” including as acquired through what would otherwise be considered appropriate “medical treatment,” up to and including via their relationship to what would be legally referenced as an “abortion?”
This is not just about the “right to choose.”
It is about “protection of persons, houses, papers, and effects” and “pursuit of happiness.”
Is that digital account you want to run your WalMart card on your “property?”
Is that “digital account” your “baby’s father?”
Do you have a right to “enjoy” it now or later based upon your projection of it now or in the past without the other person’s consent or even knowledge?
These are CRIMINAL CHARGES with CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES at “stake.”
You are not “homesteading” this “case” and taking a “loan” out on the members of the cabinet for your “private property tax relief.”
9:29 am CST
March 22, 2024
Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse
In three days I will be filing formal charges regarding sending the “children” to “Arkansas.”
Attorney General of Texas, Charity Colleen Crouse
9:29 am CST
March 22, 2024
​
​
​
​
​
​