Regarding Abortion as Miscarriage of Justice 

 

Again it has come to my attention that at a critical time for women in the world another effort to represent as “women’s rights” in the form of “liberalizing” access to abortion has come forth. I can recount how disappointed I was when both Ireland and Poland legalized abortion the same year during a time frame when political repression against women globally was escalating. These trends mirror cycles that are upon us from periods past that not only led to GREATER repression of women, but also led to the demise of empires and nations, including nations that were in processes of self-determination against Empire.

 

As someone who launched her own congressional campaign with a call to consider the role that motherhood played in policy and what our society would be like were that to be the most esteemable value upon which we based our platforms, as a woman that had an “abortion” while she was trying to go to college in a context of others alleging to me that I had to “choose” between my “child” and my “future,” and as someone who literally had her political campaign stolen from her with no indication as to what would justify such a thing and THEN see it years later turn up in the political campaigns of OTHER WOMEN running for political office, I can say honestly that I have “life experience” in these matters. It is not a “constituent concern” for me in the same way as it would be for a woman – or a man – that would not acknowledge publicly and politically their direct relationship with such issues.

 

Political disappearance and abortion – what is the relationship?

 

Perhaps we should first speak about two areas that are of great importance in this regard:

 

1. The role of aborted fetuses in stem cell research and the attendant concerns – often obscured or misrepresented – of the relationship between research and development for alleged medical purposes and weapons development; and 

2. The role of the spirit when it comes to transmission of genetic materials to other persons, including after the death of one who is biologically connected to a person.

 

These matters transcend the church, but they also transcend the psychopathologization of women’s capabilities that would otherwise seek to remand women’s capabilities to some form of “medical diagnostic” that translates nicely in a derivative economy, including one allegedly assuring “freedom” of “market participation” free from “excessive regulation.” It has been my experience – politically and personally – that “abortion” as a women’s right often precedes escalation of domestic disturbances or uprisings that themselves provide fertile grounds for development of security and weapons scenarios, that also see to it that access to means to assure one’s safety and financial stability are compromised.

 

In a time when mass migration between one country and another, or within a country from one area to another, is as commonplace as it is, one must necessarily take concern over speaking of abortion as a right. What has first been done to secure one’s housing, one's income, and one’s capacity to engage in political expression without fear of reprisal? Incarceration is a risk that has unfortunately been allowed to be made as such in more sectors and under more circumstances than it should be, and that also includes the misrepresentation of the relationship between incarceration and “treatment” for alleged “medical illnesses” that target one for behaving in manners that do not comport with the preference of the political majority. Is abortion being used as political leverage in an effort to exercise “behavioral sciences” as a form of social control?

 

I contend it is. I also contend that the market in the genetic materials of aborted fetuses – including what it offers as the genetic materials of the mother and the father – needs to be closely examined and exposed. Are they patenting the genetic materials of aborted fetuses? Are who would otherwise have been the “birth parents” of the child or children involved being compelled to pay “royalties” on someone else’s “patent” of their genetic materials? Are they making “duplicates” of not just the genetic materials, but also revisions of the electronic accounts of the birth parents in order to create “derivative products” available for “copyrighting” and THEN assessing royalty payment TO the “birth parents” in order to pay who was determined to be eligible as the beneficiaries of what would otherwise have been the child’s inheritance? Are women who have had an abortion – including while they are young – being selectively assigned social access or status to control their “breeding options” in order to “engineer” better “biological products” based on the patents and copyrights that have ALREADY been acquired on what was done with the aborted fetus?

 

If I tell you I can hear the people who now are using my dead son’s body would you say that I am “crazy?” “Mentally ill?” If I told you that I heard and SAW them use my dead son’s body to create biological weapons they want to say are a “pandemic” or a “coronavirus” or a particularly “virulent” strain of a coronavirus would you accuse me of treason?

 

Would you support me if I proposed a bill to criminalize trafficking in genetic materials? Or would you say that because you are already a patent or royalty holder of my genetics I need to modify my behavior and accept “liberalizing abortion” as a political right if I intend to continue to politically identify myself as a woman?

 

I would hope that if you actually supported a WOMAN’S RIGHT TO CHOOSE you would understand what she means when she says that first you have to give her appropriate options.

 

I consider the need for abortion to be a national character flaw. Does that mean it is a “pandemic?” Does it mean that I am attempting to enforce a state requirement on someone’s private property?

 

Is a woman’s body her own private property?

 

Is what a woman can do with her body her private property?

 

Is what a woman and a man can do together with their bodies their own private property?

 

These are essential questions at this time. I personally am not accepting the bodies of children who have not even been able to be born as leverage for political – and literal – war. 

 

9:48 am CST

Nov. 14, 2023

President Charity Colleen Crouse

​

Corrections as of 10:12 am CST on Dec. 14, 2023.