* 11:04 am CST on Feb. 8, 2024
On Nov. 27, 2018 I contacted the Nuclear Regulatory Commission about information I had on a terrorist attack in Egypt. I have identified this effort in another post publicly made on another blog before this time. At the time of that attack, there were contract tenders pending in Iraq for “security” for five locations that correlated with another “organization” that was tendering for “legal services” in the same five cities. It happened that the “security” company identified its five-city plan as a “SURGE strategy.”
The legal services organization also identified itself as providing “legal services” in Gaza.
This:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYA1thaNW7c
is directly connected to that.
The “crowd” you see was about a Palestinian rights protest that happened in front of City Hall in Dallas the day before, but the specific picture is of a group of American jews protesting and using the slogan “Not In Our Name” as their rallying cry. In the early 2000s, I was on the Board of Directors of an organization of American Jews critical of Israel’s Occupation of Palestinian Lands called “Not In My Name.” It was founded by a person in Chicago who went to a protest with a sign that said “Not In My Name.” The newspaper at which I was Managing Editor covered his protest. I later became a member and then still later became a member of the Board of Directors.
Now, that “political capital” was VERY IMPORTANT on May 1, 2022 – the three-year anniversary of a $800,000,000 General Obligation bond issued by Citigroup for the City of Chicago. Its payouts are on May 1 and November 1 of each year for its duration.
They did not want the “jew” on that “credit” though. It was supposed to FIRST go through Houston to be delivered to Dallas later…
On April 4, 2023 it was “delivered” for the first time.
I say first, because then there was the murdered rabbi and this:
He did not “die in his sleep” and EVERYONE who is ANYONE in Dallas knows it.
Are there 400 “American jews” in jail right now in “Washington, DC” after a protest?
[So I cannot use the first link about that protest because the judge that libeled me has the same family name as the person who they end the tranche with – just what this is about.]
[Do I need to put this:
https://prospectus.bondtraderpro.com/$VANBUR.PDF
[1:37 pm CST on April 5, 2024]
Instead? Are you going to say anything?
Issue it now.
1:03 pm CST
Nov. 2, 2023
President Charity Colleen Crouse]
And you wanted to say WHAT ABOUT WHAT?
No.
Do you remember what the Freedom Riders said about “bail bonds?”
You know the worst mistake of the Kennedy Administration?
Those 17-day Treasury notes that he let get set up on kicking back to the states and their “police powers” the “glory” of forestalling “riots” by “escorting” the Freedom Riders to jail instead of sending federal marshals to DO THEIR JOB.
I am not allowing for such a bond move to be made.
No. No 42-day notes to “manage your cash” either.
You should [DAGGER] have let this happen.
The argument below was first composed after NUMEROUS videos were made to the same effect. Around the time of the “Capitol Riot” a number of things had already occurred that until this time NO ONE MENTIONS:
-
Donald Trump signed into law a number of pieces of legislation on Jan. 5, 2021. What were they and when were they put on his desk?
-
The President of the United States had NOT signed off on the census results as he was required to be law before the end of Dec. 31, 2020 and was already informed of in Trump v. New York (which I contend is one of the most miserable acts of alleged “Constitutional law” conducted by the alleged “Supreme Court of the United States” and [DAGGER] have led to impeachment proceedings in and of itself).
-
Donald Trump issued an Executive Order on Jan. 5, 2021 that was taken offline before the end of his “term” and has not reappeared, comparable to a number of other instances wherein “Executive Orders” by Donald Trump showed up on the White House site and were NOT remarked on and then later “disappeared.”
-
The U.S. Congress has proposed an “appropriation” for a “remote operations center” for the Department of Homeland Security to “monitor” activities at the U.S. Capitol building.
Why until this time has no one said anything about this?
“Those people” in not should not be in jail.
They need federal marshals to escort them immediately.
See below:
[11:16 am CST on Feb. 8, 2024 - The "DAGGERS" are USMC Stillettos. Use as necessary. Do not threaten the Co-President again. Bonded by 4 pm CST on Feb. 1, 2024; Paid in full on two-year FRN Treasury Note on Jan. 31, 2024.
Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse
Feb. 8, 2024]
https://charitycolleencrouse.wixsite.com/order-of-removal/5th-project.
1:38 pm CST
April 5, 2024
_____________________________________________________________
Aug. 2, 2023
9:09 am CST
Austro-Hungarian Symphony No. 43.
By whom?
__________________________________________
Article I, Section 3:
The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.
Article II, Section 1:
…Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.
Article IV, Section 4:
…The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
Article V:
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.
…
Article the first... After the first enumeration required by the first article of the Constitution, there shall be one Representative for every thirty thousand, until the number shall amount to one hundred, after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall be not less than one hundred Representatives, nor less than one Representative for every forty thousand persons, until the number of Representatives shall amount to two hundred; after which the proportion shall be so regulated by Congress, that there shall not be less than two hundred Representatives, nor more than one Representative for every fifty thousand persons.
…
Amendment XXIII:
Section 1.
The District constituting the seat of Government of the United States shall appoint in such manner as the Congress may direct:
A number of electors of President and Vice President equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives in Congress to which the District would be entitled if it were a State, but in no event more than the least populous State; they shall be in addition to those appointed by the States, but they shall be considered, for the purposes of the election of President and Vice President, to be electors appointed by a State; and they shall meet in the District and perform such duties as provided by the twelfth article of amendment.
Section 2.
The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
Amendment XX:
Section 3.
If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
…
Section 1.
The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.
…
Amendment XII:
Passed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804.
Note: A portion of Article II, section 1 of the Constitution was superseded by the 12th amendment. The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; -- the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. [And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. --]* The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. *Superseded by section 3 of the 20th amendment.
…
Amendment XXIV:
…Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Article I, Section 3:
…The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.
The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the Absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States.
Article I, Section 5:
…Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.
__________________________________________________
This is not the same argument I presented before my voice recording was stolen.
It is consistent with what I have been stating since soon after the allegations against the persons present outside of the Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021 entered the building and took the floor.
I contend that President Donald Trump did not have the authority to commit any actions on Jan. 6, 2021 relative to the determinations of the results of the Electoral College votes determining who would be the next President of the United States. I contend that day that the President of the United States Senate, Mike Pence, was the ONLY person authorized to confirm or discount the Electoral College votes. It then fell on the members of the United States Senate to respond in the event that the President of the United States Senate demonstrated his incapacity – or unwillingness – to fulfill his duties; in the event that the members of the United States Senate were incapacitated – or unwilling – to fulfill their duties, it then fell on the members of the United States House of Representatives.
Vice-President Mike Pence, acting in his capacity as the President of the United States Senate, presented himself as such before the assembled joint members of the United States Senate and United States House of Representatives. At the time, he stated on the record he did not have the authority to challenge the determinations of the Electoral College. I contend that at that time, he abdicated his role as President of the United States Senate and created a Constitutional void. President of the United States Senate Mike Pence was the ONLY person at that time that was authorized to challenge the Electoral College votes and to invoke the appropriate Constitutional process in order to address whatever concerns with the count were justified. When he created that void, it was on members of the United States Senate to respond; by virtue of the Rules of Order in consideration of the Constitutional processes available for application as herein outlined, members of the United States Senate would then have been authorized to take action insofar as the President of the United States Senate demonstrated his incapacity – or unwillingness - to fulfill his Constitutional duties. Insofar as the members of the United States Senate demonstrated their incapacity – or unwillingness – to perform their Constitutional duties, it then fell on members of the United States House of Representatives to fulfill their Constitutional duties.
Following the President of the United States Senate’s abdication of his authority, neither members of the United States Senate nor members of the United States House of Representatives attended to the matter at hand and exercised their authority – and duty – to uphold the Constitution. All authority derives from the People. At that time, except for those who were employed in government service, the “People” present that day were at the time of the abdication outside the doors of the Capitol building. They were present to fill the void that had been created by either the incapacity – or the unwillingness – of the one President of the United States Senate, the 100 members of the United States Senate, and the 425 members of the United States House of Representatives to uphold the Constitution.
The characterization of the assembled Americans that exercised their Constitutional authority – and duty – to assure that an act of abdication of the authority of the Constitution was not allowed to prevail and expose the nation to the risks and threats of such a Constitutional void is not only inaccurate, but I contend libelous and compels a closer examination of the motives of all 525 allegedly “elected” members of the United States Senate and United States House of Representatives to uphold the Constitution, including with an understanding that they had just taken an oath to uphold their office prior to assembling in the joint session that day. On that day, the President of the United States does not have the authority to order the President of the United States Senate to influence or interfere with the confirmation of the Electoral College votes. Neither does any member of the United States Senate or the United States House of Representatives. The assembled Americans outside of the Capitol building did not enter until after the President of the United States Senate failed to uphold his Constitutional duties AND the members of the United States Senate and United States House of Representatives failed to uphold theirs. Additionally, after the entry of the Americans assembled outside the doors of the Capitol building, the alleged members of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives fled the Capitol grounds. The Americans assembled at the Capitol that day re-established Constitutional authority when they took the floor.
After entering and establishing the authority of the People to prevent against a fulfillment of an abdication of the authority of the Constitution, the actions of the assembled compel another consideration. However, it was not the “crime” of those who reclaimed the authority that had been abdicated once the President of the United States Senate, the alleged members of the United States Senate, and the alleged members of the United States House of Representatives abdicated it that occurred that day.
At this time, and in consideration of not only actions taken by those alleging themselves to have been Constitutionally “elected” to the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives by Jan. 3, 2021, I reconsider my original contention that it behooved the assembled who entered the building to maintain consistent physical presence overnight and for 24 hours.
9:46 am CST
Aug. 2, 2023
“Charity Colleen Crouse”
9:54 pm CST
Aug. 2, 2023
?
What was the number on the arrest report?
____________________________________
Per U.S. v. White and Chiles, there is already precedent for understanding that insofar as an alleged “government” is acting unconstitutionally, it is on the People to uphold the constitution, even if in so doing they act in manners that are identified as “unlawful” by virtue of the Unconstitutional state actors passing laws or enforcing laws in manners that violate the Constitution.
The actions that have been taken since the events of Jan. 6, 2021 – including the refusal to address events that occurred on Jan. 5, 2021 and that occurred in connection with actions taken by the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate prior to the morning of Jan. 6, 2021 – compel a consideration of the precedent established in U.S. v. White and Chiles at this time, and in consideration of the manner of the proceedings until this time.
9:59 am CST
Aug. 2, 2023
Citizen Charity Colleen Crouse
______________________________________________
1:11 pm CST in two minutes...
Nov. 2, 2023
President Charity Colleen Crouse
12:57 pm CST
Nov. 2, 2023
President Charity Colleen Crouse