Five Years and One Year Later

Notes for Attorney General Haddad and January Conference - 12.28.202[3]

(for reference: https://search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=8493d06f-d807-43fc-9666-3a2dfb092bb9&coa=cossup&DT=OTHER&MediaID=8b60049b-799e-490b-b5ea-365c46f0c33b)

Dates/Timeframes:

1. February 2018 - First Draft of Strategy

2. September/October of 2018 - Refinement of Strategy

3. December of 2018 - Contacts Attorney General from U.S. States (at least 45 of 50)

​
 

1. Evaluate how state laws were used/abused in Texas specifically regarding “marketplace mandate” of Affordable Care Act – was there a pre-existing nexus incorporated into ACA framework or did ACA provide template/framework for using/abusing state laws to “create” racket?

2. Relative to Trump announcement regarding quarterly earnings statements being reduced to semi-annual/annual reporting = how did this impact tracking of acts of trafficking?

   1. How was “opiate epidemic” (including as referenced in H. Con. Res. 71 of 2017 and addressed in 2017 petition to SCOTUS) impacted by/relevant via ACA? Understood at that time there was a “second stage” of opiate epidemic cases.

3. Dec. 14, 2018 “denied/dismissed/denied” by Texas Supreme Court relative (page 1) to Writ of Quo Warranto (18-0600) especially information/charges regarding “relational databases” and “immigration” relative to social and human services in light of charges from Wr-87,139-01 from June/July of 2017 and State of Texas submission of case to SCOTUS on Dec. 14, 2018 re: ACA and “$0” tax penalty.

​

Of note: “Medicare for All” campaign beginning with swearing in of 2019 freshman Congress AND new round of announcements regarding state cases regarding opiate epidemic = how many states engaged cases in 2019 PRIOR to announcement of COVID-19? This would be the third/fourth “stage” of “opiate epidemic” cases.

• Ohio Attorney General and delay of award/distribution of payment at end of 2019 summer = why?

• Which state’s Attorneys General filed charges against ACA? For what? When? Why?

• In what manners do cases filed by Attorneys General against ACA by Attorneys General in third/fourth stages of “opiate epidemic” and Anti-Boycott/Divest/Sanction (page 2) bills in various states correlate?

​

1. Primary approach is that the Affordable Care Act is a “master contract” to commit to a criminal conspiracy with various states “subcontracting” with federal government.

2. Request made in July of 2017 for formal criminal charges regarding consideration of “Kingpen Statute” pertaining to role of President in conspiracy; original defendants were identified as Donald Trump and Barack Obama.

3. After March of 2020, named defendants include the following:

   1. President Donald Trump

   2. Vice-President Mike Pence

   3. President Barack Obama

   4. Vice-President Joseph Biden

4. After January of 2021, named defendants include the following:

   1. President Joseph Biden

   2. President Donald Trump

   3. President Barack Obama

   4. Vice-President Kamala Harris

   5. Vice- President Mike Pence (page 3)

   6. Vice-President Joseph Biden

5. By virtue of Executive Orders, including as implemented by President Barack Obama, defining the role of the Vice-President in a national declaration of emergency connected to a pandemic outbreak, I contend that the Vice-President becomes principal and eligible for Kingpen consideration as pertains to the announcement of and actions taken as regards “Coronavirus/COVID-19.”

6. Other named respondents were specifically identified in petitions of Oct. 20, 2017 (filed on Oct. 23, 2017) and Dec. 7, 2018; specific named respondents in order were indicative and evidentiary of the allegations regarding the “pattern of racketeering” and the means by which it was effected.

7. In RICO, a pattern muse be demonstrated twice in ten years. Per the process outlined in H. Con. Res. 71, there is a specific 10-year “index” for identifying the “racketeering.” Thus far, the “full racket” as charged has been (page 4) “beared out” more than twice and “resets” for another ten years upon each completion of cycle; as such “statute of limitations” considerations are impacted accordingly.

8. “Statute of limitations” also includes consideration of outlined strategy, including specific and intentional manipulation of state constitution provisions as well as federal, including “perpetuities” and Fourteenth Amendment violations put on individuals in manners that violate Thirteenth Amendment, including as effectuated through violation of the Fourth Amendment. As of July 3, 2023, I contend COVID-19 has ALSO potentially impacted considerations of the Fifth Amendment including as pertains to unconstitutional “law” regarding “confidentiality” or “exceptions” to mandated disclosure.

9. In RICO, a “pattern of racketeering activity” and “racketeering” can be proven by virtue of use of same “vehicle” for the commission of the crimes. Thus far I have (page 5) focused on myself as “pro se” per this premise, including as “pro se” in roles of representation as other than as “legal counsel.”

10. Also of consideration is the specific elements of the Texas Organized Crimes Act and what it includes specific to federal law and what it does not.

11. Additional consideration pertains to “conspiracy as crime” and demonstrations of “cognizance” versus “continued repudiation” in identifying accomplices, accessories, or principals.

12. Writ of Exception (Bill) in original case has been met AT LEAST TWICE. Most recently, charges specific to concurrent events of Dec. 1, 2023; Dec. 4, 2023; and Dec. 5, 2023 onward support original contentions regardless of theft of evidence as well as in light of theft of evidence (different charges) regarding earlier crimes. 

1. Specific consideration to “perpetuities” and correlation with “judgment liens” under property law that include 20-year terms with option to (page 6) renew claim for an additional 20 years = The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (including the passed version and previous version not passed) and “public record” on the law and its applications – including processes for proposal and passage – that acknowledges “patterns” involving prosecution and “collateral” consideration; what happened 22 years earlier? What from there happened 21 years later? What from there happened 20 years later? 

[Other points of note:

• EEOC and General Motors - 1983

• Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993

  • Why

    • 1.05

    • 1.06

    • 25 years later…

•  2008 “Banking Crisis” and 90th Anniversary…relative to S&L Crisis per Iran-Contra and military pension “reform”

• Iran hostage crisis with Latin American (page 7) interdiction bills]

[BRACKETS] include premises/charges not identified in original Writ/Bill of Exception but have become pertinent in “discovery” process since original filing. They would NOT constitute “same charges” for the purposes of addressing efforts to thwart/quash appeal or to request reconsideration under original charges.

1. On the other hand” “twice in 10 years” has been revealed to include:

• March 23.24, 2010 as well as 

• March 27, 2017

1.  Thus far no CHARGES regarding March 23/24. 2010 have been filed BUT there was a request for reconsideration of “insurance billings” and “Medicare fraud” that included “fraud” involving “Social Security Disability Insurance” paid out in 2011. That would then potentially – and I contend does – concern specific events connected to 2008 election – Presidential as well as Congressional – and that (page 8) evidence was provided in 2020 election in Texas specific to federal elections that I contend may be evidentiary of crimes that occurred in Illinois.

• See report from Feb. 14, 2017 for reference and as evidence in consideration of allegations.

1. The 2010 “case” (as of yet unfiled) does NOT preclude full consideration and legitimacy of case regarding 2017 onward.

• One major question, however, is WHAT was the “vehicle” in 2017 versus 2010?

• Is this potentially consistent as regards others?

Note: As of now, I have not pursued this as a “civil rights” claim for specific reasons. This is NOT a tort; this is NOT a trade court case; this IS a criminal case; this IS a Constitutional case.  

12:54 pm CST

12/28/2023

Signed: Charity [Colleen “Lovejoy”] Crouse

​

_______________________________________________________

​

Child Porn.

​

​

​

2:06 pm CST

May 28, 2024

Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse

​

​

​