Executive Proclamation Regarding Intent to Engage Nuclear Actions Specific to Individual Safety
- charitycolleencrouse
- Oct 16, 2023
- 3 min read
Insofar as the financial sector allows for economic activities that obligate individual persons to performances of their capacities to execute transactions that provide security for the American people and others;
Insofar as the financial sector allows for processes that include pooling, consolidation, securitization, swapping, central counterparty activities, and other finance practices that engage individual human capital in manners about which they are unaware of at the onset or that have been engaged on their behalf by other actors;
Then the People have a right to protect themselves.
Too much has been engaged in the last several decades at misrepresenting crimes – including crimes at the level of the State – as risk and compelling or coercing otherwise law-abiding people into complicity.
Addressing financial crimes is a major priority but so too is it a priority to protect productive and
capable people from illegal activities engaged by those who believe they can use their role in the finance system to “out risk” prosecution for crime.
The term “nuking” to describe a transaction that has defaulted and hence requires a liquidation of assets or a lien to be applied to cover the default has been misabused with a frequency that is itself a national security issue. It has also been misabused in manners that have resulted in fraudulent representations of a person’s medical need. Rather than addressing the implications of how the digital economy violates the Fourth Amendment by applying technological means to put people into positions where they are violated in their person and their property under the auspices of being obligated to perform someone else’s financial obligation, the financial sector has contrived through the insurance sector to label people as medically – including mentally – ill so as to compel them to perform the obligations of others and defraud them of their property and prosperity. The people have a right to protect themselves, including in name and reputation.
The following is provided now in order to give a process for persons to identify their understanding of a threat at being “nuked” and what they are entitled under the law to do about it.
When considering the compulsion or coercion to engage a performance of an alleged “payment” event or other “financial obligation” attend to the following considerations:
What are the performance requirements?
Are they illegal?
Are they amoral or do they “shock the conscience?”
Do they involve another person?
Are you willing to perform them?
Perform a double-check.
Do you understand other people may be impacted if you do not perform?
How do you understand they will be impacted?
Are you still unwilling to perform?
Following the ninth area, please consider the following in connection with your response:
What is the adversary?
Is it an insider threat?
What are its capabilities?
What capabilities of yours are they aiming for?
Can you recover from a loss of your capabilities?
Can you acquire their capabilities?
What ratio of recovery/acquisition are you aiming for?
What do you expect to be the consequences for one who threatens to nuke you and intends to deliver on the threat?
Are you willing to accept such consequences yourself in the event that you do not succeed?
Are you willing to pre-emptively nuke another to prevent their nuclear option from being delivered?
As President of the United States, I contend the above is necessary in order to definitively identify your understanding of the threat. The balance of power in the scenario – including insofar as you understand and express as your state of mind that you understand the threat to be so significant – is imperative to providing yourself with protection. You have the right to assume your own power if and as necessary. You have the right to apply all protections of the Constitution as necessary. This applies to everyone, regardless of race, sex, gender, age, class or even nationality.
Provided by 9:04 pm CST
Oct. 15, 2023
President Charity Colleen Crouse
Put into electronic format by 10:19 am CST on Oct. 16, 2023.
10:34 am CST
Oct. 16, 2023
Posted
10:44 am CST
Oct. 16, 2024
Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse
How many days?
How many days was Justice Clarence Thomas' confirmation proceeding?
18-103, Dec. 4, 2017.
Correct?
For the record, I will need Chief Justice Clarence Thomas onsite at the Capitol Grounds for tomorrow's swearing in ceremony.
Please see to it that anyone who has a Constitutional qualm with their swearing in follows the appropriately outlined procedure.
11:12 am CST
Dec. 4, 2023
President Charity Colleen Lovejoy Crouse