Post 127: Concerning Civil Rights and Constitutional Protections - 6.6.2025

Concerning Civil Rights and Constitutional Protections - 6.6.2025

Good morning:

It has been recently identified that this computer station at a local municipal library is being remotely accessed by persons representing other countries and/or the United Nations. This has not been confirmed; I have not been provided with any legal documentation; and I did not agree to this in any manner. I have held forth for years that I am comporting myself Constitutionally, including during a time wherein unconstitutional actors are impostering the government of the State of Texas (if not also New York, California, Illinois and Georgia as well as Washington, DC) and the United States. I have been intentionally denied any legal evidence submissions process and have repeatedly had evidence stolen and used in crimes for over nine years actively with NO support or legally-required communication regarding my actual efforts before the Judiciary. This also includes reports to numerous Consulate/Embassies of foreign nations, as well as international law enforcement and regulatory bodies recognized, including by treaty, by the United States government. It should also include a specific “declaration” I wrote regarding NATO assistance to the United States from 2021.  

I consider this to be justifiable for “voiding” any legal claim. This is not comparable to any “grand jury” process – including a requirement to ascertain via a formal process whether or not someone subjected to a grand jury proceeding would be willing to cooperate after formal and legally-required communication – and any effort to remand it to any “FISA” proceeding I contend is treasonous. I have held this forth for more than seven years, including formally and publicly.

At this time is important to know that per the terms outlined in Texas v. White & Chiles, the burden of proof is on YOU and those with whom you are conspiring. Recall that among my stolen “work” and evidence is several hours of legal review of the charge of “conspiracy” as a crime and the prosecution of “conspiracy” – including “conspiracy” that includes “government officials” in manners for which the “privileges and protections of immunity” are not available. I contend this qualifies. You will need to be held accountable for every Constitutional violation – including criminal violation – meted out in the course of your specific role in this conspiracy, regardless of at what point you joined it. If you have held forth that you are an “official representative” of any government, then the State itself is to be held accountable for allowing you to exercise this “individual” effort. 

Under military law, there is a 72-hour requirement to “show your flag.” You have refused to do this the entire time. It is now 10:41 am CST on June 6, 2025 – by June 9, 2025 you must declare under what “flag” you personally perform these duties or I understand you have committed yourself to an act of war masquerading as a “legal proceeding” – including without any formal documentation of your legal authority as well as without a formal declaration of war, including what “charges” you intend to “prosecute” and what are your demands. You have refused to engage any efforts at negotiation or de-escalation during this time frame. I understand this specific round commenced by May 15, 2025 but is a part of enjoining to a specific effort intentionally and belligerently engaged beginning with the start of calendar year 2025. 

I am charging each of you for your role in what has now been a more than two year process of undermining the Administration of Charity Colleen Crouse and Samuel Mitrani, including by specifically targeting members of the cabinet for race-based and other reasons that constitute “crimes” – including “hate crimes” and other criminal charges. Just importantly are the following two charges, specific to the “alleged” justification for a multi-national effort to attempt something that is so “cruel and unusual” as well as “shocking” in its sheer inhumanity:

1. You have failed to acknowledge that dissent by citizens and legal residents of a country is not to be allowed to be used as “human shielding” for those held forth as “criminal culprits” operating in what is masquerading itself as a “government” that is committing state crimes or crimes of opportunity by individuals holding themselves forth as members of government, including for opportunistic personal “enrichment” purposes; and 

2. These crimes include libel and a denial of political, social and economic capital to which a nation “would otherwise have had” access in order to restore, “alter or reform,” or rebuild its own government in the course of an internal process, including one that otherwise constitutionally engaged with foreign allies, including at a “peer level,” in pursuit of political rights to assembly and processes of government – including of their own making – suitable for administration and other tasks.

Trying to justify any form of proceeding at “this level” or “in this manner” have to take into consideration the SAME contexts that were evaluated during the Reparations Conventions in Europe following World War I – what do you intend to allow for in the “vanquished” country of concern that allows for them to BOTH be able to meet the “demands” of the “victors” in regards to what they hold forth as reparations AND also be able to support itself in order to be able to have the productive capacity to provide it without it being subject to conditions so unbearable that is is not able to do so. Intentionally setting up “obligations” that YOU KNOW they are not going to be able to meet is a “bad faith” arrangement and can be used against you to attempt to charge other crimes, up to and including if necessary through prosecution of war. 

This is not and has not EVER been a “clandestine” effort. This is not and has not EVER been “subversive” of the Constitution of the United States, even while criticizing violations of the Constitution masquerading as “law” – including on a state level. This is not and has not been racially exclusive or intentionally racially selective. On the contrary, one must accept that the “material conditions” of the United States HAVE BEEN ABLE to exist in such a manner that qualified persons can actually bring a great deal of practical expertise and diversity to what “would otherwise be” a Constitutional, successful and just government – even I dare say a socialist government. 

There is NOTHING unconstitutional about “socialism” as a form of political praxis. It does NOT “violate the American way.” As I have declared since the beginning of 2023 PUBLICLY there is NOT even anything unconstitutional about a “communist” government that operates in accordance with specific standards and accomplishes it objectives under specific material conditions. If one says they do not agree to the Constitution as it is, they have a right to “alter or reform” it beginning with application of their Article 1 rights. That does NOT have to mean via infiltration or subversion of an “election process” for local, state or federal government. It does NOT have to involve “secret service” along with “sabotage” to existing government accomplished through crime, including forgery and counterfeiting. It DOES require “work” – substantial work – in order to assure accountability. I contend I have done my work and that in order to participate in what I declared my intent to do I had to hold myself accountable for the first year without any consideration of other “cabinet members” possible political capital contributions until such time as we could meet in person, assure consent and cooperation around political objectives, and create and maintain administrative processes of democratic and accountable – including time accountable – inclusion of others. I provided my proposed budget and “executive communications” accordingly, inclusive of understanding that there were acts of “subversion” at work during that first year by both alleged “government actors” and as-of-yet undeclared “non-government actors.” 

The second year was committed to cost accounting and budgeting outlays via the originally proposed budget, using a “macro/micro-economic strategy” with the primary objective of “ending homelessness in two years” and developing domestic political infrastructure and other works accordingly. There was no demand for relinquishing any “private property” or “privacy” rights but there WERE demands that accountability for holding out and attempting to operate on premises that PEOPLE can be someone else’s “private property” – even for a temporary period of time – allowed to promulgate without being held accountable to the Constitutional implications, including the 14th and 13th Amendment implications. This includes our “immigration” policy BUT it DOES NOT DENY that citizenship is a requirement under our Constitutional system at this time for certain rights and yet does not deny that the Constitution covers anyone through certain manners engaged in or with the United States in political processes. I have spent hours developing policy and engaged in legal reviews – including of already determined cases and cases as of yet unpublished – in order to back this up, including through critique of existing legislation and proposals of new legislation.

That will then allow for an understanding that the charges as now presented specifically refer to this public announcement with was “supposed to be” a communication with certain cabinet members about problems in the current time period and administration aims to address them:

https://charitycolleencrouse.wixsite.com/head/green-3

.

As you notice it was published publicly on Sept. 7, 2023 after what “was supposed to be” a period of direct discussion and review by the attendant members of the cabinet for implementation before the date of publication. Why was I not able to contact them? Literally – for years I have not been able to make email or when I have access phone contact with anyone I used to know – including anyone who would be a cabinet member. As such I had to take the actions I did accordingly. 

Please notice this part:

“This is an urgent problem. All other efforts thus far to address “housing needs” for the poor or homeless have not adequately addressed how CRIME makes people homeless – including institutional crime. That also includes race- and religious-based hate crimes.”

There was another public notice that at this time is not appearing on the official site. This has happened before. The above was predicated upon an analysis and review of a public comment period regarding consideration of proposed changes to the Community Reinvestment Act and the attendant necessary preparation to meet the identified deadlines for a legislative reconsideration of it entitled “Preliminary Report on Community Reinvestment Act Review 8.4.2023.” This includes the following:

“Included in that was that the aspect of ‘credit’ is not exclusive to what credit one has when she or he comes into the credit arrangement, but how he or she ‘builds credit’ in manners that benefit them personally as well as benefit whoever it was with whom she or he had the credit arrangement. I also contend that members of the banking and finance sector willfully and knowingly engaged ‘civilians’ in loan or credit arrangement [as precedent to the 2007 Banking Crisis] based on the character of their credit at the time – knowing the potential for accrual that was present for that person at the time – with the intent of engaging fraud and deceit in their intentions to recharacterize their credit and then claim it for use and availability in manners that were not previously disclosed. People may have agreed to use their credit for one context to which they [were] officially, however, others wanted that credit for something for which they knew the person would not agree, so they engaged them in the credit arrangement under one pretense and then used fraud and deceit to default THAT credit arrangement and then use the credit for another arrangement for which the person did not agree.”

Now consider this from what is still available online at the above link:

“If there is hypothecation ongoing and people’s actual lives are permitted to be denied to them because their ‘stock’ is being bid out through multiple people – including one or a number of others whose ‘stories’ on the street suit someone else’[s] risk leveraging – then this is ALSO a CRIME.”

I contend this is what has been occurring with the libel that has been committed against me and unfortunately EVERY member of the cabinet in one manner or another EVEN BEFORE I ANNOUNCED THE ORIGINAL CABINET MEMBERS.

This began in December of 2022, after Dec. 1, 2022 through Dec. 4, 2022 – when I was subject to “electrocution” involving “informing” me that I had been “killed off” as a biological woman and a jew and henceforward the only “identity” I would be permitted to have was as a “Irish-American transman.” This was every morning, beginning on Dec. 1, 2022 and I said ALOUD AT THE TIME while I was sitting in the lobby of a McDonald’s – one of which I have been going to every morning aside from a a few days and periods in whichI am banned at the primary one – that I did NOT agree to be “transgender,” I did NOT agree to being “killed off” as a “jew,” and I did NOT agree to the racist and representations that were being put on me for what I understand was my REFUSAL to succumb to extortion to cooperate with CRIME. Unfortunately, after the three-day verbal warning consistently for those three days and then on the fourth day, I heard there was also intended “further disparagement” of certain persons I USED to know and with whom I had not been able to communicate for some time. In one manner, that one person had already been “enjoined” with this with me beginning in October of 2021 was a consideration for the manner in which I decided to attempt to carry out the process. That “he” was a “jew” and that the “killing off” of me as a “jew” was alleged to be at his behest and for his benefit was vitiated, I contended, by evidence that this was a CONSPIRACY engaged without consent from EITHER of us in an effort to not only extort us, but to be party to a further conspiracy using us as objects, specifically in consideration of events that occurred in mid-November that were identified later as “OMNICRON” that were libelous and life threatening. 

I contend “OMNICRON” was not a “virulent strain of COVID-19.” I contend it was a eugenicist conspiracy to keep people who would be socially and politically identifiable as “jews” from being able to “claim their own genes” as their “property” because OTHERS intended to “claim” their “genetics” as THEIR property and ceremonialize attempts to pit us against each other to accomplish the “genetic stripping” they intended to “divest” to others as THEIR “property.” The psychological techniques were accompanied by technological – including electronic – processes about which I have been attempting to report and prosecute, as well as legislate, for years before “OMNICRON” was announced. The same “corporate culprits” come up directly and others come up indirectly in the timeframes wherein the “divestments” are supposed to occur. In the process, government factors and intercession through agencies and the other “resources” depending upon my access to material resources otherwise are supposed to be used as “confirmation” that I cooperated with varying consequences depending upon my compelled compliance. This is while being denied ANY “due process” – including to defend myself from formal charges in court where I can “confront my accuser.” There is NO JUST CAUSE HERE – IT IS A CONSPIRACY THAT USES THE GOVERNMENT TO ACCOMPLISH ITS AIMS. I contend it is primarily to disparage and disgrace the American Government and “American people” who WOULD NOT COOPERATE with these crimes and uses race- and ethnic-, as well as sexuality-based processes to attempt to accomplish its aims.

As one can see from consideration of something like the Community Reinvestment Act, this would “otherwise” have possibly been able to be considered “cultural” or “social” capital. Under a socialist government that respected the “civil rights” of persons with regard to their respective identities concerning race, gender, sexuality and culture, it would be “social and political capital” for and by the people in relationship to the organs of the state. It COULD be. It SHOULD be. It was at the time. It should NOT be “organ harvested” to corrupt conspirators using stereotyped rituals of persecution to deny a person the acknowledgement of their contributions. It is not a “Leninist strategy.” It intentionally misrepresented the “state” it was attempting to “seize” without even providing an appropriate “strategy” based upon the actual material conditions of the “state” of concern to attempt the seizure! All continuous defamation and disinformation does is a) cover up the crimes and their costs, and b) refuse to acknowledge WHAT IS IT WITH WHICH THE STATE IS BEING REPLACED!

It is not “work” because there are no “exchange of labor for wages” involved and there is no contract with any entity, including the state, to which to be held to account. It has not yet “converted” into labor from its capital and capital-potential stage. It also has not been able to be allowed to be acknowledged as “national capital” or “state capital” by virtue of the disparagement of the individual contributions or the collective contributions of groups, including what would otherwise qualify as “race” or “gender equity” groups. It is not even leverageable as “debt.” Because there is no cost accounting there is no “value” on the “costs” of the “crimes as crimes.” It can only merely be used as “counterfeit credit” on an illegal market for the exploitation of the persons of concern. For what reason? To what end?

Each member of the cabinet I knew personally for some time except for two. Those I knew identified themselves – including in connection with actual “work” qualifications that I contend they demonstrated to me personally in some manner which would be considered “social capital” – that made them representative of the “people” I understand my country to be and what we need as our representation. NO ONE ELSE was allowed to “try on” their identity and create a forgery or a counterfeit of it and claim that as “private property” for themselves, including through derivation into a “product line.” No one was allowed to malign them and then say the were eligible to be considered SOMEONE ELSE’S IDENTITY while they were denied – including if need be the RIGHT TO CONFRONT ME IN THE EVENT THAT THEY BELIEVED I WAS PARTY TO THEIR EXPLOITATION. I did NOT accuse them personally at the time BUT I DID ACCUSE THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AS IT WAS HELD OUT AS BEING THE GOVERNMENT OF MY PEOPLE AND MY COUNTRY.

Each of them is owed restitution and as necessary reparations for being libeled and defrauded – as well as subject to other crimes – specifically for what should have been their social and political as well as economic capital potential and how they would be able to utilize it in their own country! It has been too long. It has been too many years to justify NOT allowing for THEM PERSONALLY to be provided with a direct means to confront me legally insofar as I would have been party to what they understand to be injustice against them OR to be able to OTHERWISE DO WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN NECESSARY AND ABLE OURSELVES!

We could have ended poverty IN TWO YEARS! By the end of this summer – WE COULD HAVE ENDED POVERTY! Possibly, not just in the United States. Instead, for what is it that you would have commodified our lives? How much are YOU getting paid for your “legal services” right now? What sort of “property rights” are YOU trying to claim as YOUR role? What do YOU ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THE COSTS OF OUR EXPLOITATION? What is your “stake” in further perpetuating it?

If nothing else you had NO RIGHT to libel them via their association with ME in the manner in WHICH I HAVE BEEN LIBELED! 

I need you to “show you flag” before 10:41 am on June 9, 2025. There will be no “payment” and there will be no “divestment” for ANYONE legally, willingly or in any manner that can be allowed to be identified as “eligible” until such time as you identify yourselves and why you allowed yourselves to be party to this. 

I am in Dallas, TX. I have been here for over seven years now. I go to the same library and the same McDonald’s every day specifically and strategically and have for over three and a half years now. I sleep on the “streets” specifically on the area outside of this very library after being kicked out of the park next door after being “genocided” for being a “jew” last June 28, 2024 through July 10, 2024. I was “supposed” to move into my most recent “house” on May 6, 2025. Who are you?

11:45 am CST [12:03 pm CST]

June 6, 2025

Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse aka Senator Charity Colleen Crouse (I-TX)

12:07 pm CST on June 6, 2025