Post 141: Blow Job Report - 8.3.2025

Begin 10:04 am CST on Aug. 3, 2025.

Good morning:

As you know, the subject concerning compelling performances of oral sex under the auspices of obligations – including ones incurred upon a person while they were a minor – has been ongoing for some time. The first instances of it being repeatedly required under threat of death to which I was personally subjected began in June of 2022 and lasted 60 days. During this time I was threatened with having my teeth knocked out and also threatened with having my leg broken under the auspices it would compel me to visit a hospital and be “re-scheduled” for “double knee replacement surgeries” that were “obligated” shortly before I left my job at the Compliance Unit of the Department of Public Health in San Francisco in March of 2014. The implication was that I either agree to have the surgeries – understood to take a total of two years with recovery – or to “die of COVID” at the hospital  

I did not understand that after I saw the x-rays in 2014 I actually needed “knee replacement surgery” for “rheumatoid arthritis.” I contend now that I was correct and the protracted period to which I was compelled to live on the street has more than proven this. I do, however, understand this to be a part of a long-term extortion scheme that transverses many sectors and was LITERALLY apparent in Department of Defense contract awards that were announced during the summer and then “re-bid” in or around August through October of 2023. I had the actual evidence of this on thumb drives that were since stolen. The actual folders documenting the “outlays” were labelled with the attendant “threats” on the dates in which they began and were sequentially identified in the context of the scheme that was ongoing in Summer of 2022.

As discussed just this morning, I was preparing for an appeal in the summer of 2022. By the end of July I had reviewed eleven cases that were supposed to be ready for an August appeal. On Aug. 3, 2022 through August 4, 2022 someone stole my voice recorder which had my notes from six of the eleven case reviews. The other five were in written notes in a notebook that was at Fort America until June/July of 2024. As I said after the theft and the context of the theft in August of 2022 I understand there were “other charges” and that that appeal period was not the primary period of concern. 

I contend now what I have contended this whole time – including insofar as subsequent efforts have identified “moments” of non-performance of obligation going all the way back to July of 1995 - that NO ONE under ANY circumstances is required to provide “oral sex” as a demonstration of loyalty, acceptance of command, “socialization,” compensation to someone else, or a “ceding” of their own personal autonomy or bodily safety. This is not because of its implication as an act legally identifiable as “sodomy” and is considered outside of anyone’s consensual performance on a legal-aged partner. Even trying to use “blow jobs” as a “nuclear option” is completely contemptible and ANYONE who would try to say it is necessary under “threat of nuclear attack” or some other form of attack connected to a threat of use of nuclear weapons understands that the responsibility for the threat is on the President of the United States within the United States or the Head of State of any other country of concern. ONLY the President has the authority to launch a nuclear attack and any President threatened with a nuclear attack is required to respond. Anyone threatening otherwise is a terrorist. Period. 

If a Department of Defense or ANY OTHER KIND OF CONTRACT intercesses with the Federal Government – including via or in network with state governments – and attempts to require performance of oral sex for performance of obligations that also falls on the President to be accounted for by members of the Congress and the Senate and if and as necessary the Supreme Court. I contend neither the Congress, the Senate, nor the Supreme Court have the authority to “compel” performance of obligations via oral sex, including and especially from a non-consenting partner or a minor. Insofar as the “obligation” was incurred upon one WHILE a minor then the responsibility has to be assumed by the PARENTS or the legal guardians of the children at the time; those parents and legal guardians do NOT have any legal justification for obligating their child to future performance of oral sex as a performance of obligations. 

Last evening there was “alleged” to have been a formal meeting without my foreknowledge or presence that included Co-President Samuel Mitrani. It was held forth that at this meeting international representatives were present that would not be covered as a citizen or a legal resident of the United States. I understand the implications of this process have been held forth as having been part of the subject of the meeting of concern. I have NO proof that this meeting actually included him personally or ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE CABINET and I contend more than enough evidence has already been provided to prove that not only I but other members of the cabinet have been subject to identity theft, threats that legally qualify as terrorism, and acts of libel. Libel can have long-term ramifications, including if it is NOT addressed formally and forestalled and corrected for. 

Anyone who interferes with my ability to contact the Co-President or any other member of the cabinet – or them contact me – is to be held accountable for the implications herein. As for the “blow jobs” this is a matter to be taken up directly and formally by Co-President Samuel Mitrani AND I together. Until such time as I am able to formally communicate directly with him and announce or engage a policy with regard to how to address this then the matter is to be regarded as a threat to life for those on whom it is imposed and they are authorized to take any means necessary or available to protect themselves. Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES are YOU to require or attempt to require anyone to “perform oral sex” on you or on your behalf. There is no “role play” or “proxy” of a matter of such a concern.

Additionally please recall insofar as you were aware at the time, that on my Twitter account in July of 2018 I already addressed the matter when I stated publicly that I was committing myself to and recommending that others engage a “sex strike” and a period of celibacy - as distinct from abstinence – as an act of political protest until such time as certain questions were addressed. I also declared a preclusion on masturbation. I have since had to “reconsider” the preclusion on masturbation if one considers it required as an “act of self-defense” in which I have only participated four times since July of 2018. Three times this has occurred since September of 2021. I contend in this case “masturbation” means allowing – even passively – for one to be stimulated to orgasm, including against one’s will, including insofar as they understand themselves to be electronically attacked, and even if they do not “touch themselves” while this occurs. I have already held forth such “remote stimulations” consist of assault, including sexual assault, and understand the means for their accomplishment not only include crimes of illegal coinage, but other crimes. These means can be used for “electronic assaults” that do not directly target the genitals and may target another area for another kind of “stimulation” or effect. I understand this to be a form of “organ harvesting” and contend it is a serious crime that should be considered a crime of “sex terrorism.”

Please see the following for further questions: https://charitycolleencrouse.wixsite.com/head/post/executive-proclamation-regarding-intent-to-engage-nuclear-actions-specific-to-individual-safety.

For the time being, that is all I will say. I understand that in the last several years I have been considerably more militant about this than others. I also understand, however, that the protracted period of time in which I have been subjected to the material and other conditions I have – including isolation and theft of important communications and work that also form “evidence” as well as demonstration of financial and other consistency LEGITIMATE for considerations of obligation – can become war crimes, including insofar as time factors into fertility and these methods may impact fertility. Forced sterility/sterilization or imposing upon one conditions that prevent biological reproduction have already been determined to be a crime of genocide. These contexts for such crimes need to be evaluated in regard to how these processes not only have a material impact on safety, welfare and sustainability, but also the manners in which they may affect genetics, including as acts of genetic engineering that attempt to compel “behavioral compliance” with eugenicist or otherwise despotic aims. I am not saying today anything other than I say any other day.

See here for more information: https://charitycolleencrouse.wixsite.com/gubernatrixrevisit/april-19-2021.

Thank you. Keep yourself safe.

For the record, today is nine days before the two-year period ends for the “working capital” program that was part of the evaluation provided in the 2024 and 2025 budget processes and was to be evaluated for the 2025 budget based upon the reportage of its resolution in time for Aug. 15, 2025. As I have already stated, based upon actions already undertaken by March 15, 2025, it was not acceptable or even Constitution for me to present my 2026 “Federal budget” and have addressed matters hence. 

10:44 am CST

Aug. 3, 2025

Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse [aka Senator Charity Colleen Crouse (I-TX)]

Three minutes.