​

In June of last year it was announced that the Gasoline Reserves of the United States were going to be released. This was AFTER Congress had already LEGISLATIVELY required drawdowns at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, forfeited on that under the auspices of justifications via COVID-19, and the meeting between Donald Trump and members of the National Petroleum Council in April of 2020 around the time of the “CARES Act” being put into effect.

 

At that time a substantial portion of the “relief” was to be distributed to banks that were supposed to pay out “small business” relief. There were initially two factors of concern in this regard:

 

1. The announcement of Chase Bank that they were NOT going to begin the disbursements on the first day (a Friday) and then a rescission of that to begin disbursements by the following Monday; and

2. Announcements by Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchkin that they were going to hold accountable entities that violated the terms of the CARES ACT including through the “small business assistance.”

 

Official records of this have been altered along the way. What was reported “at the time” was later “ex post facto” reported differently than what occurred at the time. My records were stolen on Sept. 21, 2021. However, the “trends” have been evidenced elsewhere, most notably through the Office of Comptroller of Currency. The “fraud” at the OCC began in July of 2020 with “ex post facto” misreporting through the Semiannual Risk Perspectives in the status of the mortgage market relative to “temporary five-year loans” given to the gas and oil sector. I contend – and continue to contend – the following:

 

1. That the information on the mortgage market was counterfeited/forged in summer of 2020 along with Executive Orders that “backdated” “distress” in manners that did not “exist” in documented form for the relevant sectors prior to the end of June/beginning of July 2020. I further contend herein that this is due to some sort of “secret” swap out in regard to the 10th anniversary of the announcement that AIG had “paid back” its loans from TARP and that this was allowed to be “covered up” based on the refusal to reveal the intentional nonconformity with BASEL requirements regarding “reporting on origin of financing” that were supposed to be put into effect in July of 2019. There was a “barometric reading” on what the financial sector could get away with per an announcement from Warren Buffet and a “72” metric “donated to charity” at the time that the BASEL requirements were supposed to be put into effect. I contend this was done – in agreement – to see if “derivative reporting” would not only be accepted at large but if it would be “effective” in and as an alternative to the explicit requirements of “reporting on origin of financing.” This information was also allowed to be “ex post facto” recharacterized and the evidence I had was stolen on Sept. 21, 2021.

2. That the “gas and oil sector” allowed the “COVID-19” response to provide them with a “refinancing” on those alleged-to-be five-year “temporary loan” arrangements to make some of them more than seven years – and with intention for specific effect. We are dealing with that now.

 

I contended last year that the “price of gas” was way too low and that at the time of the announcement it should be at least more by half of what it was. In the contemplation and calculation at the time, it was put forth that it should be at LEAST by that time twice as much with an expectation that by the end of the summer it should be up to and possibly over $10/ gallon. I did not agree that it “should” be that high by the end of summer but did agree that it was unreasonable to keep gas prices depressed and that an increase was to be expected. I contended people should budget accordingly, and recommended that until further notice everyone create a savings or escrow account and put AT LEAST AS MUCH as they spent at the pump aside in that account and “budget” the rest of their activities accordingly. That would include how they travel, where they travel, when they travel, and other matters regarding gasoline usage relative to need. I contended that within six months to one year we would see the reasonability of that and that this “reserve” would be useful both personally as well as on a collective as needed level. 

 

Gas pricing is not the same as “reductions in production.” Many, if not all, of the Reporters – specifically the Texas Reporters – at Fort America had cases about “price fixing” in the gas and oil sector, that included matters pertaining to things ranging from “insurance” to employment specific to the gas and oil sector, as well as judicial opinions on the rights and limitations of “cartels” such as the gas and oil sector and exclusivization of the “cartelization” of gas and oil and why. Some of those cases involved jurisdictional issues, especially in relationship to Arkansas but also Oklahoma. Last summer  – I believe in the third week of July if not the second – there was an article in the Dallas Morning News regarding a Department of Justice investigation into “price fixing” in the rental housing sector specific to abuse of a software program for the database of available properties with interstate implications. I have been trying to follow-up on this announcement but information is not readily available from “official sources” so I have persisted in my own efforts. 

 

[For instance, at this time the ”11-month lease” that “Elliott” has in regards to my account is being contraindicated by a “15-month lease” that “Sam Mitrani” has in connection with my account. The implications as far as I am concerned are obvious; the appearances of “15-month leases” did not become evident until last year. (I contend “Elliott” is not necessarily in these regards “Elliott Feldman” and that “Sam Mitrani” is distinct from “Sam Ellsberry” although “Ellsberry” might be using one or both of these persons’ accounts for his/their purposes with a “Spanishification” of me into “Cruz.”]

 

By now we would be more than one year since the announcement about the gasoline reserve. In this time, only five times have I seen the price of gas be more than $3.00 per gallon. I contend that it is entirely unreasonable even for the Dallas, TX/Northern Texas area. I contend they have kept the price of gas artificially “depressed” for the following reasons:

 

1. In connection with the “Cash Management” strategy via Treasury which correlated with trends involving “luxury cars” being purchased for what I understood was a short term intended to long-term impact the credit of persons under 21, if not 18, with an intention later on for others to capitalize on this. I call this the “Cougar scam” because of the intergenerational and gender/sex implications. This began and was evident with a certain race-based pattern in late Spring of 2022 and has been evident even up through yesterday with a “spectacular” appearance on “Juneteenth.” Recall the “satphonecalls” from last week…

2. There is completely UNACCEPTABLE “production” of that for which there is a refusal to “take responsibility” as “oil production” – including in the context of long-term “production arrangements” that would possibly require legal response and prosecution and are KNOWN to be completely unsuitable for an expectation of any “foreign trade” or “joint production arrangement.” My concern herein is that there is an intent to “export” it ANYHOW under the auspices of some sort of “black market” or otherwise intentionally illegal arrangement characterized as something else and possibly as a “national security” matter or in connection with a violent outbreak [that] will be exploited as if providing “military assistance.” The major problem is that the “production” of concern is ALREADY known to be criminal in the U.S., including in manners that WOULD QUALIFY AS WAR CRIMES and that the producers and the “price fixers” know this and are attempting to commit to this as leverage in covering up their culpability.

 

The known or unknown relationship with “Net Zero” is one matter but I am specifically concerned with how the results of the gas and oil sector “trials” from 2022 have played out/along with this RIGHT ON TIME and that REFUSAL to officially acknowledge the merits of my cases or the determinations has led to this point. That I “would be” subjected to retaliation for attempting this was already “known” by September of 2019. That they would attempt this retaliation in antisemitic – specifically anti-jewish antisemitic – manners was made evident by September of 2019. That such “would be” attempted against anyone trying to bring a case of such a sort to hold the gas and oil sector accountable has not been AS EVIDENT unless one accepts my positing of the implications of the War in Ukraine relative to the Gazprom case in and through Poland. My understanding is that resistance to do so is “race-coded” in a political economy of “race-equity” brokering that is PART of the price-fixing. 

 

One of the implications of the “price fixing” in regards to gasoline is connected to housing, especially the manner wherein local organized crime elements – including those working with and through both the municipal administration and the “faith-based” services sector – have not only incentivized but in many cases REQUIRED persons to “use drugs” or engage actions that commit to obligations to “acquire with intent to distribute” drugs IN ORDER TO GET INTO HOUSING FOR WHICH THEY ARE ALREADY QUALIFIED. This is not about “prescription medications.” In fact, efforts to secure “life-saving drugs” are CONSTANTLY interfered upon in order to attach obligations for illegal narcotic drugs, including under auspices and during timeframes wherein government activity is infiltrated upon to “give the appearance” of “making legal” narcotics trafficking. This has been recurrently demonstrated in regards to abuse of the alleged “Farm Bill of 2018” and its “legal hemp production” and efforts – including through state legislative/voting processes as well as via intercessions of federal agencies like the Food and Drug Administration. This is more than – but also about – agricultural marketing and also “crop insurance” and abuse of derivatives in connection with alleged “food access” that includes the “minerals” of the actual “earth” in which the food is produced. (“Seed” is a different matter but related – see my reports to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regarding the Norwegian Refugee Council.)

 

This comes up EVERY TIME some OTHER form of commercial or economic activity – and not just for me or relative to or via me – is upon one. There is collusion at the federal level to a degree that local levels can “forecast” when the federal level will provide an “account” for which “options” can be executed locally in what has still until this time been a demonstrable “racketeering scheme” using specific domestic municipalities and the attendant “peripheries” in respect to “foreign leverage” when risk offsets allow for the “hit” to terminate in another country. That my outline for this argument/case has been stolen recurrently since 2016 (what happened to the “reports” I gave to the DOJ and that I gave to Wabash Street in August of 2016?) does not detract. That they may be using my “legal work” as “insurance” only makes the crimes more egregious. If they used my “work” as “insurance” then we get to the other factor evident since December of 2021 via documentation but began in October of 2021 with regard to “AIG” and “reinsurance” of certain sectors. If the original insurance was fraudulent then the reinsurance will also be fraudulent.  

 

That NOW we are actually contending with a REFUSAL to address hate crimes that were also constitutionally eligible for charges of “libel” for SEVERAL YEARS with a recent announcement that specific entities involved in THOSE crimes are “marketing” “gene editing” technology – without being held responsible for how their “gender affirming care” that includes “hormone replacement” or “puberty blockers” is connected to its “organ transplant” operations, ie. “illegal underwriting” and “securities fraud”  – becomes harrowing. This was supposed to ALREADY be covered with the investigation/audit by the Health and Human Services Department last year between July 1, 2024 and Aug. 31, 2024. INSTEAD what we got was what?

 

Among other things, gas depressed to $3.00 or lower per gallon and the continued perpetuation of misrepresentation of persons being made available to others as “vehicles” that can be trafficked using “vehicle insurance” as a “derivative” for how medical insurance is being used as a “derivative” by the entities of concern. I say “derivative” and not “substitute” or “proxy” because the end result is NOT to “return” the person of concern to where they were at the onset of the commencement of the arrangement (regardless of at what level of cognizance or consent they have been engaged) and to instead make the result the “property” of someone else using the “derivation” from the original as the excuse. I contend I have PROVED this with regard to “marijuana consumption” and expectations of consuming “marijuana” with an understanding that previous political efforts are being relegated to “performance” of “narcotic consumption” as a manner in which to “verify” it is “really mine” without regard to the manners in which narcotics usage is being used as extortion and political disenfranchisement in a concerted, strategic and intentional manner. This is not only illegal and unconstitutional, it is also seditious and it is also a just cause for a declaration of prosecution up to war.  

 

Kidnapping people and harvesting their organs for anything – but especially refining process[es] for specialized narcotics production – is a war crime. Targeting people with electronic weapons in order to compel illegal currency trafficking is a war crime. Both legally qualify as torture, as electrocution qualifies as torture. Compelling persons to acts of prostitution – including onanation as prostitution – is a war crime. You KNOW this. Under the Law of War these are offenses that can justify capital punishment. There is no ”civil right” to electrocute people for your narcotics usage or sexual pleasure. 

 

Involving minors escalates this, however, [and] at this time we have a different context to consider this than before. Actually body modification – whether through chemical processes or surgical processes – that render young people incapable of biological reproduction has to be considered in the context of INTENTIONALLY trafficking fertile people UNTIL THEY ARE NO LONGER CAPABLE OF BIOLOGICAL REPRODUCTION EITHER THROUGH INJURY OR NATURAL PROCESSES. This is a crime of genocide. Destroying all the records of a culture, or a political history – including by making counterfeits and/or forgeries of works that actual people produced by materially changing the content to misrepresent their work, including as an act of libel – is a crime of genocide. Creating a marketing tool as “artificial intelligence” for violent expropriation of persons and their work – including accompanied by forced druggin[g] or drugging under false pretenses, including “medical necessity” – is a crime of genocide.  

 

Fascist regimes make up new names for their tricks. It is STILL the same crime it has been for 100 and over hundreds of years. That you do not want it “marketted” as that crime does not change the actual practical activity of committing the crime. There is a VERY IMPORTANT reason why the Constitution gives one the RIGHT to confront their accuser. This is not an “experiment” and this is not a “demonstration.” Demanding behavioral compliance with compelled performance of actions to substantiate one’s “belonging” in a group or political organization they were previously allowed to be a part of WITHOUT EVEN CONFRONTING THEM with what the alleged justification for “deleting” them was is a WAR CRIME. You cannot “replace” the “population” with “genetic performances” that you prefer at the expense of “genetic inheritors” that DO NOT FOLLOW YOUR COMMAND TO ACT THE WAY YOU SAY THEY NEED TO.

 

I contend “race equity” is itself not only a crime of capitalism per se, but via its function and use that the political economy of race equity is a WAR CRIME. It is slavery. The United States was NOT ONLY MADE TO KNOW before the Constitution was authorized that it compels murder but it NOW KNOWS THAT IT COMPELS WAR! There is no “historical reparations” by committing crimes against humanity – including your own and what you would THEN become instead of who you contended you were “supposed” to be. 

 

At this time, the “police power of the state” in confrontation by “use of force by the people” needs to be accounted. As such, today, I am authorizing the following:

 

1. That all corporate accounts connected to any entity that engages in production, sale or marketing of “CBD oil,” CBD products,” or “medicinal marijuana” be seized and liquidated. 

2. That all persons identified as “members of the cabinet” and ANYONE or any entity using an account connected to persons identified as members of the cabinet be drug tested TODAY and if they CANNOT PASS THEIR DRUG TEST BE ARRESTED. YOU “would have” agreed to use chemical weapons that impact your judgment while  performing any or all of the duties required for your position. You have KNOWN since Jan. 24, 2023 that this was unacceptable and you also know that NOW the “men” in the cabinet have ALREADY PROVIDED what would have been needed to attend to this at the highest level of risk and commitment. That YOU would NOW be “using that credit” is a major crime; it not only imperils persons in the United States but it also imperils people in other parts of the world who DO NOT HAVE ACCESS to the sorts of resources we have in the United States. 

 

These factors are as a default on other options. That the judicial branch was to be “held accountable” for the status of the rental market and “pay rents” for all of 2025 in order to address these matters for what is NOW over SIX MONTHS has not been taken up as a cause in or as an alternative to this inevitability, about which everyone was publicly informed since 2023 and including earlier this year. Additionally, it is now over 120 days since an announcement about States through their executive leadership acquiring information on all land and other property holdings that are being used in marijuana or CBD production for a preparation of a transition. THAT also was NOT taken up AS A CAUSE IN OR AS AN ALTERNATIVE. That “CBD oil” sales would be banned is only one step. This was not about CBD oil pricing or access – it was about FOOD and HOUSING access without EXTORTION INTO CONSUMING, ACQUIRING OR DISTRIBUTING DRUGS in order to get one’s housing and food access returned.  

 

I will provide this day an accounting on considerations regarding the application of the “set aside” as a “reserve” on personal decisions to agree to a savings or escrow account with regard to the gasoline reserve drawdown announcements for last year. Whether or not one contributed on or of their own accord or acted in other manners is to be considered distinct from what is now the need to evaluate these matters in this context. I contend that “reserve” should be used in the acquisition of the expropriated land and other property that is now being confiscated from those who have been abusing it for CBD oil and/or marijuana production. 

 

10:13 am CST

June 21, 2025

Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse aka Senator Charity Colleen Crouse (I-TX)

17 minutes

​

10:37 am CST

May 31, 2026

Co-President Charity Colleen "Lovejoy" Crouse