Charity Colleen Crouse v. Harvey Point

​

​

          In August of 2017 a high rain storm came to Northern Houston. The week prior to rain falling reports on the radio spoke of a huge hurricane about to make landfall. On around Wednesday afternoon, the local FM radio station was talking about the amount of rain falling at the moment. But, on the highway in the area I was in, there was not even cloud cover; it was a blue sky. No rain had made it there yet.
By Thursday, I had gone to the other side of the city for a job interview. At least 30 other people showed up that day for the interview. No rain on the way, but there was concern that rain was coming. I left and went back to the house at which I was staying.
 

          Then it started getting dark, as if there were to be a storm. I had had a dream about a week earlier. In the dream, I was in a meadow, and at first the wind started blowing. A storm came, but I was not afraid. There was rain and water but it's Texas and the rain is necessary. This was not the the first time such a thing had happened. In the Fall of 2015 in San Francisco, CA I had also had a dream about a storm. There was this serious pressure around my heart chakra at the time, that moved down my chakra system in piercing pain. I recall laying on the cool tile floor of the place where I lived to try to relieve the pain. The pressure in my heart chakra was like a grinding churn, like some sort of industrial grater shredding something. I could not abate it for nearly two days even though it was nearly a week during which these feelings of pressure persisted. When it did finally abate, I learned that there was landfall for a huge hurricane in Mexico.

          This dream was different but the same. It was not painful for the most part. But there was a dark background that made the beautiful imagery macabre in a way. When the rain started, the woman I was staying with who had a young daughter said that a neighbor had told her they expected it to flood and wanted to know if we should go to one of the shelters they had described on television. This was a serious matter as far as I was concerned. I had seen on the television a news report about how "churches and mosques" in the city had opened up to support those who needed assistance from the storm damage. This was before there was even any real rain. I was also concerned because in all my time in Houston I had only ever even seen one mosque; synagogues were not mentioned even though I knew where at least two were. There had also been a huge political issue in Texas concerning "sanctuary cities" that had divided certain Sheriffs against the Governor and later the Legislature backed up the Governor even though the Governor was completely outside of his jurisdiction to do what he did. When this happened, the discussions about "sanctuary" changed significantly. I told the woman that I did not believe we needed to go to a shelter and we ended up staying in the house.

          When I was in Houston in 2005, there was a hurricane shortly after Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans. At the time, I worked at a law office that operated out of a house. I agreed to stay behind as a staff member and see to the fortification of the house and check on it around the time of the storm to make sure that nothing got damaged. I had my own place and my roommate and I went to make sure we had what we needed. We got a piece of plywood and covered the major window. We had duct tape and food and water. We went to stores and remarked on how there were so many lines of people going to get supplies before the storm. There did end up being a big storm, and we did spend significant time indoors with pouring rain outside around us, but it passed without the sort of disaster that had occurred in New Orleans. In fact, during the onset of the storm, I was outside with others and we watched the rain beginning to come down. Only later after a short lull did we go indoors.

          But this time there was nothing like that. No one in Houston that I saw was out getting supplies like water and canned food. No one duct taped their windows to prevent against shattered glass, much less boarded up their windows. This is important. The radios were talking about the rain fall that was not actually present outside the window but no one was talking about getting supplies and preparing their homes to withstand the storm.

 
          As I recall the rain started to pour down heavily and some of the people in the housing complex where I lived did leave their homes and go to shelters before it got intense. But we stayed in the house. The house was a house that had an old HUD deed on it; I did not know how many other houses there had the same kind of deed. But I do recall that early on Saturday morning I was awoken with an intense pressure in my chest and then a piercing heat. After that, I wrote something. I had a "vision" that I was someone on a military installation on which I had lived when I was a child and there was some sort of "conference" involving members of the military. I believed that at that moment, I was actually communicating with or via a satellite that was involved with broadcasting in connection with that conference. The topic on which I wrote was "military ethics." It was fluent and consistent; I did not need to re-write or over-write it.
 

          Meanwhile, outside the rain was pouring. It did so for about 48 hours. At one point I took a large plastic garbage can and put it right outside the back door to see how long it would take to fill with water, as if I could measure the amount of rainfall that way somehow. More than that, however, were all sorts of vibrational matters ongoing. The bathroom in the upstairs had a narrow window. When I would go into that bathroom during the rain storm, the frequency at which the vibrations were functioning was physically painful. This was a bit different than what I had experienced before, as it was a sort of all-over body pain at a low threshold but still painful. I could actually hear a low dinning of a hum that must have been coming in at a higher frequency. In the other rooms it was not so concentrated, but in the bathroom I could hear the pitch and feel it in my body. I understood that something about the broadband frequency had been changed. It was, as I understood it, as if something was being vibrationally "evacuated" from the houses in the area. Not everyone had left for the shelters but many had.

          Around that time other things were going on that were not about the storm. The woman I lived with was involved in a legal proceeding; I too had a legal proceeding ongoing in the courts of the State of Texas. I had specifically been dealing with what I understood to be fraud concerning the Houston municipal finance scheme specific to upgrades to its flood mitigation plan. The woman I was with was dealing with a divorce and attempted eviction. During the last week of August and first week of September, most of the major public institutions in Texas were shut down presumably because of the storm. There were, however, a  number of legislative changes that were set to take effect on Sept. 1, 2017 that I understood DID occur even though the public buildings were not open. I did not find out about these until after the first week of September. Among them were changes to "business licenses" for certain sectors that between two different pieces of legislation "paired" certain civilian jobs with MOS' of people formerly from the military. Specific changes that occurred included licenses for  "barbers/cosmetologists," "HVAC technicians," and "polygraph operators." There were also updates to licensing for "behavioral analysts" and "pharmacists."
 

          I had been attempting to get a job as an inspector of industrial materials. The job interview I had went to prior to the hurricane was for two companies: one was supposed to be a family-owned supplier of metal pipe products and the other one was a "consulting agency" that hired for various Nondestructive Testing (NDT) positions. The second one was announced later and I did not get to interview for that one. I knew enough to know that NDT has a variety of potential applications, including ones that could be misabused if not undertaken properly, but I also believed that NDT was a means by which I could obtain a job utilizing my prior skill set as an investigative journalist and former compliance clerk in public health to assist with what I already understood was an upcoming needed overhaul of America's infrastructure.

          This, however, is NOT what I understood happened with "NDT" during Hurricane Harvey.
On the Sunday toward the end of the hurricane I was in a laundry mat doing laundry, not at a shelter. There was a newscast on the television discussing two major things: one, concerning the legal rights tenants of apartment complexes had if they needed to leave their homes because of structural damage from the storm that included information about what the landlord was required to pay and for how long and b) that a police officer had been killed in his car under a bridge. Now, in the original television broadcast I had believed I heard the reporter say that the police officer was from Dallas, but the headquarters for the Houston Police Department is on Dallas Street. Later it was stated that he was a member of the Houston Police Department.
 

          These things were concerning to me because of other things that happened during the two days of major hurricane activity. At one point I was on some bandwidth that was communicating with the fire department. I knew it was the fire department. It was a conversation between two members of the fire department and they were shocked at what they were seeing. I did not get details, but the implications were that someone had been telling them to do things they knew were against procedure and they suspected that what they were actually doing was at the least criminal. It had something to do with the fire hydrants. In San Francisco I had worked in Emergency Preparedness (at least that's what I understood it to be at the time) and knew that there were different kinds of fire hydrants with different kinds of water; I was not aware of the Houston situation with its hydrants but felt like something about that was involved. The point was that one of these fire fighters was terrified that what he was doing was seriously wrong. The concern overall was that what was happening was so wrong that no one would believe that they were doing it.
 

          That was the most poignant moment in that regard. But more than the actual storm itself was the aftermath. By Tuesday, I was walking around outside and was in the passenger's seat while someone else was driving around, including on the highways. I was in Northern Houston, which was supposed to be the most intensely hit area. The reports on the television and the news were that Northern Houston had massive flooding. But as I was driving around that is not what I saw. There were a few underpasses where there was debris that had been left up about the street level, implying that the underpass area had temporarily flooded, but that it had receded by the time we got there. This happens in Houston frequently, at least it has since 2005, and I have personally been wondering why until this day Houston has not seen to it that this does not occur. In fact, in 2005, during the summer rains, there was a two-hour period of time when you would not drive on the highways if you knew better because you knew it was going to flood for a while and it would take about two hours to recede (I rode my bike at this time). Whatever I saw was not so different.
 

          In the front of the house where I was staying, there was standing water. In the middle of the courtyard there were puddles that were about ankle high but not too much higher. By Tuesday there had already been a large pool of tadpoles that had hatched in the water. I was astounded at how quickly there were so many and concerned that the water would dry up before any of them were able to grow to maturity. I was additionally concerned because on my first walk outside after the rain stopped I saw two fully grown dead frogs with a huge red spot in the middle of the chest. I understood that something had caused their hearts to explode inside their chests. I was additionally concerned to think that this had happened on the Saturday morning when I felt the pressure inside my own chest and that I had actually "witnessed" them die via my feeling of the physical sensation of what killed them. This had happened to me before in other contexts.

          One thing I noticed was that most of the houses still had their satellite dishes atop their houses, but by Wednesday at least two houses were replacing satellite dishes and roof shingles. This was not something I understood to be an emergency repair. There was nothing close to any sort of structural damage or flooding in that area to justify such a declaration. By the end of the week, the water in the front of the house was receding and before it was completely dried up the landscaper came and mowed the grass around what remained of the puddle.

          Stranger still, however, was what happened at the library. On the Tuesday after the hurricane I went to the public library down the street. The library had a full-circle depression about two yards from the base of the building that I understood was connected to an effort to prevent against flooding. There was no standing water in this depression or in any other manner surrounding the building. At that time, the employee parking was full of cars but the library was ostensibly closed for repairs because of hurricane damage. It did not make any sense to me that if in fact there was some sort of building damage that they would have a parking lot full of their employee vehicles. From a liability and insurance standpoint, if you have potential structural hazards in your building due to storm damage, you only call in the facilities manager and whoever is appropriately categorized to oversee any inspection of third party contracting repair work; to do otherwise is to potentially expose your employees to an unjustifiable risk. But that is not what was going on at the library. A few days later I went to see if the library had opened; it was still ostensibly closed because of storm damage but the employee parking lot was again full and this time by the dumpster what was being thrown out was a stand with a crock pot with fresh food particulate, as if there had been some sort of pot luck during a training of some sort and for whatever reason they threw out the old crock pot. Literally...

          After the library re-opened, they appeared to have changed the carpet at the entry, but nothing else about the library had changed. It did not appear they had even moved the book shelves out of the way to replace the carpet underneath the floor of the main area. If it HAD flooded then that means they were leaving carpet with a potential mold hazard in the reading room. Indeed, while there were numerous appearances of debris from houses that appeared that week and in the following two weeks in various parts of the city, the major undercurrent I registered was a fear of mold developing. If the old wood and drywall was left out on the streets in the Texas sun and humidity for too long, would it develop a mold hazard that would effect local air quality? That was made even more alarming when about three weeks after the hurricane I WAS in a shelter in Houston and heard on the news that the Mayor had revised the disaster clean-up from three contractors to one and that meant it might take up to six months for all of the debris from the hurricane to be removed, but don't worry, because there is going to be a six-month reprieve on property taxes.
 

          The problem is, as a former municipal worker who used to work on annual RFP's for large projects connected to facilities management for the public health department, something as important as post-disaster clean-up would require a competitive bidding process and at least three potential bids to be submitted in order to get the contract. However, any prudent public department that already knew it lived in a flood risk area would have a weighted-system for evaluating the bids and if necessary would be able to contact the other bidders before the onset of the emergency and see if they would be able to provide standby assistance in case it was needed. There was nearly a week when the local radio stations were discussing the oncoming storm and their projections of damage; why was not the municipal or county health department already preparing contingencies for these sorts of scenarios?
 

          When I was later in Houston, there was all sort of talk about how badly the downtown flooded. I did not go into downtown until the Sunday after the end of the storm. I rode a bus and then the train. I saw at that time accumulated debris outside certain yards but little evidence of serious flooding of the sort that was being recounted on the news and radio. The woman I lived with and I remarked on this frequently. As I approached downtown Houston on the train going south the bandwidth I was on changed dramatically. That weekend there were statisticians at work big time. The undercurrent was that there was in progress an effort to accumulate statistical data on storm damage in preparation for "municipally-financed" flood insurance. I had not been made apprised of something like this before. I do know that the week before the hurricane two significant things occurred that I later found no more information on:

            a) President Trump declared a cessation of a moratorium on police access to "military surplus"                       equipment that had been in effect since the riots of Ferguson, MO, and

            b) the announcement that if one more natural disaster declaration was made prior to a certain                        time period and requiring a certain amount that the Federal Flood Plain Insurance Program                        would go bankrupt and have consequences for FEMA solvency overall.
 

          Whatever bandwidth I was on in Houston that day had already been apprised of this and was moving accordingly. It was as if there was a network of different cities that were intending to get their "piece" of different federal programs that were going to be privatized and whatever was involved with the Houston response to Hurricane Harvey was specifically focused on an eventual privatization of the flood insurance program. At the time I was a bit confused because I understood it was official municipal operators intending to avail themselves of the benefits of privatization, but that part made more sense later as I learned more about what else happened during the hurricane.

          And what did happen? When I was on that train and later, I would hear stories about the flooding, but even when I looked for the evidence that people were describing to me I could not find it. I had been homeless for months prior to being able to obtain indoor accommodations for the months of August and September when the major part of the storm occurred so I saw how the "emergency assistance" set up in Houston changed around the hurricane. But the reports of flooding did not make any sense.

          For example, on the major bayou that runs through downtown Houston, there are "banks" on either side. There is a decline from the street level on either side to the water line that may or may not fluctuate. Near the train stop outside the University of Houston is a restaurant that is a bit lower than other buildings in the area; sometimes when it rains heavy the water rises and then sediment will be left in the parking lot. There WAS sediment in the parking lot, but there was no water line in the areas under the bridge or along the walls of the restaurant. In fact, there were no standing water lines for any of the buildings I saw in downtown Houston. There was one bar that was below street level that pulled out its interior items, like stools and carpets, and that did in fact look water damaged, but by and large there was no evidence I saw of debris of the sort that was being reported. As for the bayou, when you looked at the bayou, you could visibly see to where the water level had risen; the currents from the flowing water had caused the vegetation to be severed, but above that, and well below street level, the missing vegetation stopped.

          Then there was the tunnels. Houston has a significant series of subterranean networks that connect many buildings in the downtown area. I do not personally much like going into these tunnels myself. But I did go into the tunnels after the hurricane. And I did not see in any of the tunnels into which I went any water lines on the walls or evidence that the floors had been flooded. What I DID see was even more alarming. In the park to the north of City Hall (which faces east from the west) is an entrance to the underground tunnel network, but this area of the tunnel network is different than others. It leads to what are the garages for the city's municipal vehicle fleet. It is at least two to three stories underground. Three weeks after Harvey, there was alleged to be "pumping" of water from the underground tunnel system in strategic places around downtown Houston. One of those places was adjacent to the garage for the city's vehicle fleet. But when I went down the stairwell, I did not see any standing water. I did see sediment, lots of it, in both the stairwell as well as inside the garage area on the pavement. But I also saw many city vehicles. Why were the city's vehicles in an underground garage that was ostensibly being "pumped" to clear water out? These vehicles looked like they were just sitting there; I did not recall seeing tire marks through the sediment even though I could not confirm that. But the point is, there was no standing water at that time or for the WEEKS I was sleeping outside listening to the sounds of the ultrasonic vibrations that were being pumped underground by whatever those generators were powering. And the city's vehicle fleet was allowed to be kept in an area that was alleged to be "flooded" while they were ostensibly addressing the damage?

          No, that's not what happened. In early November while I was walking outside I saw a bunch of papers that had fallen out somehow*. It was in an area between City Hall and the Annex to City Hall that is to the west and across the street. I picked them up and noticed that they were labelled as being from the Operations Department of the City of Houston. They were for an October meeting reporting numbers from a specific period of time, including September, which would have been the primary timeframe during which the city would have been addressing the attendant matters regarding the clean-up. I used to work in the Operations Department of a public health department in a major metropolitan area; my job was to assist in keeping notes from the meetings and preparing the agendas. It was different than what I saw in this Houston presentation. While there was a list regarding work orders, what was still "open" and what was "pending" belied a sort of strategic alignment that did not make sense from the standpoint of prioritizing operational needs of a municipal agency. There were certainly other priorities that correlated with what I saw reflected at that time in numbers that were reported in connection with the alleged "clean up" of Hurricane Harvey. There were bar graphs in this presentation that discussed, among other things, the various city departments, including personnel additions. Of specific interest was the "police" vehicle fleet, specifically how it was organized and categorized. But there were no reports on any problems with the city's vehicle fleet and the fleet vehicles in the garage across from City Hall were not for the police.
 

          Still more alarming was the numbers. So many, and so precise. I had been tracking what I identified as a "pattern of racketeering activity" that I attempted to report originally to the State Auditor of Texas and then later via legal filings to the Supreme Court of Texas; I had been trying to report it in Houston to various departments, including the police and even the police pension system, but they only engaged me in acts of racketeering connected to the very activities I was reporting. I had noticed that certain numbers appeared in certain sequences that did not correlate with the actual data that they were claiming to represent; based on over a year of actively reporting how fraud was engaged via public services, I already understood there were many methods that could be employed to intentionally skew numbers reportings. I was mostly concerned that there were certain "metrics" that were being coded in specific contexts to have certain implications, which could impact people's access to resources and other matters were those metrics to be assigned to that person in particular contexts.

          This might mean one thing in one context, but if there was an intentional effort to "code" certain metrics for certain purposes using something like a natural disaster then this gives more credence to concerns about social engineering involving access to means for economic sustainability, either as an individual or as a group (is some metric correlation calculating my efforts here not happy with the word "sustainability?" 12:50 pm CST) Sorry ("empowering the homeless to self-sufficiency by not being lied to about 'volunteering' in order to extort you into cooperating with war crimes against your own country" 12:51 pm CST). During Harvey, on some bandwidth, there was a subtext that it was an apocolyptic scenario with multiple references to the Book of Revelations from the New Testament of the Christian Bible. A person of faith may have seen this as an actual sign of the end times for that particular reference point, and indeed, what was going on with me put me into positions at certain times that correlated with the unfolding of a sequence of events and timelines reflected in Revelations. But, as I had already noticed that the churches in Houston were "flipping" Biblical references, including numerical references, during their sermons in conjunction with certain frequency modulations to the bandwidth of the areas in which these sermons occurred and was able to connect these metric "flips" with reportings on other financial matters that were mentioned via derivative as part of these sermons, I was concerned that people of ACTUAL faith were being manipulated using their spirituality for a pre-programmed and completely ECONOMIC motivation. Not only that, especially in the churches that were accessible to the homeless, there was often as part of this "flip" a sort of undercover current of actually participating in some ritual observance that was NOT about the espoused faith of the alleged religious institution. Often times, these "christian" sermons were connected to a current of "muslim" ritual. Indeed, I tracked for years how events at alleged christian observances were connected to events that impacted muslim countries.

 

           Other times, the actual actions engaged by the people under these "christian" denominations were anything but "christian." As a woman who was on the streets I had a particular experience. In Houston, I did not stay in the "family" shelters, at least not very long, that attempted to mostly keep the women and children out of sight. I was mostly with men, overwhelmingly men of African descent, who were supposed to be "christian" and may or may not have been a military veteran (at least as they described themselves). But if I WAS in a shelter with women, then the "christian" service requirements were completely different. The sermons performed in accordance with women's services described servility before god, and making the "master" pleased with what one did, and recurrently characterized women as "sinners" that could be forgiven by god as they accepted their submission to god. Then, often, there would be a current of "pleasure" that would vibrate, as if to say that accepting Jesus as your master at that point would bring you pleasure. Whatever you do as a woman, do not attempt to engage in a manner that attempts to discuss and debate scriptural interpretations; you then become the demon that has to be cast out (literally, getting banned from that social service provider). For the men it would often be different. Men were supposed to serve and there would be a reward. Of course, there was still the acceptance of the "sin" that obviously one had committed in being positioned as they were in the realm of the homeless and destitute, but there was salvation through subordination.
 

          This was happening in the social service centers in Houston prior to Harvey and did not stop afterward. Indeed, the currents became more stark. There was a sort of program that I saw later in other localities as well. But during Harvey, I believe that many people, specifically people of faith for whom Spanish is the first language, were on currents that characterized what happened as being about the Apocalypse of John and that they were to be positioned accordingly.
 

          But then, what was going on elsewhere? In the pension fund meetings, or city council agendas? What WAS reported in the news around Harvey? First, there were the numbers on things like amount of "rain fall" and number of "homes" destroyed and then people who were "homeless." But there were other reports that were going on at the same time. Around the end of September/early October, there were numbers released by federal departments that had correlating metrics, including the US Census Bureau with regards to income by demographic and the Centers for Disease Control regarding certain sexually transmitted diseases. The worst part about the CDC was a concurrent experience prior to the public reporting with understanding that many of the "cybernetic" enhancements that were happening to the women in the shelter networks were being characterized as a particular STD. I understand they were treated with some sort of "painkiller" to alleviate the woman's consciousness about the discomfort she felt during the process of programming her biophysiology for the attendant service requirements. When the CDC numbers were published and compared with other numbers that were being reported, I believed that what I had gleaned from the aforementioned was in fact correct.
 

          And for that reason what happened after Harvey became even more concerning. How many personal, private households were put on the bandwidths similar to the ones that the women in the shelters were on while these processes were being hooked up? I did NOT go to the George R. Brown Center or the Reliant Center in Houston where huge groups of people alleged to be in need of shelter assistance did go for up to two months after the hurricane. Many of the people who went were already homeless, as was reflected at the homeless service providers that were already in place prior to the hurricane. But when those large centers did shut down, there was a significant change that had taken place in the pre-existing shelter network. Previously, in order to get on the "housing list" for public housing, one needed to go through a specific process. Following Harvey, however, many were told to re-sign up for housing but if one tried to do so through the existing housing system then now was required a mental health examination. It was supposedly to assist people who had trauma as a result of the hurricane, but I am already on the public record and had already put a case before the Supreme Court of Texas challenging that mischaracterization. Regardless of mental status, however, it was still impossible and increasingly so in Houston, and as I later discovered in Austin and Dallas, to get food, housing assistance, or any assistance without being put through networks and social service shelters that would require one to allege to espouse a specific faith tradition in order to get access to basic needs like food, shelter, clothing, or bathing facilities.

          Seeking social services from an alleged christian service provider is one thing. But there appear to be NO "secular" providers, at least in Texas. And not only that, but in most places you cannot even eat without first sitting through the sermon and praying. If you come from a faith tradition that does not ascent to accepting the tenets of various representations of a specific form of christianity, then you are told you can go somewhere else. But where? And what if you attempt to engage in "interfaith" dialogue? Then you get the "blood of Jesus" treatment. This is only something that started in the Fall of 2018, but it is more and more recurrent. And unfortunately more literal.
 

          What did happened to "industrial pipe inspection?" After the hurricane I was told by the training center where I received my certification and that was where the interview took place that due to "storm damage" to the facilities that everyone had to resubmit their resume. There were numerous reports about oil and gas "refineries" being damaged by the storm. I do not believe these are accurate. There were other jobs I applied for online around that time and months later the information on my personal data as well as the types of jobs and timeframes during which I applied were changed by someone else. I believe that people who were legitimately interested in industrial inspection or other potentially socially and economically beneficial applications of NDT were "vacated" or "evacuated" of their human capital for redistribution to others who proved their "loyalty" by acceding to "volunteer" assistance positions and keeping quiet about what was really going on. I believe that I and my colleagues were "tortured" in one manner or another and the call out to "resubmit" was an attempt to extort us using our possible occupational options. In other words, you have the skills to know what we just did and how we did it, and yes, we did it to you, but you made it through, so, are you up for the job?

          It is telling that in less than three weeks after Harvey I was in the lobby of the Houston Police Department. I was trying to file a police report on something that was going on at that time. While I was sitting there waiting to speak with the officer, two men came up and sat down next to me, ostensibly waiting to speak with someone about a "job." They were wearing shirts with the name of the consulting company that had done interviews at the training center before Harvey with which I had not been able to interview. I saw a picture of the same person who did the interviews in a public notice about alleged "relief" efforts after Harvey with other people, including elected officials. I also spent a month getting NDTed on the streets while watching "volunteers" show up for sometimes paying and sometimes not paying "opportunities" behind green-tarped chain link fences. But what did they do? Where did they go? Who were they?

          It is important to know that around the beginning of the Affordable Care Act many other factors were at work that influenced the later decision to classify "mental illness" as a disability eligible for coverage by Social Security Disability Insurance. One of those factors I now understand was to be connected to the BRAIN Initiative and its inclusion of DARPA among the sponsoring agencies. Specifically, via DARPA the federal government justified allowing the torture of U.S. citizens and others, including and I believe specifically people with skills who were political opposition, in order to use them for the testing of directed energy weapons in one manner or another. Perhaps you are like me and good enough at the "tests" yourself that the "finance" deals they set up on you provide a means by which to "perform" your way into surviving their direction to you. Many people in important positions did not, people like Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
 

1:40 pm CST
Nov. 11, 2019
Proofread by 2:15 pm CST

 

          By the way...I never agreed to go into the U.S. military. In over 20 years no one affiliated with the U.S. military or their "sons" has done anything more in regards to me than to try to set up hedges for their pension funds or flip annuities on dead people that I might have gotten along with, including cops and other potential military veterans. They appeared to have failed to protect that which was supposed to be most important to them so do not make the mistake of associating the WOMAN who wrote this report with any one who salutes Uncle Sam and leaves their daughters to be loaned out to people who lie to them and gaslight them for...how long...?

3:21 pm CST
Nov. 11, 2019

​

* I have tried to make very few changes in this version from the original draft, but will acknowledge the subconscious implications of this wording. I did believe when I found these papers that they had been intentionally left outside, as if someone had done so because they wanted someone else to find it. That could mean that it was a plant, but it could also mean that they were under some sort of confidentiality agreement and were disconcerted about what had happened so they were getting the word out as they could.

​

​

​

 

 

You do not get a time stamp.

​