​​

At what point did I “formally” intersect with the “social services” system to be registered as “homeless?” In what state or states?

 

As for my current housing eligibility I understand the following:

 

San Francisco:

 

As of the time I contacted the Department of Public Health in 2016 to obtain my medical records I should have been accorded legal assistance with reporting fraud that was on the medical records of concern, including insofar as that information revealed misinformation about both my mental status as well as my financial status. The information regarding my “SSDI payment” is relevant in regards to whatever happened with my accounts at Redwood Credit Union and the context for understanding my credit. As of October of 2015, when TIDA made the public announcement it did at the community meeting, I contend I was legally eligible for a reconsideration of my qualifications for a “lease” that would have “grandfathered” me into the “transition” considerations, going all the way back to February of 2010 and accounting for consideration of my “residency” while I was in the “programs” for several months in 2010. This is especially important in the context of my investigation with intent to publish an article by December of 2014 regarding community organizations on the island and their agreement as part of the transition, as well as why despite living at two separate addresses I was not “permitted” to apply for a lease. I had the “credit” at the time to do so and qualify even without legal assistance in addressing matters that did and have not shown up on my credit that I am supposed to understand are on some “secret” credit report. 

 

As of March of 2017, following the presentation at Baker-Ripley Organization and even in the context of ALL ELSE that occurred between December of 2015 and March of 2017, I contend I was on course to be eligible for a “mortgage” for my own “home” and within six months would have been “closing” on my mortgage. I contend I had a realistic expectation that there was market demand for my skills, including insofar as I had been accepted into a technical training program that I passed and did well in, and that within six months I would have saved up enough to provide the down payment on the closing and would have had verifiable and “permanent” work aside from saving up and applying for my own LLC, as described in my “business plan”/”community organizing strategy” from March of 2017. Had I not been “abducted”/”kidnapped” then I contend that my “credit,” “credibility,” and “resources” would have been substantially different and HAD I ACTUALLY GOTTEN LEGAL ASSISTANCE AFTER REQUESTING IT FIRST FORMALLY IN NOVEMBER OF 2016 then I would have had support in resolving my “credit” complaints to the credit bureaus that resulted in two confirmations that my reports on what I identified as “fraud” in connection with my credit report were adjudged to have merit enough to permanently remove them from my credit report, at least insofar as they contend that the “credit reports” available to me are an accurate reflection of my credit. That legal support could also have resolved:

 

1. What was the status of the alleged “student loan” co-signed by another person (my understanding is that there was willful misrepresentation at the onset of why and whom was involved with the “loan” and that is was actually an effort to “formally buy in” and vest a “stake” in how my work and credit had already been illegally engaged by others in a manner that presented a fraudulent report on my credit TO ME);

2. What happened with what were supposedly “defaults” on my “student loans” that were on my credit report before March of 2010 but then “disappeared” from my credit report by March of 2011 when the “SSDI” back payment was decided;

3. What happened with that “phone call” on the “bus” in December of 2016 regarding the “reduced payment” on an alleged “federal student loan” that was not on my record and never showed up on any credit report when I was able to access my own credit report prior to August of 2019 (I have not been able to access a report from any credit agency since August of 2019);

4. What is the actual status of the alleged “overdue” and “put into collection” medical billing from the therapy I got while I was on private health insurance with the CCSF.

 

Often times when I request a credit report the initial questions asked if I “had a mortgage” at a certain address. I would say no and MOST of the time it would sign me in, but not always. It was always the same city/state on one but sometimes it would ask me about more than one. Why?

 

I contend that no later than the end of 2017 I would have qualified for and have moved into my own home with my own mortgage in the Houston/Harris County area. It would have been at least two rooms with an office space area in either a single-family stand alone or a townhouse type of arrangement. I was NOT interested in a “condo” and actually was looking at a specific building off of the Magnolia line access the street from the TWS since April of 2017 that was vacant for many years (it was an abandoned bank building I slept in for nearly a month in January/March of 2018 that had the old bank on the first floor and a full floor of a three-bedroom apartment with patio) that I intended to use for both my personal housing as well as the location of my “business.” I contend it was well-placed and would fit in with what the neighborhood needed as well as what I wanted to do, including “converting” the drive through area and parking lot into the type of space I needed for the plan.

 

After I went to Austin, I understand that UPON MY ARRIVAL in Dallas I was ALREADY ELIGIBLE FOR HOUSING IN AUSTIN and that in fact my understanding of my “prompt” to go to Dallas as opposed to return to Houston after what happened at the Salvation Army (yes, I DID fear for my life) was accurate. I understand that I was ELIGIBLE FOR HOUSING WHEN I ARRIVED IN DALLAS AND WAS INTENTIONALLY  DEFRAUDED IN ORDER FOR OTHERS TO LEVERAGE THEIR OWN GAIN, including in an anticipation that I would be compelled to “commit crime” to disqualify myself. I understand that another “housing” confirmation based upon the original defrauding came up and was verified as of May of 2019, but that someone held out that it would “take time” to finalize so I was to be “made available” as a “loan” to someone else and that was how the “Ellsberry” matter came up. I was intentionally NOT INFORMED because the “loan” was also to be permitted in order to see  if he could successfully “defraud” me out of ALL that I was owed…and emboldened to do so based upon what happened with the Treasury bonds that matured on May 15, 2019 independent of the muni bonds and attendant matters. At that time what I was adjudged to be eligible for was a “condo” type arrangement in a new construction in the Victory Park area. That was reaffirmed in September or October of 2024 after a revisitation of the implications therein associated with what transpired in September and October of 2021.  

 

The status of other “housing” is an accrual of the defrauding of the original events, and not only in San Francisco, Houston, Austin and Dallas. There are also the matters pertaining to Chicago but also Fort Worth of concern just based on my own physical presence and the defrauding that occurred in those locations. This is also important because:

 

1. Of my work on “real estate” issues for both the Hyde Park Herald and StreetWise DURING THE TIMEFRAMES WHEREIN I WORKED THERE; as well as 

2. My declaration of intent to run for Congress starting in San Francisco in the context of trying to address “proof of residency” issues associated with my living arrangements in the specific district and every act of “fraud” thereafter.

 

Upon return to Chicago I understood by June of 2016 I had met some sort of “seven year” requirement but was unsure what it meant until 2018. I, however, have NOT been again to meet that since November of 2016. That was ALSO intentional. 

 

There has been held out that I was eligible for a “mortgage” in Texas since I lived in Houston in 2005-2006. Party to that would have been meeting the six month residency requirement and what all happened during that time. I understand that part of what facilitated the “Ellsberry” scam was access to information regarding the rental lease I acquired in Houston and who else was on it. The complete implications of this were not made aware to me until Sept. 22, 2023 – which is two year and one day after the “eviction” and my understanding is that there was indeed a two year period of concern AND that the state of Texas “changed” the “law” in order to make the cycles of two years “staggered” with two years and then another additional one year under another context that are to finish taking effect on Dec. 1, 2024 in a manner distinct from other alterations of timelines already in effect since before the 2021 and 2023 special sessions of the regular session of the Texas Legislature. I anticipate I am not the only one having issues of this sort in Texas BUT that “special consideration” has been accorded to me and my…utility…in the processes of evaluating my “performance” while being denied any Constitutional rights.

 

I went on the public record with what I understood could be a good faith context to address this insofar as there is any actual justification for denying one person not otherwise in commission of crime their constitutional rights (for which Constitutionally there is none) under the auspices that other people who have also been subject to crime should get a “leg up” or get special consideration or resource access based upon denial of someone else’s rights. I contend even insofar as one would attempt to justify my treatment based on such an argument, it would be in bad faith through which it was engaged and that has been proven over and over again. This is no and there was no justification. 

 

For which of the “housing” arrangements am I at this time eligible? Under the circumstances, and in consideration of the offense, I contend my “performance” on the street cannot be considered requisite to considerations of “public assistance” but rather the costs of defrauding someone and retaliating against them by “punishing” them with “poverty.” I COULD HAVE HAD my identity documentation returned in September of 2021 and even while I was on the street gotten a job to save money…but there is NO WAY now I am going to accept “back wages” at a “minimum wage” job after THREE YEARS OF BEING VIOLATED to this degree. It was willfully and intentionally set up to specifically defraud me and deny my credit and acknowledgement at the “level” and “rate” of my capabilities – including with the understanding that my early work had already accrued value considerable enough that I was NEVER MEANT TO BE POOR. Any effort to justify my treatment as “social” or other “justice” is MOOT based upon what I DID do and for what it WOULD HAVE BEEN APPLIED if it had not been stolen and misused all of this time. Even if I am “just” a “middle-aged with woman with no college degree and no kids” this was not acceptable.

 

I will not speak again about “obligations” for “enjoyment” based upon  any prior drug or alcohol consumption, and any efforts to coerce me to change my political stance on the “sex trade.” The “sex trade” is illegal and unconstitutional. See above for why. 

 

12:18 pm CST

Nov. 17, 2024

Charity Crouse

 

10 minutes

Co-President Charity Colleen “Lovejoy” Crouse

​

Published at 2:45 pm CST on Nov. 17, 2024.