If I were a financial adviser, or just a concerned member of your community, I would highly advise against taking the $1,000 being "offered" to Americans for alleged response to the "coronavirus." I believe it is a bribe to keep quiet about the development of biological weapons that was a part of the unrolling of the Affordable Care Act.
I was alleged to have received a "bribe" in 2011. I had been told to apply for Social Security Disability Insurance. They did NOT give me Social Security income because I was denied and did not appeal. I was, however, offered $24,000 for "back wages" that were alleged to have been lost for the prior two years that I was supposedly "disabled" and did not report an income. Prior to the timeframe during which that previous two years would have covered, I worked on a third party congressional campaign. I did not get paid and I did not ask to be paid to work on that campaign. I accepted the back pay but then struggled to accommodate myself to "working" and hoped that one day in "therapy" I would get to go over what I understood and SAID the actual factors regarding my "disability were about. Basically, I never believed I was "mentally ill." I believe I had more of a "traumatic brain injury" as a result of being used as a human test subject in processes of technological experimentation, including for weapons companies, without my informed consent. When this acknowledgement or possibility did not happen, I came to believe as I still do that it occurred as an act of political retaliation for information I uncovered during the 2008 campaign.
Around three years ago, I was informed that someone considered it to be a sort of "bribe" to keep quiet about what was REALLY going on with the Affordable Care Act. I was able to trace how around the time I was determined to be eligible for this money there was a children's charity that was alleged to be involved with fraud and there had been a demand for an executive at the charity to pay penalties. I now I understand I was used to launder this penalty. I have CONTINUED to be used in this regard and others since then. I did not know at the time what it meant to accept money from a federal trust like Social Security for what was an inaccurate and mischaracterized disbursement. I have tried to correct the record for going on four years.
In less than a week it will be the ten-year anniversary of the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. I also know that last week there was a ten-year Treasury bond that is correlated with at least two formal notices from the U.S. Census, ie, the Department of Commerce. I am not the only one who received these notices. Indeed, today, which is the one-year anniversary on the closing of the public comment period for the Federal Reserve announcement regarding "derivative contracts" that I have written about elsewhere on this site, Secretary of the Treasury Steve Mnuchin is making an announcement about coronavirus responses, which includes support for a payment of $1,000 to each American. I am concerned that this payment is going to be coded to demographic data that people will provide through the Census. That will mean this $1,000 is a capital outlay payment for the next ten years.
For what? I know what a $24,000 default of the Social Security Trust did to me, my communities, and my life. I ALSO know what it did to the last three federal elections as well as the last three years of federal appropriations processes. I am still tracking what it did, or is capable of doing, for the Federal Reserve. Part of what I learned is that someone or one's purchased my "name" and used it for all sorts of commerce. In fact, there appears to be a "formula" for my name. I was tracking it as a pattern and have been vehemently against the process that it effectuates because of the fraud, deceit and intent to engage in completely illegal and unethical behaviors using that scheme.
Charity = as in love, or a mitzva, but in the world of commerce, it means a non-profit organization available for tax waiver.
Colleen = an Irish name that my mother told me meant "little lass of the meadow."
Crouse = well, that is probably not confidential as much as classified, but only relevant if you got a bid on a contract with my father's name on it and with the USMCA every time this 42-year-old little girl does not do what she's told like a good soldier someone defaults.
Now, if they had not lied and made me a "disabled child command" and had acknowledged that I was a "veteran former child soldier" then we would have had a more appropriate domestic and foreign commercial systemotology with which to address these factors. But they did not. And so, my "budget re-programming" into public health provider from consumer has become a carrier of biological weaponry as opposed to counter-terrorism.
I am not taking a $1,000 kickback for launching a deadly global bioweapon.
See, I already did my ten-years of debt service. I am on the record, and I have PLENTY of hedges at all sorts of levels to work with once the Chinese lift their tariffs in September. It is NOT a public health matter -- it IS a trade war. And we are supposed to fight it.
This is NOT the sort of information I want to be providing today. But years of refusing to address the matters at hand have not provided the people of the United States with a better bargaining position, much less access to a means by which to be availed of our Constitutional rights to due process.
DO not accept their bribe.
DO not accept a bribe in the name of your child.
DO not give them your data for a ten-year bond deal to leverage what's left of your memory of your household or biodata for debt service they should already have collected on from the people who ACTUALLY owed it.
12:25 pm CST
March 18, 2020
Comments