On Aug. 16, 2019 I contacted the Federal Reserve regarding “Rules on Availability of Information” which was posted on Aug. 7, 2019. My public comment was put online. I did not receive a response, BUT I did find a Federal Register notice about that open public comment period that DID directly address my specific public comment. It said, basically, that the Federal Reserve did not have jurisdiction.
Really?
Then what is May Day this year?
I asked an honest question about potentially identifying acts of securities fraud connected to securities issued regarding official personal documents. And on the one-year anniversary of a major bond issue that is entirely connected to…concerns about the theft of my identity and “large-scale securities fraud” concerning “fraudulent” documents, including ones connected to the Federal Reserve system…there is this “request for public comment?”
This is highly disingenuous at best.
Do you know what 7 plus 31 is?
The difference in the metric on the “money order” that was stolen to report my last “official” birth certificate as a “debt” because it was not paid for.
Do you know what my most recent birth certificate is pegged to?
Let me tell you…
It IS treasonable.
I do hope for a recharacterization. I do hope that “due diligence” and persistence in tracking how “identity theft” can be used in acts of money laundering that finance acts of domestic and international terrorism will be soon considered to be an accrued value that provides security necessary to prevent the manipulation of intentionally orchestrated defaults as a means by which to extort or otherwise cover up for serious public corruption. This is potentially available for both the private and the public sector as needed and as engaged legally, legitimately, verifiably, and under terms of informed consent and specific explicit agreement. “Potential” value is part of what assists in determining creditability in order to address needs for long-term investments, including capital outlays on important projects that serve the public good and public safety, as well as determinations about anticipated performance of individuals in order to determine their personal credit potential. Without this “potential” then the whole of a financial system that depends on individual participation in economic moments finds itself divested or the means necessary for its stability. So, as was said somewhere else, “one fraud can become a manifold fraud.” Do I prefer that what I just quoted was meant for a court of law in the course of a criminal proceeding hoping to establish justice for myself and others but is now being provided by me in a “public comment” which is itself a follow-up to benchmarking concerning previous public comments for the Federal Reserve system?
Why do not I and all of those who were so dispossessed of justice not deserve to be given this sort of consideration?
Someone else found it valuable.
I believe this matter corresponds with deadlines regarding “capital market risk.”
10:16 am CST on May 6, 2020
Edit finished by 10:44 am CST
Comments