Maybe if you knew what I was saying before you cut me off for that kickback you would understand why I was such an asshole.
Tue 9/14/2021 5:04 AM
​
(c) A search warrant may not be issued pursuant to
Subdivision (10) of Article 18.02 of this code unless the sworn
affidavit required by Subsection (b) of this article sets forth
sufficient facts to establish probable cause: (1) that a specific
offense has been committed, (2) that the specifically described
property or items that are to be searched for or seized constitute
evidence of that offense or evidence that a particular person
committed that offense, and (3) that the property or items
constituting evidence to be searched for or seized are located at or
on the particular person, place, or thing to be searched. Except as
provided by Subsections (d) and (i) of this article, only a judge of
a municipal court of record or county court who is an attorney
licensed by the State of Texas, statutory county court, district
court, the Court of Criminal Appeals, or the Supreme Court may issue
warrants pursuant to Subdivision (10), Article 18.02 of this code.
Is the employer listed in the NAICS qualification for a sector that is covered to handle chemicals?
There would need to be an inventory that lists chemicals per Sec. 502.005 of the Texas Health and Safety Code (I have one from April 27, 2021 – not for “occupational purposes” but as evidence).
There would need to be a license or at least documentation of incorporation and other records.
I believe there would be considered matters related to quantity. Is there a precedent for a “search warrant” to look specific for something that is not listed? Ie., akin to an “exclusions” list, that if it is NOT listed and accounted for it is identifiable as evidentiary of the charges?
Could one cross-reference counties where there are “leaking containers” for frack water disposal with reports to local police or information provided to other law enforcement of HHS about suspicion of facilities involved with illegal production involving hazardous chemicals?
Then, are the “mineral rights” holders on the lands where the properties located demonstrative of any trend in terms of concentration of alleged facilities for such illegal production?
And then, are the specific sites financed with mortgages or other financial arrangements within or among the same financial institutions?
What sort of reports have been reported by local household chemical disposal facilities versus local waste collection facilities that have picked up chemicals or other hazardous materials that are more appropriately disposed of through another means?
See, if you had a competent overnight then before the courthouse opens today you would have all of this information collected and then you could have the search warrants ready for the judge to sign and you could execute the searches by noon.
Then, what, you’d have the evidence “bagged and tagged” and entered into the evidence inventory by, 3 pm?
That would be a good time to make that call to let the Attorney General know that you responded as necessary.
And then they could let the appropriate person know in the appropriate manner.
5:01 am CST
Sept. 14, 2021
Additionally, can there be a preclusion upon identification of “tenancy” violations insofar as the charges related to the production associated with illegal possession of chemicals? Just in case it is one of those situations where they kidnapped people and are “falsely imprisoning” them onsite to compel them to manufacture illegal substance using illegal chemicals?
5:03 am CST
Sept. 14, 2021
____________________________________________________________________________
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender has no intention of receiving, sending, distributing, or redistributing any pornographic content under any circumstances.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not consent to any electronic record connected to her or her identity being used for any commercial purposes without express prior informed consent. All terms regarding appropriate compensation and intellectual property protections must be assured prior to commencement of any commercial venture.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not in any way agree to any of her content being used for any cryptocommerce.
By receiving this message you understand that there is no legitimate reason for any attempt to be made to interfere with or alter this message in any way, including for alleged "national security" or "law enforcement" purposes. Any tampering with the explicit message or the embedded code connected to this message is a violation of the law and lacks any credibility or creditability.
​
____________________________________
​
​
Tue 9/14/2021 5:05 AM
​
(d) Only the specifically described property or items set
forth in a search warrant issued under Subdivision (10) of Article
18.02 of this code or property, items or contraband enumerated in
Subdivisions (1) through (9) or in Subdivision (12) of Article
18.02 of this code may be seized. A subsequent search warrant may
be issued pursuant to Subdivision (10) of Article 18.02 of this code
to search the same person, place, or thing subjected to a prior
search under Subdivision (10) of Article 18.02 of this code only if
the subsequent search warrant is issued by a judge of a district
court, a court of appeals, the court of criminal appeals, or the
supreme court.
5:05 am CST
Sept. 14, 2021
____________________________________________________________________________
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender has no intention of receiving, sending, distributing, or redistributing any pornographic content under any circumstances.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not consent to any electronic record connected to her or her identity being used for any commercial purposes without express prior informed consent. All terms regarding appropriate compensation and intellectual property protections must be assured prior to commencement of any commercial venture.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not in any way agree to any of her content being used for any cryptocommerce.
By receiving this message you understand that there is no legitimate reason for any attempt to be made to interfere with or alter this message in any way, including for alleged "national security" or "law enforcement" purposes. Any tampering with the explicit message or the embedded code connected to this message is a violation of the law and lacks any credibility or creditability.
​
________________________________
​
​
Tue 9/14/2021 5:13 AM
​
(b) No search warrant shall issue for any purpose in this
state unless sufficient facts are first presented to satisfy the
issuing magistrate that probable cause does in fact exist for its
issuance. A sworn affidavit setting forth substantial facts
establishing probable cause shall be filed in every instance in
which a search warrant is requested. The affidavit is public
information if executed, and the magistrate's clerk shall make a
copy of the affidavit available for public inspection in the
clerk's office during normal business hours.
Ok. So, they refused to accept my affidavit at the Justice Court. The federal district court through the magistrate said there was no jurisdiction for a federal claim.
I contend that is incorrect for a number of reasons.
Can I provide attestation that my “card” and financial records associated with my “card” have been tampered with, including in manners that altered information associated with my case numbers in time for the dates in which the alleged Notice to Vacate and Petition for Eviction were dated?
Can that be used to acquire a search warrant for electronic account activity associated with those involved with the Samuel Ellsberry Trust 2019?
That also includes the “sister” and the “brother” who allege that they have a material interest in the real property?
There is also the matter of my stolen video evidence while I still have the paper that was posted on the “freezer” as well as the notice that I gave to Ellsberry in December of 2019 that demonstrates intent?
Specifically of concern is an indication of purchase of food products and cross-referencing for chemicals additives that would be on the lists associated with component chemicals products associated with the charges alleged in consideration of the search warrant request for the requisite counties?
This should have been done in February of 2020. It should have been done in April of 2021.
This should have been done AS SOON AS I FOUND that evidence on the PubChem site about the correlations with the alleged use of chemical weapons against a foreign Presidential candidate.
5:13 am CST
Sept. 14, 2021
____________________________________________________________________________
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender has no intention of receiving, sending, distributing, or redistributing any pornographic content under any circumstances.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not consent to any electronic record connected to her or her identity being used for any commercial purposes without express prior informed consent. All terms regarding appropriate compensation and intellectual property protections must be assured prior to commencement of any commercial venture.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not in any way agree to any of her content being used for any cryptocommerce.
By receiving this message you understand that there is no legitimate reason for any attempt to be made to interfere with or alter this message in any way, including for alleged "national security" or "law enforcement" purposes. Any tampering with the explicit message or the embedded code connected to this message is a violation of the law and lacks any credibility or creditability.
​
____________________________________
​
​
You forwarded this message on Tue 12/7/2021 10:54 AM
​
Wed 10/20/2021 4:08 PM
​
Cross-reference:
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/21cfr_reports/theft/
Significant Theft or Loss Reporting of Controlled Substances
Theft/Loss Reports for 2014-2018. NOTE: DEA's Pharmacy Burglary and Armed Robbery data that is shown in the maps is a reflection of information reported under the regulatory requirement to report thefts and losses of controlled substances (21 CFR §1301.74 and 1301.76).There is no requirement to report ultimate recovery of these drugs. CAUTION should be exercised in drawing conclusions from ...
These emails reveal a process that COULD have been commenced to avoid the herein mentioned.
4:07 pm CST
Oct. 20, 2021
/s/: Charity Colleen Crouse
____________________________________________________________________________
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender has no intention of receiving, sending, distributing, or redistributing any pornographic content under any circumstances.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not consent to any electronic record connected to her or her identity being used for any commercial purposes without express prior informed consent. All terms regarding appropriate compensation and intellectual property protections must be assured prior to commencement of any commercial venture.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not in any way agree to any of her content being used for any cryptocommerce.
By receiving this message you understand that there is no legitimate reason for any attempt to be made to interfere with or alter this message in anyway, including for alleged "national security" or "law enforcement" purposes. Any tampering with the explicit message or the embedded code connected to this message is a violation of the law and lacks any credibility or creditability.
​
____________________________________
​
​
Tue 12/7/2021 10:54 AM
​
What is this?
(e) If a lawful process, issued by the proper officer of a court-martial, comes to the hands of a sheriff or constable, the sheriff or constable shall perform the usual duties of that officer and perform all acts and duties imposed by this chapter or authorized to be performed by a sheriff or constable. Failure of a sheriff or constable to perform the duties required by this chapter is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 and by confinement of not less than six months nor more than 12 months in jail.
Acts 1987, 70th Leg., ch. 147, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1987.
____________________________
Sec. 432.193. ARREST, BONDS, LAWS APPLICABLE. (a) If charges against a person in the military service of this state are made or referred to a convening authority authorized to convene a court-martial for the trial of the person, and a convening authority, believing that the charges can be sustained and that the person charged will not appear for trial or intends to flee from justice, may issue a warrant of arrest to the sheriff or any constable of the county in which the person charged resides, or in which he is supposed to be, commanding the sheriff or constable to take the body of the charged person and confine him in jail until his case is finally disposed of. The sheriff or constable, on the order of the convening authority, shall bring the charged person before the court-martial for trial, or turn him over to whoever the order may direct. The convening authority issuing the warrant of arrest shall endorse on it the amount of bail to be required. It is a violation of duty on the part of a sheriff or constable to permit a committed person to remain out of jail, except that the sheriff or constable may, if the person desires it, permit the person to give bail in the sum endorsed on the warrant, conditioned for his appearance, from time to time, before the court-martial as he may be ordered for trial and until his case is finally disposed of or until he surrenders to the sheriff or constable as directed by the convening authority of the court-martial before which he may be ordered for trial.
(b) On the failure of any person who has been admitted to bail conditioned for his appearance for trial before a court-martial, or on failure of any person admitted to bail to appear as a witness in any case before a court-martial, as conditioned in the bail bond of the person, the court-martial shall certify the fact of the failure to appear to the convening authority, or to the officer commanding for the time being, as the case may be. The officer shall cause a judge advocate or district or county attorney to file suit in Travis County for the bail.
(c) The rules laid down in the Code of Criminal Procedure relating to the giving of bail, the amount of bail, the number of sureties, the persons who may be sureties, the property exempt from liability, the responsibility of parties to it, and all other rules of a general nature not inconsistent with this chapter are applicable to bail taken as provided by this chapter.
(d) A warrant of arrest issued by a convening authority to order a court-martial, and all subpoenas and other process issued by courts-martial and courts of inquiry, extend to every part of the state.
___________________________
Open air prisons, like being put on the "block chain gang?"
See, the problem was that when someone drew on my grandfather's military annuity from his pre-Korea days, what did they do?
They said they were arrested in the "simulation" while getting a pink slip from that Appalachian shale patch.
Remember?
Asking my grandfather for his wisdom and temperance to help guys getting laid off from a job where they may have previously been involved with activities that qualify, for instance, via an analysis of my response to Iqbal Ahmad's "Whose Terrorism" is different than saying they are under arrest and being paroled.
10:47 am Dec. 7, 2021
When DID a accuse simulation of legal process after the Motion for Rehearing to the Supreme Court of Texas?
It was in February of 2018, around the time I sent the messages to the FBI.
My spreadsheet says January. I recall what date I sent what I did to the church letting them know I was contacting the FBI. There is not record of those reports to the NCIS or the FBI.
What am I supposed to say?
UPDATE: Houston City Council Member Larry Green Is Found Dead – Houston Public Media
Council Member Larry Green. Houston City Council member Larry Green was found dead on Tuesday. The Harris County Institute of Forensic Sciences (HCIFS) is working to determine the cause of death ...
This is dated for my ticket number at McDonald's today, but it is reflecting an inaccurate date, isn't it?
Now...if I send this does it reveal intent to execute knowing that they commit cyberterrorism using email?
I am not tolerating anyone else making an excuse for refusing to contact me because they are willing to concede to terrorism.
Who is responsible for the backend coding that is put on people's email?
They should already have addressed that "pension fraud" and that "MediCare fraud."
This "Green" was a flip for what other Green at the time?
10:54 am CST
Dec. 7, 2021
____________________________________________________________________________
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender has no intention of receiving, sending, distributing, or redistributing any pornographic content under any circumstances.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not consent to any electronic record connected to her or her identity being used for any commercial purposes without express prior informed consent. All terms regarding appropriate compensation and intellectual property protections must be assured prior to commencement of any commercial venture.
By receiving this message you are informed that the sender does not in any way agree to any of her content being used for any cryptocommerce.
By receiving this message you understand that there is no legitimate reason for any attempt to be made to interfere with or alter this message in anyway, including for alleged "national security" or "law enforcement" purposes. Any tampering with the explicit message or the embedded code connected to this message is a violation of the law and lacks any credibility or creditability.
​
_____________________________________
​
​