Last Friday, on June 17, 2022 during the morning, I obtained the annual report for the Texas Workforce Solutions. The date on the annual report was for the period ending Aug. 31, 2021. In this annual report was information concerning:

​

          1) funding provided to the Texas Workforce Solutions center from Walmart; and

          2) a more than $500,000 "training grant" provided by Lockheed Martin allegedly for training in "engineering"                       specialties.

​

I contend that not only are these specific funding items contrary to the stated purposes and authorizations of the Texas Workforce Solutions, but they also call into question the relationship between the Texas Workforce Solutions and the Texas Veterans Commission.

​

The incidences of inappropriate, if not outright illegal, activity that correlate with efforts to obtain resources from the Texas Workforce Solutions centers have been documented for years in at least three different cities in Texas. This also correlates with the alleged "job" database that was provided for some time by the Texas Workforce Solutions centers that have had significant and questionable activities associated with the user accounts since at the least early 2019 that I have been able to document. This includes efforts to compel people to change their password ostensibly because they have entered the wrong password and then require them to answer a 
"security question" that they did not agree to use for the confirmation of their account when they set it up. When such occurs, and one "forgets" the answer to the security question, he or she is prompted or inclined to set up a new account. What happens to the original account?

​

Additionally, a number of alleged questions identifying "skills" associated with specific questions are identified as part of the account process. I tracked through two different stages how the "questions" and the answers, including the selection of specific skills, were used to set up electronic profiles that were used for purposes other than attempting to assist persons who used the database with obtaining a job. During the autumn of 2019, there was a database overhaul. During that time, I understand that the accounts that were already set up through the database were "sold." To whom and for what? Prior to the point at which the database was overhauled, a number of questions in certain areas were regarding a person's experience with handling radiological materials. For what purpose were these questions posited in the manner they were?

​

Walmart has been publicly identified with a database program provided by Goldman Sachs; this is not a service Goldman Sachs provides exclusive to Walmart despite whatever proprietary system that they provide for Walmart. Additionally, Walmart began to design a prescription medication program for its pharmacies beginning in the late Spring of 2016 that was supposed to be in the final stages of implementation by the end of 2019. This would have been prior to the announcements of the onset of COVID-19.

​

Lockheed Martin announced in the beginning of 2019 that it was working on nanotechnology that would engage with naturally occurring biological materials to attempt to alter their composition. This announcement was on the Lockheed Martin site for nearly two years -- at the latest by the beginning of 2021 when it was double-checked after I decommissioned a former blog that had the post linked as a notification. Additionally, as has been alleged formally in a petition that was first presented to the Supreme Court of Texas, appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, and then appealed through the federal court system in 2017, Lockheed Martin's participation in a competitive bidding scheme regarding an alleged Air Force "trainer" program was the subject of concern in regards to how it engaged the bidding process. Evidence regarding the allegations and the means by which the "bidding" was effectuated was available in the Texas Vernon's Legal Codes beginning in 2017 and is still evident in subsequent updates. Is THIS the "information on contract bidding" that the State of Texas wants to be made "confidential?"

​

If one sues the State for allowing such "competitive bidding" on contracting to occur and tries to obtain remedy through the court, can the State say it involves a lawsuit against a "political subdivision" and make it "confidential?"

​

What happens to this "confidential" information?

​

Does it get "re-bid" by the State or apportioned via contracts with the State to others?

​

Like...Walmart and Lockheed Martin?

​

The means by which this specific "bidding process" are coordinated involves a case with the State...against a competitor of Lockheed Martin. 

​

This is not acceptable.

​

These "audits" and "annual reports" are required by law for a reason. If there is intentionally misinformation in the annual report that is one crime. But, even that would be a crime perpetrated in the name of the State, as the Texas Workforce Solutions is authorized via the legislature and functions in the name of the State. This goes for any "annual report" or "audit" produced by a government body or any legislatively-authorized commission. The State is not allowed to fabricate information as part of a "bidding process" and then alter the information later on in order to cover up for its illegal bid-rigging activities.

​

I contend that this demonstrates additional evidence regarding my charges concerning the relationship between the boards of directors of various gas and oil companies that I ordered to be arrested in May of 2022 and why.

​

My understanding is that yesterday, it would have been appropriate time for members of the Board of Directors of Chevron, as well as Shell and Exxon, to have had their initial arraignment upon consideration of whether or not there was available enough evidence to proceed to trial.

​

Would they be provided with a "trial by jury?"

​

Or is there some other "proceeding" for which these charges are appropriate?

​

11:55 am CST

June 21, 2022

/s/: Charity Colleen Crouse

​

See notice as of 9:52 am CST on Aug. 11, 2023.

​

​

​

​

​